User Panel
Posted: 9/20/2005 10:03:26 AM EDT
www.easternecho.com/cgi-bin/story.cgi?3911
|
|
|
I disagree. .50 will kill anything in North America |
|
|
Cool article. I want one!
Although, that probably wasn't the purpose of the article. |
|
Wow it can kill tanks! Must be that new Pu235 explosive space modulator they installed in them.
|
|
+1 |
||
|
Damn I didn't realize we had replaced the Javelin, TOW, and Stinger with Barretts |
|
|
Why the hell would police need a .50 sniper? Seriously, I dont see one situation where a .50 would be needed.
|
|
|
ETA: Stupid L wont strike out |
|
|
There may be real words there, but I could only decipher "blah blah blah", ad infinitum.
|
|
All stories like that make me want to do is buy an M82A1 from Mr. Barret.
|
|
It's the Army equivalent to the Navy SuperBug. Pretty soon, they'll claim the M1 Abrams can be replaced by a Jeep with a Barrett on it. |
||
|
Thousand monkies at a thousand computers approach to gun control essays. |
|
|
A: I think that they would make a fine sporting arm. This way, I can pick off Cape Buffalo with impunity before they even hear the boom. Much better than mucking about in the bush, toting a .460 Wby Mag and stumbling on an ill-tempered, near-sighted 2000lb animal. B: I think it would be excellent defense against airliners filled with islamo-facists who are intent on crashing said plane into my house. After all, they CAN shoot down planes....right? If not, it's still suitable defense against an M113 full of islamo-facsists rolling up my driveway and I am pretty certain I can "brain" a suicide driver quite some distance away from whatever check-point I decide I need to errect on my property. Sheep |
|
|
that's some funny fucking claims. I'd love to watch someone try to shoot down a flying aircraft with a barrett damage one the ground sure, even make it unable to take off due to a hole in the engine. but destroy? no while .50BMG AP might go through the armor in a thin spot on a tank, it isn't going to destroy it |
|
|
"Despite my firm agreement with the Second Amendment, there are specific cases where the right to bear certain arms is significantly more dangerous than what may happen if one could not. "
I hate liars, and all libs are just that. |
|
I was a civilian contractor for NASA, and they had me as lead door gunner on the space shuttle back in the mid 80s, and that's where I used my .50. So, there is a place in the civilian world for .50s. That guy is full of crap.
|
|
I have no use whatsoever for a .50 - and no desire to own one 'just because' - but one of these days I'm going to get sick of reading these stupid articles and go buy one just out of spite.
|
|
damn, even the barret website makes this mistake? |
||
|
|
||
|
When did they change the Shuttle Door-Gunner Issued Sidearm SOP? When I was in, we were issued SPAS-12s in drop-leg rigs. You new guys get all the cool toys. Sheep |
|
|
Why do I get the feeling that the author of this drivel has never so much as been in the same room as a real firearm, let alone actually shot one?
|
|
Same here - I think he would pee his pants if he had to be around too many guns at once. |
|
|
Well truth be told, I really want to buy a .50 cal sniper rifle just for when they get banned.
When will they get banned? Whenever a well to do upper middle class dude goes crazy and blows up police cars with a Barret. But I somehow don't see this happening to soon. Good thing! Because $7000 is a lot of pennies! I noted that the author had a same point about firearms laws that I've been bitching about: I can't buy a handgun but I can buy a .50 cal sniper rifle, haha |
|
Fixed it for you. |
||
|
So what's the problem? |
|
|
I'll take two! Shoot, there'er only $7K each. How quickly do you think I could empty that ten round mag?
|
|
Heck, the barret was designed for civilians, and the military saw the benefit of it.
Douchebag Also, it needs to be pointed out that the .50 BMG round is what, in it's 6-7th decade of existance? libtards. TXL |
|
What I find scarry is that for $7000 you could easily rent 20 white vans, fill them with gasoline and fertilizer, and blow up 20 buildings, easily killing thousands, and all you need is a drivers license. No background check, etc.
Why aren't people like him clamoring for banning rent-a-cars/gasoline/fertilizer? |
|
Because that would require the application of logic and reasoned thought instead of hysterical emotionalism. The former doesn't sell. The latter does. Unfortunately. |
|
|
Excellent point. |
|
|
Edited for OpSec. Nevermind. |
|
|
Oh that's it, seven grand? I'll have to run that by the wife. "Honey, I could get this here .50 cal for the MODEST amount of $7,000. What! What!" |
|
|
Banned in cali yep, by our own "republican" Govnu. Fucking arnold, I can't wait till you are outta there you liberal dipshit. |
|
|
Yeah, for the modest sum of 7,000 lol...thats the thing that would garentee there will never be one at my house, unless i find one in a roadside ditch. And yes I would like to have one just for grins.
but he acts like seven grand is nothing. |
|
wish I had the $7,000 & a place to shoot...other than that, I'd get one just to support Barrett for his 2nd ammendment stand!
|
|
Why do I get the feeling that the author of this drivel has never so much as been in the same room as a real firearm, let alone actually shot one?
I got the same feeling when I read "Instead of having to manually discharge the empty cartridge then load the next, you can snap off ten shots as fast as you can pull the trigger." and "With the recoil of a 12-gauge shotgun if fired from the shoulder and considerably less when fired from the stock bipod," Having actually fired an M82A1 I can tell you that you would have to have a lot of strength to shoot it from the shoulder. You could do it, but to hold it steady and aim would be nearly impossible. The only way you can shoot this thing is prone. Even though the recoil feels similar to that of a 12 ga, it has a long shove that pushes you back and off target. It takes a while to recover, reposition, aim, and fire again. Because of this, you can't "snap off ten shots as fast as you can pull the trigger." No way, not and hit what you want to hit. This guy is full of it. |
|
I'm pretty sure he pissed his skirt while writing that artical.
GM |
|
|
You still got a lot to learn kid
That'll be neat trick - anyone ever seen a car get blown up by ball ammo? |
||
|
Damn! He sounds like some of those fucking duck hunters at the shooting range. |
|
|
If 7K is a modest amount of money for a semi-auto magazine fed firearm, I'm clearly a failure in life. I've paid less than that for transportation in the last two years.
Guess I need to spend more time writing alarmist nonsense. Maybe I could earn enough doing that to afford the SEAK that I'm going to have to pass up |
|
As usual, this piece of literary marvel is simply based on emotion and invective and far short on actual facts.
Notice how he injects how scary it is?
He also is basing this on the fact that the only legal use of a firearm, and the intent of the 2nd was and is based on "hunting" only. Why would you hunt with this? Who would "need" this?
It's really sad that anybody with the ability to type can unleash this wreckless garbage and slant it on pure fearful emotion. If anything, we should have a "safety" lever against this kind of drivel. Words can be just as dangerous as firearms. See how many people have been killed over words throughout history. I have an appointment right now (wish it was with the gun shop to pick up an M82) but I plan to fire off a nasty-gram as soon as I return. This kind of crap needs to be met and challenged. I would suggest we flood him over this. Maybe fire off a letter to his editor as well. |
||
|
Looks to me like that guy is about to get a nice gash when he lights that thing off. |
|
|
Perhaps someone should tell this guy that these rifles are just
a LITTLE on the heavy and awkward side. What do they weigh like 65 pounds without a mag ? I don't see many drivebys happening with this piece. Besides that ,at $7,000 dollars for just the initial purchase of the rifle (let alone ammo,scope ETC.) anyone who needs money enough to commit armed robbery isn't going to have the cash in the first place ! Other than just a step in the direction of banning all guns,I see no valid point in the Libtards efforts to ban these. Especially since any terrorist attacks with this kind of weapon will most probably be by a weapon that's smuggled in accross the border with Mexico. |
|
So, will this slam you thumb as hard as a garand? |
|
|
Amen. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.