User Panel
Posted: 2/24/2016 12:32:09 PM EDT
The only thing that kept me away, up until I bought my first (G 42) was the 2x4 grip.
Yes, I'm a 1911 fanboy. I bought a G 17. I shoot it, but I still don't like it. But, I'm trying! I'm big. 6' 3"... I have large hands, and long fingers. I don't know how small people shoot them. Maybe it's my 1911 training? I'm just used to it. Whatever it is, I wish they offered one. |
|
Quoted:
The only thing that kept me away, up until I bought my first (G 42) was the 2x4 grip.Yes, I'm a 1911 fanboy. I bought a G 17. I shoot it, but I still don't like it. But, I'm trying! I'm big. 6' 3"... I have large hands, and long fingers. I don't know how small people shoot them. Maybe it's my 1911 training? I'm just used to it. Whatever it is, I wish they offered one. View Quote We don't. |
|
The Gen 4s come with a slightly skinnier grip. At less than 15 rounds it ceases to be a Wonder 9.
|
|
|
Quoted: You never heard of the G1911?http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/ae259/zdadthrice/Pistolas/glock_1911-tfb.jpg View Quote Heresy! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only thing that kept me away, up until I bought my first (G 42) was the 2x4 grip.Yes, I'm a 1911 fanboy. I bought a G 17. I shoot it, but I still don't like it. But, I'm trying! I'm big. 6' 3"... I have large hands, and long fingers. I don't know how small people shoot them. Maybe it's my 1911 training? I'm just used to it. Whatever it is, I wish they offered one. We don't. Speak for yourself. |
|
I would rather they made something larger than the G36 in a single stack 45.
|
|
A fullsize 9mm single stack is retarded. The whole point of getting a full size 9mm is the extra boolits.
If you want full size single stack stick to the 1911. |
|
|
Quoted: A fullsize 9mm single stack is retarded. The whole point of getting a full size 9mm is the extra boolits. If you want full size single stack stick to the 1911. View Quote Plus, why is it retarded to have a gun that is enjoyable to shoot? Every gun doesn't have to be a fighting gun. |
|
Dude, just get a nice 9mm 1911. Wilson (and probably others) make damn good mags for them now.
|
|
I'd buy a full sized single stack to go with my 43. We can only have 10 bulletz here anyway.
|
|
I'm 5'7" when I hired on my department had glock 20, 10 mm's. Talk about big. Was like shooting a hand cannon.
|
|
I have smallish hands and find the 9mm Glocks perfectly comfortable. The 45 Glocks on the other hand........
I just don't see a market for it. Smith continued to build single stack nines after they came out with the 59. They languished, to the point they've become minor collector's items. SIG made the 220 in 9mm. Likewise not a big seller. And 9mm 1911's don't exactly fly off the shelves either. |
|
Quoted:
I'd prefer a single stack 10, than a double stack 10. (G 26) Plus, why is it retarded to have a gun that is enjoyable to shoot? Every gun doesn't have to be a fighting gun. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
A fullsize 9mm single stack is retarded. The whole point of getting a full size 9mm is the extra boolits. If you want full size single stack stick to the 1911. Plus, why is it retarded to have a gun that is enjoyable to shoot? Every gun doesn't have to be a fighting gun. A single stack 10 would be awesome as well. |
|
|
I'm selling my G43 because the grip is too short, even with the Pearce extended magazine. Looking at the Springfield EMP4, single stack 1911 design 9mm, but built around the 9mm, not a .45 design with modified mags and barrel, et al. 10 rd. magazine. I don't like the feel of wide grips in my hand. I confess I am used to the 1911 as I have an arsenal in .45 ACP's going back to the mid 70's. I just want a 9mm without having to go with the full size 1911. Springfield seems to have nailed it with the EMP models. I also would like to see a Glock with a 10 rd. single stack and 4" barrel.
|
|
|
All R&D time is currently meeting spent on carbine development.
|
|
I think the finger grooves are useless on modern Glocks.
I'm a gorilla and can shoot my G26 if it has the grip extensions. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only thing that kept me away, up until I bought my first (G 42) was the 2x4 grip.Yes, I'm a 1911 fanboy. I bought a G 17. I shoot it, but I still don't like it. But, I'm trying! I'm big. 6' 3"... I have large hands, and long fingers. I don't know how small people shoot them. Maybe it's my 1911 training? I'm just used to it. Whatever it is, I wish they offered one. We don't. Speak for yourself. My son was shooting a G17 when he was 12 with no problems. |
|
|
Quoted: Glock 19 footprint with the 43 thickness would be awesome. View Quote The only reason that might be a mess is that he standard trigger system won't fit in a single stack width. Perhaps with the popularity of the 42 and 43, and their singlse stack trigger system size, this will be possible. If they do it right, they will release a G 44 9mm, followed by a G 45 in .45 ACP |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I agree with this, too. But, I just want a fun 9mm, since ammo is inexpensive. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I would rather they made something larger than the G36 in a single stack 45. But, I just want a fun 9mm, since ammo is inexpensive. You sound like you want a 9mm 1911. |
|
|
Quoted: You sound like you want a 9mm 1911. View Quote But, I would buy a single stack Glock first, based on simplicity and price. At $500, Glocks are more like impulse buys, and 1911 are more like planned purchased |
|
Because larger polymer single stack guns are dumb.
Lets be absolutely honest, single stack, any gun is dumb and only popular because of "ohh" 1911 and bans on guns over 10 rounds. There I said it, /flame on. |
|
Quoted: Because larger polymer single stack guns are dumb. Lets be absolutely honest, single stack, any gun is dumb and only popular because of "ohh" 1911 and bans on guns over 10 rounds. There I said it, /flame on. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
How many ccw incidents can be fired in part 10 years where more than 10 rounds were fired? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Because larger polymer single stack guns are dumb. Lets be absolutely honest, single stack, any gun is dumb and only popular because of "ohh" 1911 and bans on guns over 10 rounds. There I said it, /flame on. How about 7 rounds fired? Or 5 rounds fired? Does that mean all we need are J frames? Rather than wishing for something that isn't going happen, just dig up a 3rd Gen S&W single stack nine. |
|
Quoted:
Because larger polymer single stack guns are dumb. Lets be absolutely honest, single stack, any gun is dumb and only popular because of "ohh" 1911 and bans on guns over 10 rounds. There I said it, /flame on. View Quote Thin single stacks are fun to shoot at the range. Im not seeing an issue, because that is where the vast majority of guns actually get used. |
|
I don't understand all the picky cunts that complain about grips size/angle. I pick up a gun and shoot it, with a little time, shoot it well. What the fuck is the problem? The human hand and wrist are very adjustable.
|
|
Quoted: http://i422.photobucket.com/albums/pp310/zonker1986/Bersa/Picture168-1-1.jpg 8 round single stack Bersa BP9 next to a G19. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Rather than wishing for something that isn't going happen, just dig up a 3rd Gen S&W single stack nine. View Quote I carry a G 42, so I have 7 in the gun, and 2 mags of 6 (I don't always have the mag pouch, so you could say I carry 7 minimum). |
|
|
Just put more rounds through it. You'll get used to it.
I've got north of 80k rounds through 1911s and can shoot a g17 just fine because I've quite a few thousand rounds through those, too. (used to shoot USPSA fairly seriously, so, lots of practice) |
|
|
Quoted:
I don't understand all the picky cunts that complain about grips size/angle. I pick up a gun and shoot it, with a little time, shoot it well. What the fuck is the problem? The human hand and wrist are very adjustable. View Quote Because stupid design is stupid. Why adjust when there are 87 zillion guns that don't have stupid Quasimodo humps? |
|
Quoted:
2006 wants that joke back. lol Wish they would make a carbine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
All R&D time is currently meeting spent on carbine development. 2006 wants that joke back. lol Wish they would make a carbine. And 1996, and probably 2026. |
|
Quoted:
I'd prefer a single stack 10, than a double stack 10. (G 26) Plus, why is it retarded to have a gun that is enjoyable to shoot? Every gun doesn't have to be a fighting gun. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
A fullsize 9mm single stack is retarded. The whole point of getting a full size 9mm is the extra boolits. If you want full size single stack stick to the 1911. Plus, why is it retarded to have a gun that is enjoyable to shoot? Every gun doesn't have to be a fighting gun. Okay, I can accept that, I'm still in the process of building up my collection, so for now every gun is a fighting gun, one day I'll buy guns for shits and gigs. But not today |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.