Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
PSA
Member Login

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 2/23/2016 3:33:57 PM EDT
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:38:33 PM EDT
Originally Posted By DaveE111:
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no
View Quote


87 days
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:39:42 PM EDT
Originally Posted By DaveE111:
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no
View Quote



87 hours.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:40:32 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/23/2016 3:41:55 PM EDT by DeltaElite777]
Which ones are up for re-election this year?  Neither of my POS RINOS are.  
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:41:22 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Medicfrost:


87 days
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Medicfrost:
Originally Posted By DaveE111:
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no


87 days



Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Originally Posted By DaveE111:
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no



87 hours.


87 Minutes
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:41:29 PM EDT
Sure they will. At least until Obama calls them meanies and hurts their feelings.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:42:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/23/2016 3:45:09 PM EDT by tcrpe]
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.

View Quote
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:43:30 PM EDT
Bidens rule....
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:44:42 PM EDT
Maine: Senator Susan Collins says YES.  Classic RHINO.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:45:15 PM EDT
it'll last till Obama nominates someone, and then hits the airwaves saying Republicans are obstructionist and stopping progress.

SJW's will freak out. McConnell will cave, and we'll have a 5/4 liberal court.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:45:35 PM EDT
I'll believe it when I see it.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:47:05 PM EDT
I might could see a compromise, especially if Obama opted to keep the courts balance by picking a like minded replacement.


BUT OBAMA NOT GOING TO THE FUNERAL. ...Well FUCK YOU MR PRESIDENT, I will not consider any of your picks.


Not going to the funeral killed all chances of a new judge under his watch. Imo
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:48:11 PM EDT
there is no winning with some of yall.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:50:37 PM EDT

standing by for the cave-in.





Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:50:51 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.



Ok.

That would be nice if you could count on anyone at that level keeping their word.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:52:17 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/23/2016 3:52:28 PM EDT by sbhaven]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.

No shit, any time they open up their mouths you have to listen (or read) what they said very carefully. The fact that they don't come out and just state; "we will not confirm anyone Obama nominates." is telling. They are leaving the door open as they always do so when they DO go and confirm Obama's nominee they'll be able to play their usual word game excuses.

Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:52:48 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By justsayin:


Ok.

That would be nice if you could count on anyone at that level keeping their word.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By justsayin:
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.



Ok.

That would be nice if you could count on anyone at that level keeping their word.


HINT: Obama will still be President until the inauguration in January.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:53:34 PM EDT
They can't do that, that's racist!
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:54:40 PM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DeltaElite777:


Which ones are up for re-election this year?  Neither of my POS RINOS are.  
View Quote
Ayotte in NH is up.

 
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:55:21 PM EDT
Originally Posted By DaveE111:
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no
View Quote


Hopefully for four years.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:55:55 PM EDT
Of all the dumb political things the Senate could do this has to be one of the worst. McConnel finally gets some balls and still will lose the political battle.  All these idiots need to do is play the game and never end up approving any nominee.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:57:10 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sbhaven:

No shit, any time they open up their mouths you have to listen (or read) what they said very carefully. The fact that they don't come out and just state; "we will not confirm anyone Obama nominates." is telling. They are leaving the door open as they always do so when they DO go and confirm Obama's nominee they'll be able to play their usual word game excuses.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sbhaven:
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.

No shit, any time they open up their mouths you have to listen (or read) what they said very carefully. The fact that they don't come out and just state; "we will not confirm anyone Obama nominates." is telling. They are leaving the door open as they always do so when they DO go and confirm Obama's nominee they'll be able to play their usual word game excuses.


Link Posted: 2/23/2016 3:59:05 PM EDT
Yeah right, we'll have a new justice before summer hits.  RINOs only know how to fail.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:00:37 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DDiggler:


HINT: Obama will still be President until the inauguration in January.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DDiggler:
Originally Posted By justsayin:
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.



Ok.

That would be nice if you could count on anyone at that level keeping their word.


HINT: Obama will still be President until the inauguration in January.

DOH!

Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:01:09 PM EDT
It'll pick up steam after Super Tuesday, which should come close to deciding the nominees.  The fight will play out during the main election.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:03:15 PM EDT
Sure, I believe it.

Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:04:20 PM EDT
The rinos lie.  Don't believe what they say.  They are afraid to actually hurt the black potus.  When the black potus makes a choice they will pussyfy and hold the hearings and agree with the black potus.  They don't want to be seen as mean people or racists.  They are all traitors and need to be removed and replaced with real americans.

I despise them.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:05:29 PM EDT
There's plenty of precedent for not confirming a lame duck's nominees. Democrats, including obongo, did it to Bush for 18 months.


1911fan
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:05:29 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tcrpe:

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Originally Posted By sbhaven:
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.

No shit, any time they open up their mouths you have to listen (or read) what they said very carefully. The fact that they don't come out and just state; "we will not confirm anyone Obama nominates." is telling. They are leaving the door open as they always do so when they DO go and confirm Obama's nominee they'll be able to play their usual word game excuses.





If the Democrats prevail, then after the election they will have to decide which would be worse - an Obama nominee or a Clinton/Sanders nominee. (November or January)
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:06:45 PM EDT
The word of the GOP has a negative intrest rate
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:07:45 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By far_right:
there is no winning with some of yall.
View Quote

Yup.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:09:02 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DDiggler:


HINT: Obama will still be President until the inauguration in January.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DDiggler:
Originally Posted By justsayin:
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.



Ok.

That would be nice if you could count on anyone at that level keeping their word.


HINT: Obama will still be President until the inauguration in January.
HINT: Supreme Court justices are not approved over night.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:09:17 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By VACaver:
I'll believe it when I see it.
View Quote




This . I fully expect the republicans to have a liberal replacement on the bench by the end of summer at the latest . What you are watching is political theater where everyone knows the outcome
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:10:13 PM EDT

Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:11:37 PM EDT
If the Republicans had any balls they would have hearings and Bork the fuck out of whatever libtard FBHO nominated, followed by a HELL NO! vote.



If.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:11:49 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By kendwell:
Maine: Senator Susan Collins says YES.  Classic RHINO.
View Quote



QFT
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:18:19 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By crashburnrepeat:
it'll last till Obama nominates someone, and then hits the airwaves saying Republicans are obstructionist and stopping progress.

SJW's will freak out. McConnell will cave, and we'll have a 5/4 liberal court.
View Quote


Why?  The GOP has been getting called obstructionist since they took the Senate.

It's up to Obama to nominate someone who has a snowball's chance of getting approved by a GOP Senate if he wants to put another justice on the court.   Granted, the Demmos started this shit by shit-canning Bork.  There is no reason, none, for the GOP to approve a liberal justice.  None.  Potential 4-4 votes on the court just means some lower court decisions will stand.  
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:19:42 PM EDT
Originally Posted By DaveE111:
How long will they hold out?

Senate says no
View Quote



A few more days and then they will cave.






Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:20:09 PM EDT
They will hold out till Trump wins the nomination....Then pick some half-baked "moderate" minority the Halfrican puts forward.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:20:33 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By kendwell:
Maine: Senator Susan Collins says YES.  Classic RHINO.
View Quote


Republican Hardly In Name Only?
Republican Handily In Name Only?
Republican Hand IN Obama?
Racially Handsome In New Orleans?
Readily Holding Isotopes In Nuclear Ordeals?
Redheads Handling Idols of Netherland Origin?
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:24:36 PM EDT
I e-mail Grassley daily to stand fast until next year. He's up for re-election, fwiw.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:25:11 PM EDT
That would be very comforting ... if politicians didn't have a reputation for saying one thing and then doing the exact opposite.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:27:02 PM EDT

BORK . . . . . . BORK . . . . . . BORK . . . . . . BORK . . . . . . BORK . . . . . . BORK . . . . . .


Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:29:50 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Just1ce:


Republican Hardly In Name Only?
Republican Handily In Name Only?
Republican Hand IN Obama?
Racially Handsome In New Orleans?
Readily Holding Isotopes In Nuclear Ordeals?
Redheads Handling Idols of Netherland Origin?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Just1ce:
Originally Posted By kendwell:
Maine: Senator Susan Collins says YES.  Classic RHINO.


Republican Hardly In Name Only?
Republican Handily In Name Only?
Republican Hand IN Obama?
Racially Handsome In New Orleans?
Readily Holding Isotopes In Nuclear Ordeals?
Redheads Handling Idols of Netherland Origin?


Republican herpa in name only.

Link Posted: 2/23/2016 4:43:22 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By NRA2:
Of all the dumb political things the Senate could do this has to be one of the worst. McConnel finally gets some balls and still will lose the political battle.  All these idiots need to do is play the game and never end up approving any nominee.
View Quote


Obama will pick someone from an oppressed group (black lesbian for example) and claim the republicans are denying confirmation because they're bigots.  That kind of BS gets the SJW crowd to the polls.

By categorically denying any Obama appointee before he even names one, there is no opportunity to pull the race card.  They've already confirmed 2 Obama justices, so he can't claim it's personal against him.


Unfortunately, this doesn't work on people who are immune to logic, so it doesn't matter what the Republicans do;  the media will wail and the SJWs will stomp their feet.
Fuck-em.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 5:06:19 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cedjunior:
HINT: Supreme Court justices are not approved over night.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cedjunior:
Originally Posted By DDiggler:
Originally Posted By justsayin:
Originally Posted By tcrpe:
Read this part very carefully:

Earlier in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead "revisit the matter" after the presidential election in November.



Ok.

That would be nice if you could count on anyone at that level keeping their word.


HINT: Obama will still be President until the inauguration in January.
HINT: Supreme Court justices are not approved over night.


I don't care if it takes a year, if it's a nominee that Obama picked. I'd rather hear that they will not vote on any Obama appointees, period.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 5:20:34 PM EDT
Funny how the Dems and their controlled media whores (those who now pose as "journalists") forget how they acted in 1991:





http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/23/us/politics/joe-biden-argued-for-delaying-supreme-court-picks-in-1992.html?_r=0





http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/22/why-senate-republicans-plan-to-follow-joe-bidens-advice-on-the-supreme-court-vacancy/





The Dems set the stage too for how a SC nominee should be treated like during the Bork and Thomas witch hunt-like tribunals.





http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/16/10-times-democrats-vowed-to-block-republican-nominees/





Of course very little of this SC nominee history will be reported by the controlled media in the upcoming months, it will be all about how bad the Republicans are for not giving FBHO another SCJ...its up to us to get these facts out via social media and set the record and history straight.

 
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 5:22:30 PM EDT

They are holding out for a deal.


Maybe they each get get to lick Obama smegma butter


Link Posted: 2/23/2016 5:24:01 PM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Smash47:


Funny how the Dems and their controlled media whores (those who now pose as "journalists") forget how they acted in 1991:



http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/23/us/politics/joe-biden-argued-for-delaying-supreme-court-picks-in-1992.html?_r=0



http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/22/why-senate-republicans-plan-to-follow-joe-bidens-advice-on-the-supreme-court-vacancy/



The Dems set the stage too for how a SC nominee should be treated like during the Bork and Thomas witch hunt-like tribunals.



http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/16/10-times-democrats-vowed-to-block-republican-nominees/



Of course very little of this SC nominee history will be reported by the controlled media in the upcoming months, it will be all about how bad the Republicans are for not giving FBHO another SCJ...its up to us to get these facts out via social media and set the record and history straight.  
View Quote
Talk radio keeps running the 1992(?) Biden speech telling Bush not to select a justice



 
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 5:24:03 PM EDT
Now is not the time to be drawing lines in the sand, now is the time push like hell for a solid compromise nomination.  After that, drag it out for the elections.
Link Posted: 2/23/2016 5:25:08 PM EDT
They will cave in 4 weeks.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Top Top