Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 5/10/2004 12:19:42 PM EST
Can anyone think of anything scarier than Hitlery in the white house? I've been listening to Hannity talking to Dick Morris about her (it).
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:20:18 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:20:55 PM EST
[Last Edit: 5/10/2004 12:21:30 PM EST by DriftPunch]
Sean Hannity in the White House is just as scary!
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:21:19 PM EST
Bill as the First Lady!
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:29:03 PM EST

Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
Sean Hannity in the White House is just as scary!



You on crack?


She's a 1000 times worse.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:37:55 PM EST

Originally Posted By sherm8404:

Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
Sean Hannity in the White House is just as scary!



You on crack?


She's a 1000 times worse.



Of course she is...

I just don't like Hannity. His type bother me, as he lacks a libertarian streak. He shares the love of government with the liberals, only he would use such power to further the agenda of the right as opposed to the left.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:54:00 PM EST
Nothing is scarier. Read up a bit on her history. She is a TRUE believer in socialism. Bill just liked living large and getting blow jobs in the Oval Office. Hitlery is fucking DANGEROUS!

Stand by Boyz...she's on her way like a long...slow frieght train. IF the American people really had a clue about her...she couldn't make fucking dogcatcher...except in Massachusettes, New York, Detroit, Newark, Oakland or some other screwy leftis enclave like Kalifornistan. (I know...I"m mixing venues!)

GOD Help us when she runs!

Link Posted: 5/10/2004 12:55:24 PM EST
Hitlery in the White House?

"we're recommending that all of our clients go long in ammunition and canned goods" - the movie "Gremlins"
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:13:07 PM EST
ARFCOM replacing all the mods with ones from the DU.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:14:01 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:18:06 PM EST

Originally Posted By NevadaARshooter:
Can anyone think of anything scarier than Hitlery in the white house? I've been listening to Hannity talking to Dick Morris about her (it).



You really need to put anything Sean Hannity says under the microscope. That guy if more full of it than the politicians are.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:20:22 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:22:03 PM EST
She'll euthanize all of us.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:25:56 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:37:21 PM EST
[Last Edit: 5/10/2004 1:38:37 PM EST by KUpolo]

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:

Originally Posted By KUpolo:

Originally Posted By NevadaARshooter:
Can anyone think of anything scarier than Hitlery in the white house? I've been listening to Hannity talking to Dick Morris about her (it).



You really need to put anything Sean Hannity says under the microscope. That guy if more full of it than the politicians are.



Example?



My god man! If you don't already know......

On page 94 of "Let Freedom Ring", Hannity writes:

"[Congressman] Kucinich...accused the president of the United States of authorizing 'the bombing of civilians in Afghanistan.'....In no way is that the Bush administration's policy or practice in the Afghan theater or anywhere in the world. The whole thing was complete fabrication -- and downright infuriating. So we had Kucinich on Hannity & Colmes, and I confronted him....'Wait a minute,' the congressman insisted. 'The truth is that civilians have been bombed. That's a fact. You can't dispute that.' There is, of course, no evidence to support this charge."

No evidence to support this charge? Now that is what I call a "complete fabrication." Even if one believes the killing of Afghan civilians was justified, that does not justify lying about it after the fact. Contrary to Hannity's empty assertion, there is overwhelming evidence that these killings did, indeed, take place. For details, read British researcher Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed's book, The War on Freedom, and/or American professor Marc W. Herold's essay, Dead Afghan Civilians: Disrobing the Non-Counters.

On page 110, Hannity writes:

"Unfortunately, during the Clinton-Gore administration, weapons inspectors were kicked out of Iraq."

Wrong again. The inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq by the United Nations in anticipation of a U.S. attack. This was widely reported in the mainstream media in 1998. In 2002, however, right-wing "journalists" like Hannity began saying over and over again that the inspectors were "kicked out" of Iraq, apparently believing that a lie becomes the truth when repeated often enough. To see a very disturbing contrast between what was reported in 1998 and what is being reported now, read the online article, What a Difference Four Years Makes, by FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting).

And finally, on page 33, Hannity writes:

"Gary Webb...wrote an explosive series of articles titled 'Dark Alliance,' in which he tried to link the CIA to the introduction of crack cocaine in America....There was just one problem: the story was false."

And what does Hannity offer to substantiate his arrogant dismissal of Webb's exhaustive research? Nothing more than the mere fact that the CIA denied Webb's allegations, and the fact that these denials were dutifully parroted in the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times and the Washington Post. The truth is, Webb's allegations are thoroughly documented and have never been credibly refuted. It is Hannity's irresponsible assertion to the contrary that is "false." For details, see FAIR's 1997 article, Snow Job: The Establishment's Papers Do Damage Control for the CIA, Gary Webb's 1998 book, Dark Alliance, and the CIA & Drugs section of Mike Ruppert's web site.



If this isn't enough, type "Sean Hannity lies" into google and read some of the 24,000 web pages that are displayed.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:39:25 PM EST

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:

Originally Posted By KUpolo:

Originally Posted By NevadaARshooter:
Can anyone think of anything scarier than Hitlery in the white house? I've been listening to Hannity talking to Dick Morris about her (it).



You really need to put anything Sean Hannity says under the microscope. That guy if more full of it than the politicians are.



Example?



He worships John McCain.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:46:24 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:46:37 PM EST

Originally Posted By Aimless:
At least it'd get her out of NY



Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:48:30 PM EST
I personally can't think of a scarier person in the White House. Hillery was pretty much the brains behind Bill C's White House stay. Even though "she" says she's not running for prez, you had better bet your bottom dollar that she will be trying to be the first woman prez of the USA at some point in the future.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:49:54 PM EST

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:
Um, I haven't read his book--I regularly listen to his radio show and have heard none of those mentioned. As to his attitude toward McCain, he's entitled to his (boneheaded, IMO) opinion. I wouldn't say he "worships" him, but he doesn't view him in the same contemptful light I do.



His fabrications go waaaay beyond just the three I mentioned. Everytime I watch that show and I hear something that doesn't sound right, I check it out. 90% of the time Sean just bent the truth or outright made something up. He does it nearly every day!
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 1:50:58 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 2:05:33 PM EST
As I mentioned I listen to Hannity... haven't ever heard him lie about anything.

Anyway, even if he did (which he doesn't), the dangerous people are the ones with political power not guys on the radio/tv. Hitlery in the white house >= VP would not be pleasent for gunners and tax payers.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 2:14:33 PM EST

Originally Posted By KUpolo:

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:

Originally Posted By KUpolo:

Originally Posted By NevadaARshooter:
Can anyone think of anything scarier than Hitlery in the white house? I've been listening to Hannity talking to Dick Morris about her (it).



You really need to put anything Sean Hannity says under the microscope. That guy if more full of it than the politicians are.



Example?



My god man! If you don't already know......

On page 94 of "Let Freedom Ring", Hannity writes:

"[Congressman] Kucinich...accused the president of the United States of authorizing 'the bombing of civilians in Afghanistan.'....In no way is that the Bush administration's policy or practice in the Afghan theater or anywhere in the world. The whole thing was complete fabrication -- and downright infuriating. So we had Kucinich on Hannity & Colmes, and I confronted him....'Wait a minute,' the congressman insisted. 'The truth is that civilians have been bombed. That's a fact. You can't dispute that.' There is, of course, no evidence to support this charge."

No evidence to support this charge? Now that is what I call a "complete fabrication." Even if one believes the killing of Afghan civilians was justified, that does not justify lying about it after the fact. Contrary to Hannity's empty assertion, there is overwhelming evidence that these killings did, indeed, take place. For details, read British researcher Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed's book, The War on Freedom, and/or American professor Marc W. Herold's essay, Dead Afghan Civilians: Disrobing the Non-Counters.

On page 110, Hannity writes:

"Unfortunately, during the Clinton-Gore administration, weapons inspectors were kicked out of Iraq."

Wrong again. The inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq by the United Nations in anticipation of a U.S. attack. This was widely reported in the mainstream media in 1998. In 2002, however, right-wing "journalists" like Hannity began saying over and over again that the inspectors were "kicked out" of Iraq, apparently believing that a lie becomes the truth when repeated often enough. To see a very disturbing contrast between what was reported in 1998 and what is being reported now, read the online article, What a Difference Four Years Makes, by FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting).

And finally, on page 33, Hannity writes:

"Gary Webb...wrote an explosive series of articles titled 'Dark Alliance,' in which he tried to link the CIA to the introduction of crack cocaine in America....There was just one problem: the story was false."

And what does Hannity offer to substantiate his arrogant dismissal of Webb's exhaustive research? Nothing more than the mere fact that the CIA denied Webb's allegations, and the fact that these denials were dutifully parroted in the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times and the Washington Post. The truth is, Webb's allegations are thoroughly documented and have never been credibly refuted. It is Hannity's irresponsible assertion to the contrary that is "false." For details, see FAIR's 1997 article, Snow Job: The Establishment's Papers Do Damage Control for the CIA, Gary Webb's 1998 book, Dark Alliance, and the CIA & Drugs section of Mike Ruppert's web site.



If this isn't enough, type "Sean Hannity lies" into google and read some of the 24,000 web pages that are displayed.



Congratulations...another DUer surfaces.

You're just still pissed over losing the 2000 election...no worries. kerry is going to get blown out like Dukakis did..can't wait to read your b.s. then.

Your party is full of liars..it is a modern day den of thieves and liars. How amusing it is for you to even attempt to crtique a conservative. Funny as hell, it is.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 2:17:37 PM EST
[Last Edit: 5/10/2004 2:19:57 PM EST by captainpooby]

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:

Originally Posted By KUpolo:

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:
Um, I haven't read his book--I regularly listen to his radio show and have heard none of those mentioned. As to his attitude toward McCain, he's entitled to his (boneheaded, IMO) opinion. I wouldn't say he "worships" him, but he doesn't view him in the same contemptful light I do.



His fabrications go waaaay beyond just the three I mentioned. Everytime I watch that show and I hear something that doesn't sound right, I check it out. 90% of the time Sean just bent the truth or outright made something up. He does it nearly every day!



What is your opinion of Hillary Clinton--you know, the topic of this thread?



Hillary Clinton? She gives me the creeps. I think she is a power hungry communist bent on total control and destruction of this country as we know it.
You asked for an example of Hannity's full of itness and I gave one. McCain loves Hillary.

ETA: I like Sean Hannity for the most part but he does seem a bit toady.
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 4:25:16 PM EST
I'll bet you ten bucks that Hannity is fine with the AWB
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 4:40:25 PM EST
Hmmmm, how about James Carville and Bill Maher as a ticket???
Link Posted: 5/10/2004 4:43:12 PM EST

Originally Posted By NevadaARshooter:
Can anyone think of anything scarier than Hitlery in the white house? I've been listening to Hannity talking to Dick Morris about her (it).



A Playboy centerfold of her spread eagle in the Oval Office??


Sure to be followed by a dramatic increase in young men entering the priesthood, and swearing a vow of chastity.



Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:59:54 AM EST

Originally Posted By Aimless:
At least it'd get her out of NY



She was voted into NY... not like she just bought a house there and rallied all the liberal voters while gagging all the conservatives...

I don't really worry about it too much. This country couldn't handle a women in charge just yet. It might be in my lifetime with all the liberals teaching in schools these days... but there are still enough level headed old timers and military people who would never let it happen.

In the event that it did happen, as there is certainly a surge in all these women's groups, she'd probably get plugged before the year is up... just hope her VPOTUS isn't a woman too... She would have to get a real seemingly neutral kind of running mate to balance out her hard left reputation.

I think zombies will take over long before she does...
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 7:12:15 AM EST
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 7:51:03 AM EST

Originally Posted By Aimless:
At least it'd get her out of NY



Like getting Willie out of Arkansas?

My Mom lives in upstate NY. She said she felt physically ill when the election results were announced and the Hildebeast was her new senator.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 8:15:14 AM EST

Originally Posted By pathfinder74:
She was voted into NY... not like she just bought a house there and rallied all the liberal voters while gagging all the conservatives...

I don't really worry about it too much. This country couldn't handle a women in charge just yet. It might be in my lifetime with all the liberals teaching in schools these days... but there are still enough level headed old timers and military people who would never let it happen.

In the event that it did happen, as there is certainly a surge in all these women's groups, she'd probably get plugged before the year is up... just hope her VPOTUS isn't a woman too... She would have to get a real seemingly neutral kind of running mate to balance out her hard left reputation.

I think zombies will take over long before she does...



She was elected by the liberal city and suburban voters in NY. She does not represent the conservative less populated areas of the state.

Hillary is very popular across the U.S with this segment of the population. Remember if she is elected it will be by the electoral vote of the states and not the popular vote. Do not under estimate her potential to be elected the POTHUS in 2008.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 8:24:17 AM EST

Originally Posted By rkbar15:
Do not under estimate her potential to be elected the POTHUS in 2008.



and don't underestimate the potential of the alpha male dominated society...
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 8:30:09 AM EST
I can't wait...I hope they take lurch out of the running and put hitlery in.......go zombies....
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 8:30:46 AM EST
Her nickname in college was "The campus communist".
If you look closely in the watergate trial photos, you'll see her in the "Gang of Four" closely huddled behind the top demo henchmen.

I would bet that her entire adult life has been aimed at one objective: becoming president.

There is no more dangerous person than Hitlery Klinton for that job. She barely masks her insanity now and given the power of the oval office, would most likely become the worst tyrant in this country's history.

I've watched her begin to lose control during a fund raising speech with her screams growing strained and her voice cracking. I've read, like many of you, about her going completely ballistic on bill in front of the staff, and in the next second coming through a doorway with a smile and soft tone to greet the public.

This woman, if she can be classified as such, is the biggest threat to this country in its history.

Pre-ban? Hah! More like class A felony for possession of any firearm if she gets her way.
National health care would soon follow with us paying the bills. The media, already in love with the left, would certainly stifle any critcism of her administration. It would be decades before a representative government could have a chance to get in power, if ever.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 8:36:26 AM EST
[Last Edit: 5/11/2004 8:37:35 AM EST by Red_Label]
It's good to see that this thread finally made its way back TO THE TOPIC OF HILLARY. You DU'ers comparing her to Hannity are just pathetic. At least try to be less transparent...

P.S. There is NO ONE NOW ON AMERICAN SOIL who scares me more than Hillary. She's evil and power-insane...
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 8:37:11 AM EST

Originally Posted By sherm8404:

Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
Sean Hannity in the White House is just as scary!



You on crack?


She's a 1000 times worse.



How about the reality that JFK might get in office.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:01:00 PM EST

Originally Posted By Chaingun:
She's a 1000 times worse.



How about the reality that JFK might get in office.

I'm not too terribly worried about that.... because Hitlery won't Mr. Heinz to take up her position as Dem candidate. She'll do what she can to sabotage him so that she is free and clear to run in '08.

Personally I think that the Republicans can put a steaming pile of shit into office in 08 if she is the Dem candidate... 4 years is a long time for her to keep her crazy mouth shut and for the conservatives to bring as much of her skeletons to light in order to circumvent any possibility of her attempting to become the president [again]. The only upside to the idea of her being president is we wouldn't have to worry about wasted tax dollars because she hadto have her dick sucked by an intern.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:16:36 PM EST

Originally Posted By pathfinder74:

Originally Posted By Chaingun:
She's a 1000 times worse.



How about the reality that JFK might get in office.

I'm not too terribly worried about that.... because Hitlery won't Mr. Heinz to take up her position as Dem candidate. She'll do what she can to sabotage him so that she is free and clear to run in '08.

Personally I think that the Republicans can put a steaming pile of shit into office in 08 if she is the Dem candidate... 4 years is a long time for her to keep her crazy mouth shut and for the conservatives to bring as much of her skeletons to light in order to circumvent any possibility of her attempting to become the president [again]. The only upside to the idea of her being president is we wouldn't have to worry about wasted tax dollars because she hadto have her dick sucked by an intern.



Mark my words, if Hillary runs in 08, we will see Rice as her opponent...

If we must elect a female president in 2008, Rice would be the one to put in...
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:37:01 PM EST
She might be the logical choice in terms of leadership, but if the country is going to have a hard enough time accepting the idea of the first US president, do you think the republicans are going to tack on the first black president onto that as well. Not sure the are willing to risk that at the risk of HItlery getting into office [again].

But, in such a whacky election race, who's to say that Republicans won't try to put do a woman on woman race... heheh... woman on woman... The only risk with that is that Hitlery has the popularity/recognizability... the only people who know who Rice is are the people like us who actually pay attention to the shit going on in the news. Most of the average people in this country don't have the first clue who she is or what she does. But you say Klinton and everyone's ear perk up, whether to praise or bash, they know the name and that seems to be a big thing in her favor. Because sheeple who vote do it like they take a multiple choice test... whatever name jumps out at them they vote for.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:41:17 PM EST

Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Mark my words, if Hillary runs in 08, we will see Rice as her opponent...

If we must elect a female president in 2008, Rice would be the one to put in...



I've alluded to that before, postulating that if Cheney should bow out for health reasons, Rice would be an excellent replacement...
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:50:34 PM EST
Once again, while it would be nice to see her as VP, I doubt Bush is ready to take that risk based on his popularity with the war in Iraq and the teetering popularity of JFK. It's going to be hard enough for people to try to decide who to let play in Iraqw for the next four years with out also battling with the idea of a black female VP... and I doubt Bush would want to put a big crosshair on his head either... remember what Chris Rock said, "If there was a black vice president I'd kill the president." I'm sure there are a lot of people who honestly believe in that as it might be the only 100% guaranteed way to get a black person as POTUS. I'm not wearing a white hood or anything like that... it's simple reality. Personally I think Rice is awesome, but she'd stand a lot better chance if things weren't so politically turbulent right now. If things were as calm as they were in the 00 election it might be different, but right now there is too much negative press against Bush for him to pull off a stunt like that. IMO
Top Top