Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 11/3/2009 5:17:34 PM EST
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed.

Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam."

Somehow I doubt that...

Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy

Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:21:06 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/3/2009 5:23:48 PM EST by Isenhelm]
edit-

i don't know how thats gonna work out....
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:22:23 PM EST
I predict this will do shitty in the states, and gross a billion dollars around the world
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:24:38 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/3/2009 6:26:48 PM EST by Paul]
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:25:29 PM EST
Originally Posted By Bluewaterheaven:
I predict this will do shitty in the states, and gross a billion dollars around the world


Tsk, tsk. It will not gross but about $30 million.

All those hadjis ripping DVD's and selling them for a buck will not make this guy much money.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:28:33 PM EST
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:39:05 PM EST
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:53:20 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/3/2009 5:54:06 PM EST by Lockstep]
How will they promote the movie and the lead "Mohammed" actor, when they aren't supposed to show "His " image? They're fucked!!!! Have to chop off own heads,,...
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:54:49 PM EST
Even if he makes a blatantly Islamic film that portrays Mohammed as the literal prophet and messenger of God and makes every effort to toe the line on the Koran, it will piss off more Muslims than it makes happy. People will die as a result of this film.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:58:34 PM EST
$100 of Black Cats in 7 opening locations will sink this movie. Sell short.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 5:58:49 PM EST
Is it going to have the part where he married the 9y/o girl and has sex with her? Islam and NAMBLA,,,,,,,pretty similar in some respects.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:01:26 PM EST
Will it have the special scene where he rapes 9 year old girls?
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:06:04 PM EST
No true Muslim will be able to see it.

Great business plan.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:09:43 PM EST
Originally Posted By FightingHellfish:
Even if he makes a blatantly Islamic film that portrays Mohammed as the literal prophet and messenger of God and makes every effort to toe the line on the Koran, it will piss off more Muslims than it makes happy. People will die as a result of this film.


That's what I was thinking too. They will be putting a bounty on him. If they make it, I hope it tanks.

Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:16:35 PM EST
Originally Posted By FightingHellfish:
Even if he makes a blatantly Islamic film that portrays Mohammed as the literal prophet and messenger of God and makes every effort to toe the line on the Koran, it will piss off more Muslims than it makes happy. People will die as a result of this film.


+1
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:19:26 PM EST
Originally Posted By Lockstep:
How will they promote the movie and the lead "Mohammed" actor, when they aren't supposed to show "His " image? They're fucked!!!! Have to chop off own heads,,...


That's the best part...they say in the write up that you will never see Mohammed...NEVER SEE MOHAMMED!!
It will be the MOTHER OF ALL SUCK MOVIES....and possibly get everyone working on it a dose of real world reality as they get executed one by one for "offending the prophet" with the low gross.
HAA HAA
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:20:29 PM EST
Originally Posted By 18L30:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed.

Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam."

Somehow I doubt that...

Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy



Will they have the whole movie "accidentally" blocking Muhamed's face like they did with Austin Powers' wiener? That would be pretty funny, actually!

As for hollyweird, I think that they are simply being their anti-American selves. They support whatever enemy we are fighting, whether it is the VietCong, Castro or Islam. If Facism ever rises again (wait, too late!) they'd somehow glorify that too.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:20:31 PM EST
Yeah right, go fuck yourself "Hollywood" !!!
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:25:40 PM EST
I heard Roman Polanski was going to be the director. He's personally handling casting for the role of Aisha.

Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:30:37 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/3/2009 6:35:53 PM EST by Fender57]
In 1976, Hollyweird made a film about Muhammud called "the message".
Basically it was the same thing, no "face" or "voice" of Muhammud.
it was sooo stupid filmed like that. and of course they totally exclude his marriage to Aisha.

And of course when shown in the USA........THERE WAS A SIEGE AND DEATHS.

I can't wait till this hits European theaters.

I have a feeling this film might not get made.
You can actually watch the old movie about Muhammud on youtube nowadays.

The Message 1976
From WIKI:

Response

On March 9, 1977, a group led by Hamaas Abdul Khaalis, seized several buildings and took 134 hostages in Washington, D.C.[2] The takeover led to the fatal shootings of a journalist and a police officer, and the non-fatal shooting of Marion Barry , who would become mayor of Washington, D.C. two years later. One of their demands was to prevent the release of the film. One of the hostage-takers specifically said, according to an on-site reporter, that "he wanted a guarantee from the whole world it will never be shown or they would execute some of the hostages".[3]


OH SNAP! It lead to the shooting of Marion Barry???
Oh please liberal hollywood!!! MAKE MORE FILMS LIKE THIS!!!!
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:33:12 PM EST
Will it have any clitorectomies performed in it?
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 6:34:41 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/3/2009 6:35:26 PM EST by Chris0013]
Won't Islam put a Jihad on them for portraying Mohammed's face???

edit....should have read whole original post...duh.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 8:12:14 PM EST
Originally Posted By bulldog1967:
Will it have the special scene where he rapes 9 year old girls?


Link Posted: 11/3/2009 8:14:04 PM EST
I thought it is against Islamic law to have a "picture" drawn or printed of the face of Mohammed, wouldn't making a movie about him and showing his face (even if an actor) breaks that "law"?
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 8:19:49 PM EST
This movie will not end well.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 8:23:02 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/3/2009 8:41:20 PM EST by bad_frank]
what's that screaming.......? oh. it's just mohammed, burning in hell. fuck that illiterate, thieving, child and goat molesting pirate of the desert. let us circumambulate!
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 8:48:56 PM EST
Originally Posted By Drsalee:
Will it have any clitorectomies performed in it?


It has got nothing to do with dentistry. Wait, what???








Link Posted: 11/3/2009 8:52:24 PM EST
This is hilarious, because to make a film about Mohammad is considered very very very very offensive to Muslims. The irony is delicious.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:06:03 PM EST
Originally Posted By Enigma102083:
This is hilarious, because to make a film about Mohammad is considered very very very very offensive to Muslims. The irony is delicious.


yup, director and all actors are dead men lulz!!
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:09:08 PM EST
In on 1
IBTL

And fuck Hollywood, Mohammad, and especially fuck Obama.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:09:30 PM EST
Unless they portray Muhammed as a raging asshole, a pedophile, rapist, and murderer, it won't be historically accurate.

Even if it portrays him as the most awesome dude to ever walk the earth, it will still piss off muslims because you can't depict Muhammed for some asinine reason.

So either way, muslims are going to go nuts over it (like they do about everything else) and everybody else is going to pan it because it's a piece of shit and a waste of film.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:11:14 PM EST
Originally Posted By Fletchette:
Originally Posted By 18L30:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed.

Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam."

Somehow I doubt that...

Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy



Will they have the whole movie "accidentally" blocking Muhamed's face like they did with Austin Powers' wiener? That would be pretty funny, actually!

As for hollyweird, I think that they are simply being their anti-American selves. They support whatever enemy we are fighting, whether it is the VietCong, Castro or Islam. If Facism ever rises again (wait, too late!) they'd somehow glorify that too.


So either they're going to cover Muhammed's face like Wilson from Home Improvement, or... maybe it'll be shot from a first-person perspective?
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:13:51 PM EST
Oh, IBTL because of everyone not sucking up to muslims in this thread and speaking truthfully about Muhammed.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:15:47 PM EST

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:
Originally Posted By Fletchette:
Originally Posted By 18L30:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed.

Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam."

Somehow I doubt that...

Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy



Will they have the whole movie "accidentally" blocking Muhamed's face like they did with Austin Powers' wiener? That would be pretty funny, actually!

As for hollyweird, I think that they are simply being their anti-American selves. They support whatever enemy we are fighting, whether it is the VietCong, Castro or Islam. If Facism ever rises again (wait, too late!) they'd somehow glorify that too.


So either they're going to cover Muhammed's face like Wilson from Home Improvement, or... maybe it'll be shot from a first-person perspective?


Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:17:17 PM EST
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:19:22 PM EST
150 million for gay porn!? wow
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:20:05 PM EST
A movie about a homosexual pedo murderer. I'm suprised Michael Moore isn't directing this for free.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:20:22 PM EST
Will it have hot pederast scenes?
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:22:34 PM EST

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:
Unless they portray Muhammed as a raging asshole, a pedophile, rapist, and murderer, it won't be historically accurate.

Even if it portrays him as the most awesome dude to ever walk the earth, it will still piss off muslims because you can't depict Muhammed for some asinine reason.

So either way, muslims are going to go nuts over it (like they do about everything else) and everybody else is going to pan it because it's a piece of shit and a waste of film.


/thread
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:26:29 PM EST
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:27:54 PM EST
Wear your infidel shirt to the premier.
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 9:45:22 PM EST
NAMBLA is going to help them with the casting
Link Posted: 11/3/2009 11:03:22 PM EST
Originally Posted By Swindle1984:
So either they're going to cover Muhammed's face like Wilson from Home Improvement, or... maybe it'll be shot from a first-person perspective?


Link Posted: 11/4/2009 12:17:33 AM EST
In before the STAFF serve a Fatwa on this threads ass…
Link Posted: 11/4/2009 12:30:35 AM EST
[Last Edit: 11/4/2009 12:30:53 AM EST by vito113]
Originally Posted By 103:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran.





Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet.
Link Posted: 11/4/2009 1:13:15 AM EST
[Last Edit: 11/4/2009 1:14:36 AM EST by 50cal]
Link Posted: 11/4/2009 1:31:49 AM EST
Originally Posted By vito113:
Originally Posted By 103:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran.





Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet.


During the "cartoon-outrage" there were many examples of images in Iran that supposedly was of muhammed. I think they were said to in reality be images of imam Ali, wich was his cousin and son-in-law. I have no sources though. You'll have to google it yourself

If I remember correctly the sunnis claim Ali was just one of the rightful caliphs (after some assasinations), but the shias claim he was the direct successor or something.
Link Posted: 11/4/2009 1:38:44 AM EST
[Last Edit: 11/4/2009 1:39:58 AM EST by vito113]
Originally Posted By Axethrower:
Originally Posted By vito113:
Originally Posted By 103:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran.





Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet.


During the "cartoon-outrage" there were many examples of images in Iran that supposedly was of muhammed. I think they were said to in reality be images of imam Ali, wich was his cousin and son-in-law. I have no sources though. You'll have to google it yourself

If I remember correctly the sunnis claim Ali was just one of the rightful caliphs (after some assasinations), but the shias claim he was the direct successor or something.



Lots of pictures of Prophet Mohammed in Islamic art


Link Posted: 11/4/2009 1:41:40 AM EST
Originally Posted By 18L30:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed.

Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam."

Somehow I doubt that...

Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy



So, will they show the part about his 9 year old wife? Or how about all of the people he savagely murdered? Mohammed was a pedophile and a mass murderer.
Link Posted: 11/4/2009 1:44:07 AM EST
Could you picture what would hapen if the movie potrayed his life as history and the Gurans and hadiths potray it and not some fluffed up propoganda.
Link Posted: 11/4/2009 1:45:05 AM EST
Originally Posted By vito113:
Originally Posted By Axethrower:
Originally Posted By vito113:
Originally Posted By 103:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran.





Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet.


During the "cartoon-outrage" there were many examples of images in Iran that supposedly was of muhammed. I think they were said to in reality be images of imam Ali, wich was his cousin and son-in-law. I have no sources though. You'll have to google it yourself

If I remember correctly the sunnis claim Ali was just one of the rightful caliphs (after some assasinations), but the shias claim he was the direct successor or something.



Lots of pictures of Prophet Mohammed in Islamic art




Very well then, the "cartoon-outrage" makes even more sense now!
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Top Top