User Panel
Posted: 8/29/2015 11:04:04 PM EDT
|
|
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaFby4MX76o&feature=youtu.be[/youtube]
|
|
That would actually be useful if you were in the back country or doing something where you were moving around enough.
If that were the case, I'd be using a holster so................... |
|
Not a bad idea until you are pointing the gun at your hand behind your back and trying to manipulate a piece of tubing into the barrel...
But for his efforts I'll give him a hand...that's right, only ONE hand because I might destroy my other one using his product. |
|
Well, it is pretty imaginative if nothing else.
How drunk was this guy when he thought of that? |
|
Have I told you guys about my free-hanging Glock necklace? I'm calling it "Glog Tags"
|
|
Lots of opportunities for a new hole there given the lack of trigger guard coverage.
|
|
|
|
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw -
|
|
Quoted:
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw - View Quote Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. |
|
Well at least he used a finely tuned state of the art masterpiece S&W Sigma.
|
|
Quoted:
Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw - Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. |
|
Anyone else thinks this guy looks like a disingenuous Larry Potterfield?
|
|
If only Plaxico had seen this video twenty years ago...
He would have had a bunch of shrapnel in his back, instead of having an easily treatable GSW to his leg. |
|
Wow. At first I was laughing until I realized it wasn't a joke. Then I was like
|
|
I'm not really sure what question or problem this is answering...?
|
|
Quoted:
Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw - Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. Isn't pointing a pistol slightly against your back to get it to go under your waistband regardless of the presence of this device just as likely to serve as a one way trip to being paralyzed? As I said, its stupid due to safety issues, but provides better retention than nothing. It sounds like we're both sold on actual, fitting, holsters regardless. We'll both be keeping al of our fingers and our ability to walk. . - Nw - |
|
Quoted:
Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw - Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. Even better with a metal tube stuck in the barrel an ND will probably result in an over-pressure situation that'll blow the barrel or slide open or case failure that'll blow into the magwell causing aditional rounds to detonate. THAT oughta make for a fun day in the ER! |
|
|
Holy shit.
Way worse than I could have ever believed That's literally going to get someone killed |
|
|
Quoted:
Isn't pointing a pistol slightly against your back to get it to go under your waistband regardless of the presence of this device just as likely to serve as a one way trip to being paralyzed? As I said, its stupid due to safety issues, but provides better retention than nothing. It sounds like we're both sold on actual, fitting, holsters regardless. We'll both be keeping al of our fingers and our ability to walk. . - Nw - View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw - Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. Isn't pointing a pistol slightly against your back to get it to go under your waistband regardless of the presence of this device just as likely to serve as a one way trip to being paralyzed? As I said, its stupid due to safety issues, but provides better retention than nothing. It sounds like we're both sold on actual, fitting, holsters regardless. We'll both be keeping al of our fingers and our ability to walk. . - Nw - Actually in the position he is carrying it he will probably just blow off his asshole. Unless he has managed to create a bore obstruction already and his whole firearm kablooeys in his pants like the other poster said. Either way, I would love to tell that guy to his face he is a douche canoe. |
|
I'm seeing lots of "wow!" "holy shit!" type comments.
Nobody has bothered saying why it's a bad idea. Is it because you have to temporarily put your hand in front of the muzzle? If that's the only reason, its a bad one. Are you trying to tell me you can't point your gun at ANYTHING without accidentally pulling the trigger? Jesus. |
|
Quoted:
I'm seeing lots of "wow!" "holy shit!" type comments. Nobody has bothered saying why it's a bad idea. Is it because you have to temporarily put your hand in front of the muzzle? If that's the only reason, its a bad one. Are you trying to tell me you can't point your gun at ANYTHING without accidentally pulling the trigger? Jesus. View Quote Really? You can't puzzle out why this is a bad idea? |
|
Quoted:
Actually in the position he is carrying it he will probably just blow off his asshole. Unless he has managed to create a bore obstruction already and his whole firearm kablooeys in his pants like the other poster said. Either way, I would love to tell that guy to his face he is a douche canoe. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll continue to use a corectly fitting holster for my firearm, BUT.... If someone is really looking to pull off that tucked in the pants look, this is better than nothing. Both are asking for a negligent discharge, this just supplies negligably better retention. - Nw - Actually... I would say nothing is better than this. I'd rather have an open trigger guard than an open trigger guard with something shoved down the barrel, my hands awkwardly in front of the muzzle and a rope snagging on things. But that's just me. Either way I'll stick with holsters. Isn't pointing a pistol slightly against your back to get it to go under your waistband regardless of the presence of this device just as likely to serve as a one way trip to being paralyzed? As I said, its stupid due to safety issues, but provides better retention than nothing. It sounds like we're both sold on actual, fitting, holsters regardless. We'll both be keeping al of our fingers and our ability to walk. . - Nw - Actually in the position he is carrying it he will probably just blow off his asshole. Unless he has managed to create a bore obstruction already and his whole firearm kablooeys in his pants like the other poster said. Either way, I would love to tell that guy to his face he is a douche canoe. This I agree with whole heartedly. It's been a long time since I laughed so hard I cried. - Nw - |
|
Quoted: I'm seeing lots of "wow!" "holy shit!" type comments. Nobody has bothered saying why it's a bad idea. Is it because you have to temporarily put your hand in front of the muzzle? If that's the only reason, its a bad one. Are you trying to tell me you can't point your gun at ANYTHING without accidentally pulling the trigger? Jesus. View Quote Its awkward and you cannot watch yourself install it as it is behind your back , plus your hand is in front of the muzzle during all this it would suck to have the have the string from this magically get wrapped up around the trigger during install or just during wearing/use or if the cord somehow breaks you now have a barrel obstruction |
|
|
|
|
Jesus H Tapdancing Christ! This is like one of those those shitty "as seen on TV" products.
Do you love concealed carry of your handgun, but find regular holsters too bulky, heavy, and hard to put on?
Well, you're in luck! Because now there's the Pistol Sling (tm)! But wait, there's more! Order in the next ten minutes, and we'll send you a SECOND Pistol Sling (tm) ABOLUTELY FREE! View Quote This might be the dumbest thing I've seen all week. |
|
Quoted:
I'm seeing lots of "wow!" "holy shit!" type comments. Nobody has bothered saying why it's a bad idea. Is it because you have to temporarily put your hand in front of the muzzle? If that's the only reason, its a bad one. Are you trying to tell me you can't point your gun at ANYTHING without accidentally pulling the trigger? Jesus. View Quote If you can't think of a piece of gear that is a better, safer, solution than the "handgun sling," you need to change the way you think. Here is a hint; search for Raven Concealment Vanguard. Even that excellent piece of gear has limited application. |
|
Quoted:
I'm seeing lots of "wow!" "holy shit!" type comments. Nobody has bothered saying why it's a bad idea. Is it because you have to temporarily put your hand in front of the muzzle? If that's the only reason, its a bad one. Are you trying to tell me you can't point your gun at ANYTHING without accidentally pulling the trigger? Jesus. View Quote Nothing covering the trigger for one. Complex movement to get the gun into action. Small of back is terrible location for primary carry, especially one in a loose fitting carry device. This is a terrible idea borne of the OSS shoestring holster. |
|
Quoted:
Meh, this is better: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v21/Denny347/Glock/RavenGlockThing3.jpg View Quote Carrying a gun concealed in a ziploc bag of cold ziti is probably better! |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.