Finally, someone who took the time to read the judgement as I did. Skunkability you have it just about right. You, however, need to consider the CA '99 AW ban, and the Fed '94 AW ban. Both of these ban features. The CA '99 AW ban is more restrictive than the Feds. The Feds require three features to be a banned AW while CA only requires two. Read all about it at [url]caag.state.ca.us/firearms[/url]
Troy, I see you are finally coming around. As I said several times in the past two months that "Harrott vs. County of Kings" blew a big hole in the Roberti-Roos AW ban. The series ban that was added in later because of Lundgren not adding to the list is what was struck down by CASC.
So as I said earlier, the Fulton-Armory lower and others not specifically listed are legal in CA as long as you adhere to the features ban.
The beauty here is that if enough of us purchase these, then Lockyer will be forced to place that mfg/model on the list. Once he does this, then we would have 90 days to register the lower. Once we register the lower, we can put whatever features we want but only restricted by the Fed '94 AW ban which may sunset in 2004. Walla, you have your fully loaded AR rifle.
The only problem, as someone pointed out, is finding a CA FFL with balls. I should point out that I was not the creative thinker on this strategy. I first heard it from the guys at Cold War Relics in Monterry. They making some business plans around this until Kasler vs. Lockyer was lost. So, in effect, CASC switched their ruling in Harrott.