Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 3/31/2012 4:04:39 PM EDT
http://www.wxii12.com/r/30809382/detail.html

I missed so much growing up.

ETA: We need a new acronym around here. HTiT = Hawt Teacher in Trouble
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:09:35 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 3/31/2012 4:13:58 PM EDT by Loe_307]
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble


Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:11:29 PM EDT
not guilty
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:12:31 PM EDT
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:19:16 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Loe_307:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble


Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol


Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:21:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 3/31/2012 4:24:09 PM EDT by EvanWilliams]
Hmmm. Not sure on this one. It is established ARFCOM law that attractive female teachers cannot be convicted of sexual crimes against underage male students because of the long standing principle of "If You Would Hit, You Must Acquit" that comes down from Natural Law, the Magna Carta and Hammurabi.

Does said protection that derives from Hawtness apply to drugs?
The ARFCOM Supreme Court of Law (ARF-SCOFLAW) may have to rule.
Aimless, Nolocontendere et. al. will have to render judgement.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:22:00 PM EDT
HahAhahAhHAHah!!

Dumb bitch!

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:22:20 PM EDT
No excuse for that...guilty.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:24:50 PM EDT
based on all the evidence, and lack of bj, def guilty.....
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:27:19 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Loe_307:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

You call that "moderately" attractive?

She's a very attractive woman, especially if you factor in that mugshots automatically deduct 1/10 beauty points.

I give her an 8/10 easily. Maybe higher.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:30:52 PM EDT
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:32:00 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Wobblin-Goblin:
Originally Posted By Loe_307:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

You call that "moderately" attractive?

She's a very attractive woman, especially if you factor in that mugshots automatically deduct 1/10 beauty points.

I give her an 8/10 easily. Maybe higher.


She would be hot as hell if I'm a 9th grader watching her strut around the classroom in heels and a skirt
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:34:25 PM EDT
Gastonia.....
Not surprised.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:38:10 PM EDT
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:52:03 PM EDT
Fucking English teachers.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:57:10 PM EDT
Not guilty.

I want to party with her.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 4:59:46 PM EDT
guilty on a misdemeanor charge


just not quite hawt enough

Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:03:38 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Wobblin-Goblin:
Originally Posted By Loe_307:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

You call that "moderately" attractive?

She's a very attractive woman, especially if you factor in that mugshots automatically deduct 1/10 beauty points.

I give her an 8/10 easily. Maybe higher.


Sorry, I live too close to the Gulf of Mexico so I can't have a windowless basement. I also see smoking hot 20 somethings all day every day. I stand by my solid 6 assessment. If I were a kid in her class than easily an 8 when you factor in hormones.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:03:38 PM EDT
Economics class

Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:10:41 PM EDT
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:23:51 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Dilbert_556:
No excuse for that...guilty.


Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:26:09 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Bob243:

Originally Posted By Dilbert_556:
No excuse for that...guilty.




Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:43:48 PM EDT

Originally Posted By EvanWilliams:
Hmmm. Not sure on this one. It is established ARFCOM law that attractive female teachers cannot be convicted of sexual crimes against underage male students because of the long standing principle of "If You Would Hit, You Must Acquit" that comes down from Natural Law, the Magna Carta and Hammurabi.

Does said protection that derives from Hawtness apply to drugs?
The ARFCOM Supreme Court of Law (ARF-SCOFLAW) may have to rule.
Aimless, Nolocontendere et. al. will have to render judgement.

I'd argue that ARFCOM law applies here due to Locke's Hookers and Blow principle.

Not Guilty.
Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:48:36 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Zam18th:

Originally Posted By EvanWilliams:
Hmmm. Not sure on this one. It is established ARFCOM law that attractive female teachers cannot be convicted of sexual crimes against underage male students because of the long standing principle of "If You Would Hit, You Must Acquit" that comes down from Natural Law, the Magna Carta and Hammurabi.
Does said protection that derives from Hawtness apply to drugs?
The ARFCOM Supreme Court of Law (ARF-SCOFLAW) may have to rule.
Aimless, Nolocontendere et. al. will have to render judgement.

I'd argue that ARFCOM law applies here due to Locke's Hookers and Blow principle.

Not Guilty.


And the Cochran Conclusion:




If you'd hit it, you must acquit it.

Link Posted: 3/31/2012 5:50:49 PM EDT
WTF is wrong with these people? Where is their sense of responsibility regarding proper authority of children? All of these "teachers gone bad" is getting out of control.
Top Top