Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 12/9/2001 4:52:44 PM EDT
The senators asked the attorney Gen. why he does not use the NIKS background check to find out if the suspects have bought guns.I don't know a lot but these records are not suppose to be destroyed after the transaction with in 1 to 3 days according to the law?.how he can use something that suposedly does not exist?.If he does, a good lawyer and a decend Judge would let a criminal go,because of illegally optened evidense?
which part i am wrong?
Link Posted: 12/9/2001 11:28:34 PM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 12/10/2001 3:00:08 PM EDT
[#2]
Thanks for the answer.So since the records are not destroyed yet, can they legally be used?or they have to find another way to find out about the gun purchases?
Link Posted: 12/10/2001 3:11:31 PM EDT
[#3]
Let's see... How many people were prosocuted for failing an "Instand Check"  less than 10 if I recall correctly. And that's when Reno was AG. A real success story there.

[smoke]
Link Posted: 12/10/2001 3:34:55 PM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 12/10/2001 5:52:23 PM EDT
[#5]
,>>> he assured everyone that they would never be used that way.<<<<
He forgot to mencion that when he ambused A.G. Ascroft!!!
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top