Justice Neil Gorsuch didn’t wait long to start making his presence felt at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Ten minutes into his first argument as a justice, Gorsuch suggested that both sides in a case involving federal employees were misreading the key federal law.
“Where in the statute is that provided?” he asked the lawyer representing a dismissed Census Bureau worker.
It was to be the theme of the day as Gorsuch and the court heard arguments in three cases, only a week after he took the oath to fill the 14-month-old Supreme Court vacancy. Gorsuch proved to be an aggressive questioner, one tightly focused on statutory wording and perhaps even willing to start what a fellow justice described as a "revolution" in a given area of law.
Gorsuch, however, was enthusiastic as he questioned Chris Landau, the lawyer representing the dismissed Census Bureau worker. Landau asked the court to let the man’s entire suit go forward in a federal district court, rather than waiting for part of the case to be addressed first by a federal appeals court. When Landau said he wasn’t asking the court to “break any new ground,” Gorsuch gave a pointed response.
“No, just to continue to make it up,” Gorsuch said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-04-17/gorsuch-full-of-questions-in-first-u-s-supreme-court-argument