Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 10/23/2016 6:31:53 PM EDT
So IMHO, the amazing thing about this piece is that it was carried by Huffpo.

Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:32:29 PM EDT
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:33:16 PM EDT
HuffPo wrote that?

Was one of their staff on her period and angry at her workplace?


Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:37:05 PM EDT
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:38:07 PM EDT
Originally Posted By bruzz123:
So IMHO, the amazing thing about this piece is that it was carried by Huffpo.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-morocco-emails_us_580cd86be4b0a03911ed5e27

View Quote



Dont click it, you know what it says, here is a quote:

In the beforetime, in the long, long ago of 2015, a woman named Hillary Clinton was about to launch her campaign for president. She was also trying really hard to secure $12 million for her family’s charitable foundation from King Mohammed VI of Morocco. And her campaign was freaking out about it.

Campaign manager Robby Mook and longtime Clinton confidant John Podesta thought the deal ? in which Clinton had committed to speak at an event for the king on the condition of his $12 million donation ? would look bad. Clinton aide Huma Abedin tried to explain that it was simply too late to back out.

“This was HRC’s idea,” Abedin wrote in an email to Podesta. “Our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting. It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months.”

The team eventually reached a compromise. Hillary Clinton didn’t show up, but Bill Clinton and Chelsea Clinton did, and the money came through.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:39:57 PM EDT
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:40:08 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BGENE:
Dirty deeds and their done (not cheap)
View Quote


right, i know this was covered. but when the huffpo agrees with fox, that's a twist to the story that i did not see coming.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:41:23 PM EDT
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:42:00 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/23/2016 6:43:31 PM EDT by Foxnews_FTW]
Huffington post wrote that?


Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:43:15 PM EDT
Read the replies. They dont care.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:49:41 PM EDT
Her voters don't care. It is sad that they've embraced such a corrupt, evil, lying cunt.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:51:00 PM EDT
Social media/low IQ/FSA/me me me voters don't give a shit about this kind of thing.

To them, this election isn't about politics and corruption. It's about what can THEY get out of it for themselves. It's about heartstrings and promises that don't mean a thing when it comes to building a strong nation.

They don't mind if a candidate is corrupt. This won't go anywhere to sway the voters that typically vote dem.

Sensational news stories that layman (Hillary) voters understand are what drives the stupidity of this nation. They get all up in arms about someone grabbing someone else by the pussy, or nude photos from the past. It's all about "bigly", and other words that are apparently important to running a country.

It's what idiots hear on Facebook that drives Hillary voters. Not the important stuff like high-level corruption.

It's sad times we live in.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:57:14 PM EDT
They have to write at least one piece....you know....just in case.

No one will read it....no one will believe it....with the morals and ethics of the democrats they don't even have the capacity to believe they've done anything wrong.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 6:59:35 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?
View Quote


It is....
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:00:54 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JLH3:
Read the replies. They dont care.
View Quote
You'd think CTR would be busy somewhere else instead of preaching to the choir
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:16:59 PM EDT
well they see the writing on the wall and want to stay open once trump cleans out the media once he's president
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:19:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/23/2016 7:20:40 PM EDT by FlyingGorilla]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?
View Quote



You'll never hear that story on Sheppard Smith or Megyn Kelly's programs unless the water is dark red with blood. The rest of the programs might cover it before then.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:21:27 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JLH3:
Read the replies. They dont care.
View Quote

yep they could care less."it happened after she was security of state"
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:22:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/23/2016 7:23:02 PM EDT by Cucumbermonkey]
I grabbed this in another thread. Did Huffpo mention the sale of TOW missles?

Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:24:27 PM EDT
This is the best government money can buy .,. America= Third world status achieved
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:24:50 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?
View Quote


See, here is the thing about that,

FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;

Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.

One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.

So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:25:35 PM EDT
In for the huffpo suicide watch.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:28:35 PM EDT
Most people won't care, its for her "charitable foundation," of course she's raising money for it.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:34:26 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jaqufrost:
Most people won't care, its for her "charitable foundation," of course she's raising money for it.
View Quote

yes and almost 6% of what is raised goes to "charities"
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:36:30 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JLH3:
Read the replies. They dont care.
View Quote



They don't. No amount of corruption or incompetence could sway them. They are deeply, completely in love with her, just like they're in love with obama. The world could (and will) come crashing down around our ears and they will still love them unconditionally.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:39:20 PM EDT
RIP Huffpo Reporter
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:49:53 PM EDT
Originally Posted By agillig:

But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?
View Quote

The real shock is that Bob Woodward called it corrupt.  Of course Juan Williams stayed the course as a Hillary shill.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:55:49 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mariner82:

The real shock is that Bob Woodward called it corrupt.  Of course Juan Williams stayed the course as a Hillary shill.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mariner82:
Originally Posted By agillig:

But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?

The real shock is that Bob Woodward called it corrupt.  Of course Juan Williams stayed the course as a Hillary shill.



I saw that and was like
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 7:56:30 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By dirtyboy:
Her voters don't care. It is sad that they've embraced such a corrupt, evil, lying cunt.
View Quote


Didnt you hear? Trump said "pussy"!
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:05:27 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Bones45:



They don't. No amount of corruption or incompetence could sway them. They are deeply, completely in love with her, just like they're in love with obama. The world could (and will) come crashing down around our ears and they will still love them unconditionally.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Bones45:
Originally Posted By JLH3:
Read the replies. They dont care.



They don't. No amount of corruption or incompetence could sway them. They are deeply, completely in love with her, just like they're in love with obama. The world could (and will) come crashing down around our ears and they will still love them unconditionally.



The comments are frickin' scary. They are drunk with her cleverness......she got $12M from some Morrocan bigwig and she unselfishly used that cash to get AIDS drugs for African peasants. They think she is fucking awesome.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:06:17 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cobalty2004:
HuffPo wrote that?

Was one of their staff on her period and angry at her workplace?

View Quote
One of them?

Synchronized bleeding of the entire editorial staff will do that to a place.

Articles like this will result.

They'll be regretful and vow not to do it again in a week.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:08:19 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By guntrk:



See, here is the thing about that,


FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;


Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.


One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.


So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By guntrk:
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?



See, here is the thing about that,


FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;


Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.


One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.


So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.


Can we stop pretending that either Fox or Trump are actually conservative?
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:11:24 PM EDT
They could post live videos of sHitlery cutting up and eating live puppies for breakfast and the dumb masses wouldn't care.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:15:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/23/2016 8:16:00 PM EDT by Mulk]
The comment section is impressive deflection. So what? A country where the average person makes six grand a year on average gave the Clinton Foundation twelve million bucks. Ands that doesn't seem odd at all. Nope, not at all wierd....

Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:31:33 PM EDT
Bob Woodward, Lib from Watergate scandal, even says in the article that the Clinton Foundation is corrupt. Lol
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:40:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/23/2016 8:41:26 PM EDT by DOBERMAN]
Omg. Real journalism. How about the arms deal afterwards
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:44:27 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DOBERMAN:
Omg. Real journalism. How about the arms deal afterwards
View Quote


lol. they can afford real journalism now, after all the BS thats been flying around has had time to do its work. the truth likely wont matter now, and so now they can try to claim theres no agenda
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 8:50:07 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By guntrk:



See, here is the thing about that,


FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;


Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.


One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.


So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By guntrk:
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?



See, here is the thing about that,


FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;


Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.


One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.


So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.


Does this mean the Tantaros might come back!?!

I miss the funbags on that hosehound...
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 2:51:06 AM EDT
Hard to believe huffpro carried that
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 3:19:00 AM EDT
So Morocco gives the clintons $12 million, but the US Taxpayer (at the behest of the state department) gave Morocco $52 million.

http://us-foreign-aid.insidegov.com/q/118/1590/How-much-money-does-the-U-S-give-to-Morocco

Not a bad way for the clintons to milk the American Taxpayer.

And they give Trump a hard time for minimizing his tax burden.
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 3:23:23 AM EDT
I am sure the FBI and DOJ are all over this....
No wait. We no longer have a legitimate Govrnment, or rule of law.

What shoes did Hillary wear today?

Link Posted: 10/24/2016 4:31:24 AM EDT
Drain the swamp
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 6:11:01 AM EDT
Wasn't there a writer for Huff who got fed up with their shit and wrote some triggering stuff, which led to his immediate termination and scrubbing of previous works? I remember seeing that a few months ago.
Maybe another door slam by a writer?
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 6:17:33 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/24/2016 6:19:19 AM EDT by Mech2007]

Wait! So Hillary IS crooked after all?




Next you'll be telling me that Bill and the AG weren't just swapping grandchild pictures on the tarmac right before the FBI decided not to go after Hillary!!!

Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:11:28 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By guntrk:



See, here is the thing about that,


FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;


Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.


One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.


So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By guntrk:
Originally Posted By agillig:
But...I thought Fox News was in the tank for Hillary?



See, here is the thing about that,


FOX is screwed after the election if Trumps loses, here is why;


Trump,Roger Ailes,Steve O, Bannon are going to start up a new Conservative Cable channel.


One without Cheetos eating dipshits crying every other day.


So, maybe they are hedging their bets and trying to shore up points.


O'Reilly has been talking retirement for a few months.
I wonder if he's in on it.
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:16:45 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cucumbermonkey:
I grabbed this in another thread. Did Huffpo mention the sale of TOW missles?

http://i68.tinypic.com/ygigw.jpg
View Quote


Did democratic voters care when Bill Clinton gave restricted missile technology to China in the 1990s?

No.

And they aren't going to give a shit about this either.

As long as they have their welfare and free shit, that's all they care about. That and "First Woman President!" so we can keep on being fashionable and trendy while the
Republic collapses in ruin.
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:22:27 AM EDT
Check out cnn's "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!" version of this story.
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:26:14 AM EDT
If she didn't own the FBI she'd currently be out on bail.
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:27:16 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WinstonSmith:
Check out cnn's "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!" version of this story.
View Quote
CNN has dropped any pretense of fairness or impartiality. They have just gone 100% in for Clinton openly.
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:30:17 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dr_Dickie:
CNN has dropped any pretense of fairness or impartiality. They have just gone 100% in for Clinton openly.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dr_Dickie:
Originally Posted By WinstonSmith:
Check out cnn's "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!" version of this story.
CNN has dropped any pretense of fairness or impartiality. They have just gone 100% in for Clinton openly.


Your post is correct, except for one clarification.

THEY DID THAT 20 YEARS AGO, FOR THE "FIRST" CLINTON.

God, this is NEWS to people? Really?
Link Posted: 10/24/2016 8:31:57 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 6winchester2:


Your post is correct, except for one clarification.

THEY DID THAT 20 YEARS AGO, FOR THE "FIRST" CLINTON.

God, this is NEWS to people? Really?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 6winchester2:
Originally Posted By Dr_Dickie:
Originally Posted By WinstonSmith:
Check out cnn's "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!" version of this story.
CNN has dropped any pretense of fairness or impartiality. They have just gone 100% in for Clinton openly.


Your post is correct, except for one clarification.

THEY DID THAT 20 YEARS AGO, FOR THE "FIRST" CLINTON.

God, this is NEWS to people? Really?


I remember watching some documentary where a person from CNN was being interviewed himself, and he was saying back in the 90's how Bill's election was a turning point for CNN. "We discovered that, for the first time, we were responsible for getting a president elected."
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Top Top