Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 6/4/2010 8:28:00 AM EST
http://interactive.foxnews.com/livestream/live.html?chanId=1





Should be pretty cool, hopefully no kaboom.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:31:02 AM EST
[#1]
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:32:10 AM EST
[#2]
Oh......that's a no go.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:32:28 AM EST
[#3]
No Go launch aborted.


Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:32:54 AM EST
[#4]
Aint nothing happening. Shut dwn at start up.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:33:30 AM EST
[#5]
Posted June 04, 2010 10:30 Pacific Time

It looks as if we may have experienced a shutdown condition just after ignition. In these situations the vehicle puts itself into “safe mode”. There may be the chance to “recycle” the count and try again.


http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:33:57 AM EST
[#6]
Another failure for Obama - he is shutting down the space shuttle program to replace it with something that doesn't work.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:34:45 AM EST
[#7]
Quoted:
Another failure for Obama - he is shutting down the space shuttle program to replace it with something that doesn't work.


This
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:35:44 AM EST
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Another failure for Obama - he is shutting down the space shuttle program to replace it with something that doesn't work.


This


This has nothing to do with the replacement for the shuttle.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:36:54 AM EST
[#9]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Another failure for Obama - he is shutting down the space shuttle program to replace it with something that doesn't work.


This


This has nothing to do with the replacement for the shuttle.


This IS Obamas Shuttle replacement.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:37:34 AM EST
[#10]
I did hear the reporter say that they will try to get it up in the air today. I'll bump the thread if anything exciting happens
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:38:32 AM EST
[#11]
nevermind.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:40:31 AM EST
[#12]



Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

Another failure for Obama - he is shutting down the space shuttle program to replace it with something that doesn't work.




This




This has nothing to do with the replacement for the shuttle.




This IS Obamas Shuttle replacement.







 
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:40:59 AM EST
[#13]
Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?


I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.

We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 8:51:44 AM EST
[#14]




Quoted:



Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?




I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.



We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.




Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program.  We needed NASA back in the day.  The future is private enterprise.  It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town.  Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.



Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:00:16 AM EST
[#15]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?


I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.

We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.


Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program.  We needed NASA back in the day.  The future is private enterprise.  It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town.  Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.

Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.


With the way things are layed out right now NASA will not have any spacecraft let alone robotic ones.
How is it a private-enteprise if it is being done under .gov contracts?
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:24:30 AM EST
[#16]
They are going for it again at 1430 est
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:27:27 AM EST
[#17]
Now 1445.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:30:01 AM EST
[#18]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?


I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.

We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.


Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program.  We needed NASA back in the day.  The future is private enterprise.  It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town.  Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.

Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.


You owe me a new monitor.  "Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft." damn man, Baghdad Bob would be proud!  Did you manage to type it with a straight face?
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:30:17 AM EST
[#19]
is the above link to a live cam of the launch pad the only one out there? or is there a better link?
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:32:15 AM EST
[#20]
restarted countdown
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:34:06 AM EST
[#21]




Quoted:

is the above link to a live cam of the launch pad the only one out there? or is there a better link?


Chris_C posted a link from Spacex  which is a better feed than Fox. Both are live and streaming.Looks like they cancelled the hold and the clock is on count down right now -15:00 and counting.

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:37:56 AM EST
[#22]
Quoted:

Quoted:
is the above link to a live cam of the launch pad the only one out there? or is there a better link?

Chris_C posted a link from Spacex  which is a better feed than Fox. Both are live and streaming.Looks like they cancelled the hold and the clock is on count down right now -15:00 and counting.


THX!  Didn't see that link. Much better now.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:38:43 AM EST
[#23]
Quoted:
aborted at :02


It's a "choice"
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:40:08 AM EST
[#24]
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:41:04 AM EST
[#25]
4 Minutes to launch...  what is on this?

ETA - just a test flight (I assume no cargo)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/04/AR2010060403360.html
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:43:39 AM EST
[#26]
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:44:49 AM EST
[#27]
Stream is dead.



/.'d
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:46:19 AM EST
[#28]
It fo'd.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:47:19 AM EST
[#29]
Video/Audio fail.  
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:47:46 AM EST
[#30]
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:48:06 AM EST
[#31]
Second stage deployed






ETA

Looks like Fox news is getting the stream from Spacex. The buffering is teh sux. Third and final stage deployed it is in orbit @ + 8:49:39
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:49:06 AM EST
[#32]



Quoted:


4 Minutes to launch...  what is on this?



ETA - just a test flight (I assume no cargo)



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/04/AR2010060403360.html


Just a dummy payload; not even a cubesat.


 
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:50:03 AM EST
[#33]
Dang it!  I had to do some work that made me clear my running apps.  Missed it by 2 minutes...
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:50:26 AM EST
[#34]
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:51:31 AM EST
[#35]




Quoted:



Quoted:





Quoted:



Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?




I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.



We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.




Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program. We needed NASA back in the day. The future is private enterprise. It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town. Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.



Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.




With the way things are layed out right now NASA will not have any spacecraft let alone robotic ones.

How is it a private-enteprise if it is being done under .gov contracts?


Lockheed

Hughes

Boeing

Blackwater

Halliburton



Etc.

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:52:42 AM EST
[#36]
This is pretty damn cool. How soon until we have colonies orbiting Earth?
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:53:39 AM EST
[#37]




Quoted:



Quoted:





Quoted:



Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?




I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.



We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.




Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program. We needed NASA back in the day. The future is private enterprise. It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town. Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.



Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.




With the way things are layed out right now NASA will not have any spacecraft let alone robotic ones.

How is it a private-enteprise if it is being done under .gov contracts?


Because not all orbital launches are gov contracts.

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:53:55 AM EST
[#38]

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:54:09 AM EST
[#39]
All you doom and gloomers, it launched and didn't blow up!

Most rocket models fail on their first attempt.  Space X is hoping that the first stage at least works properly, so that's ultimately the litmus test.  If they get the capsule up into a 250km orbit, it's a total success and quite rare for an initial flight.

Chris
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:54:33 AM EST
[#40]



Quoted:





Quoted:


Quoted:




Quoted:


Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?




I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.



We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.




Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program. We needed NASA back in the day. The future is private enterprise. It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town. Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.



Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.




With the way things are layed out right now NASA will not have any spacecraft let alone robotic ones.

How is it a private-enteprise if it is being done under .gov contracts?


Lockheed

Hughes

Boeing

Blackwater

Halliburton



Etc.



Don't forget USA. How is it any different than how we're doing it now?

 
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 9:55:42 AM EST
[#41]
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:04:49 AM EST
[#42]
Quoted:
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.


With private money?

I didn't know that.

Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:07:35 AM EST
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.


With private money?

I didn't know that.

Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.



SpaceX is in part funded by your tax dollar as well.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:12:24 AM EST
[#44]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.


With private money?

I didn't know that.

Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.



SpaceX is in part funded by your tax dollar as well.


NASA is paying for most of it. By most I mean like 95%.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:13:25 AM EST
[#45]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.


With private money?

I didn't know that.

Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.



SpaceX is in part funded by your tax dollar as well.


Wait a minute...I thought I read on yahoo.com that the founder of paypal.com used 100% of his own money for this.

I guess I got bad gouge.

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:14:57 AM EST
[#46]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.


With private money?

I didn't know that.

Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.



SpaceX is in part funded by your tax dollar as well.


NASA is paying for most of it. By most I mean like 95%.


I knew we were paying for some of it, but 95%?  

So much for private space enterprise.  
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:15:12 AM EST
[#47]
Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Some of you guys sound like the buttwipes who blame Bush for everything. C'mon, really? Obama's fault?


I don't blame Obama for the failure to launch - I blame Obama for canceling a working program without a working replacement.

We will soon lose our space dominance & we become dependent on the Russians/Chinese to put our people in space.


Neither Russia nor China can compete with a profitable private-enterprise space program. We needed NASA back in the day. The future is private enterprise. It's in its infancy now, but will soon become the only game in town. Military contracts for near-earth and synchronous orbit satellites, space tourism, and eventually, asteroid mining, will all lead to the future generations of space vehicles.

Anything that NASA needs to do can now be done remotely, using robotic spacecraft.


With the way things are layed out right now NASA will not have any spacecraft let alone robotic ones.
How is it a private-enteprise if it is being done under .gov contracts?

Lockheed
Hughes
Boeing
Blackwater
Halliburton

Etc.

Don't forget USA. How is it any different than how we're doing it now?  


Thats what I'm talking about. There is no difference other than Shuttle components are reused multiple times less the external tank.

If you think this is not just another .gov contractor in the making you are mistaken. Obama and his puppet boy Bolden are making this sound like they are  privatizing space while shutting down a program that was a little behind schedule because there was never any budget for it. Musk told cflnews13 that he would hire KSC workers after congress approves NASA's budget but he can't at this time because of congressional debates and NASA budget bickering, sounds like a contractor to me. As of now Congress is not going to vote on NASA's budget because of the election year which means continueing resolutiuon for NASA in 2011 and 2 flt's left for shuttle and then nothing.
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:15:25 AM EST
[#48]







Quoted:
Quoted:



Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.

With private money?
I didn't know that.
Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.




Apparently there is a lot you do not know if you did not know it was funded with tax money - not that it matters who funded it - putting a satellite in LEO is not exactly a technical breakthrough.




http://www.spacex.com/cotsd.php






Wednesday, February 11th, 2009






This will be a very big year for SpaceX and the NASA Commercial
Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program.  In 2006, SpaceX won the
NASA COTS competition to demonstrate transport of cargo and optionally
crew to and from the International Space Station.  Under that agreement,
SpaceX will conduct the second flight of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle
and first flight of its Dragon spacecraft in 2009.  The final flight,
scheduled for 2010, will demonstrate Dragon's ability to berth with the
Space Station.







Immediately thereafter, SpaceX will begin conducting the first of 12
operational cargo flights to the Space Station, awarded under the Cargo
Resupply Services contract a few months ago.  The CRS contract has a
minimum value of $1.6B and a maximum value of $3.1B
and, as stated by
NASA, its success is vital to the future of the Space Station.


 
Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:18:57 AM EST
[#49]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow, the did what the Russians could do 60 years ago.


With private money?

I didn't know that.

Cool. I thought the russians used that thing called Communisim to pay for it.



SpaceX is in part funded by your tax dollar as well.


NASA is paying for most of it. By most I mean like 95%.


I knew we were paying for some of it, but 95%?  

So much for private space enterprise.  


What was the orginization a few years back, the Xprize? Was that? Where someone paid 10,000,000.00 for the first private individual to get into space? Branson and his guys from Virgin..?

Link Posted: 6/4/2010 10:52:52 AM EST
[#50]



Quoted:


All you doom and gloomers, it launched and didn't blow up!



Most rocket models fail on their first attempt.  Space X is hoping that the first stage at least works properly, so that's ultimately the litmus test.  If they get the capsule up into a 250km orbit, it's a total success and quite rare for an initial flight.



Chris


If only Big-0 had realized that before canning the Constelation program after one launch.



 
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top