Quoted:
Thanks for the replies. But still a toss up.
Both are '00s.
Consumer reports rated the Tundra as a best buy. JD Power rated it best 3 years in a row.
I like the F150's have 1 already as the "Company Work Truck". It's been good so far.
GM And Jeeps rated very poor quality and reliabillity.
Had 1 before the F150(C1500) and Jeep Cherokee prior to that.
Both died before their time.
FWIW, C.R. rated Toyota and Ford above the others.
Thanks for the input,
Del
View Quote
Do your self a favor and toss out your copy of Consumer reports.
Og to an auto shop and ask one of the techs what they fix the most and what is the cost.
I can give you 50 car mags and not two will have the same "best buy"
There are alot of opinions here and some are good (some not) and if we were talking about guns I would defer to thses guys but I doubt there is anybody here who has built as many cars as I have.
Let mne put it this way,I pulled a 1991 S-10 pick-up out of a junk yard and installed $100.00 worth of new sensors and filters.
Now the truck runs like new and the guy that has it is blown away.
Nobody ever told him that just because his old 1983 Toyota pick-up may run it's out of tolerance and makes next to no horse power.
That S-10 would run for about five mins and stut off and nobody could fix it,the old owner put $1,500 in it and then junked it.
Go to a Chevy dealer and test drive a new truck,pop the hood and pull the water temp sensor off.
It will run like crap,the engine does need it to run but the computer will did that to prevent damage,the only thing that you would need to fix is a $20.00 sensor.
Just one example of were the quality misconception comes from.