Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 8/4/2005 8:13:16 AM EDT
Mike DeWine
Diane Feinstein
Ted Kennedy
Charles Schumer


Poll inbound.

Who is the most evil? I say it is DeWeinstein, because he is a REPUBLICAN (yeah right) who acts like an Evil dem.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:13:41 AM EDT
Ted fucking Kennedy
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:13:59 AM EDT

<---

Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:15:29 AM EDT

Originally Posted By MrClean4Hire:
Ted fucking Kennedy



+1
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:20:26 AM EDT
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:20:31 AM EDT
Kennedy. The rest are riding his coattails.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:31:23 AM EDT
I will disagree with the trend.

I think Kennedy has become a parody of himself… laughable and sad at the same time. Nobody but the extreme left even hears him anymore.

Feinstein is a predictable persistent and ineffective irritant and therefore not a serious threat.

DeWine is irrelevant.

Chucky Shumer is a criminally stupid and silly most of the time.

You left out the obvious choice… the Hildabeast. She is the truly dangerous threat out there.

Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:38:08 AM EDT
Roy Slade.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:44:48 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:
I will disagree with the trend.

I think Kennedy has become a parody of himself… laughable and sad at the same time. Nobody but the extreme left even hears him anymore.

Feinstein is a predictable persistent and ineffective irritant and therefore not a serious threat.

DeWine is irrelevant.

Chucky Shumer is a criminally stupid and silly most of the time.

You left out the obvious choice… the Hildabeast. She is the truly dangerous threat out there.




But which one of these choices has murdered/killed someone.

Kennedy gets my vote.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:46:20 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/4/2005 8:49:28 AM EDT by HardShell]
Sadly, I don't believe any of those mentioned are evil*... ... as much as I'd really like to.

I believe that they really, actually, honestly believe in all of the crap that they put forth - which makes them horribly misguided, but not evil.


* Doctrinal note: I believe that we are all "evil," i.e. totally depraved; above I was referring to the context of this question, i.e. their actions in trying to deprive us of our rights.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:46:25 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/4/2005 8:46:35 AM EDT by PBIR]
Me, haven't you seen my middle signature?
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:47:23 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/4/2005 8:47:48 AM EDT by BlackDog714]
I cant believe you forgot Janet Reno...

She did kill all those people in Waco
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:48:51 AM EDT

Originally Posted By purplecheese:

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:
I will disagree with the trend.

I think Kennedy has become a parody of himself… laughable and sad at the same time. Nobody but the extreme left even hears him anymore.

Feinstein is a predictable persistent and ineffective irritant and therefore not a serious threat.

DeWine is irrelevant.

Chucky Shumer is a criminally stupid and silly most of the time.

You left out the obvious choice… the Hildabeast. She is the truly dangerous threat out there.




But which one of these choices has murdered/killed someone.

Kennedy gets my vote.



Lets ask Vince Foster...
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:49:38 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/4/2005 8:50:18 AM EDT by PBIR]

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:

Originally Posted By purplecheese:

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:
I will disagree with the trend.

I think Kennedy has become a parody of himself… laughable and sad at the same time. Nobody but the extreme left even hears him anymore.

Feinstein is a predictable persistent and ineffective irritant and therefore not a serious threat.

DeWine is irrelevant.

Chucky Shumer is a criminally stupid and silly most of the time.

You left out the obvious choice… the Hildabeast. She is the truly dangerous threat out there.




good point

But which one of these choices has murdered/killed someone.

Kennedy gets my vote.



Lets ask Vince Foster...



Good Point. Klinton wins, all the rest are just evil-lite.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:51:29 AM EDT

Originally Posted By purplecheese:

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:
I will disagree with the trend.

I think Kennedy has become a parody of himself… laughable and sad at the same time. Nobody but the extreme left even hears him anymore.

Feinstein is a predictable persistent and ineffective irritant and therefore not a serious threat.

DeWine is irrelevant.

Chucky Shumer is a criminally stupid and silly most of the time.

You left out the obvious choice… the Hildabeast. She is the truly dangerous threat out there.




But which one of these choices has murdered/killed someone.

Kennedy gets my vote.



But that has been the albatross around his neck. Funny how it kept him from ever being POTUS yet the fools of his state offer him the booby prize of the role of senator.

I am confined to the limits of the poll and pick Schumer.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:52:50 AM EDT
None of them are "evil". They hold a different political opinion, as people are free to do in this country. That doesn't make them "evil".
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:56:08 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Collin:
Mike DeWine
Diane Feinstein
Ted Kennedy
Charles Schumer


Poll inbound.

Who is the most evil? I say it is DeWeinstein, because he is a REPUBLICAN (yeah right) who acts like an Evil dem.




Easy. Teddy.

See: Chappaquiddick
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:57:54 AM EDT

Originally Posted By tc556guy:
None of them are "evil". They hold a different political opinion, as people are free to do in this country. That doesn't make them "evil".




They are evil because they seek to do harm to other to the American people through their socialistic and tyrannical legislation.

In this case, different = EVIL.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:10:37 AM EDT
I'm going to disagree with the 'conventional wisdom' here...

Kennedy is the LEAST evil.

At least with him you can say he's dumb because he's drunk.

At the very least, he's smarter than the people who elect him...
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:13:31 AM EDT

Originally Posted By PBIR:

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:

Originally Posted By purplecheese:

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:





good point

But which one of these choices has murdered/killed someone.

Kennedy gets my vote.



Lets ask Vince Foster...



Good Point. Klinton wins, all the rest are just evil-lite.



Just one calorie, not evil enough...
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:20:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/4/2005 9:26:29 AM EDT by pale_pony]
I can't vote "Evil" on any of those listed...

Bumbling, fuq-headed idiots like "Chuck-the-Fuq", "FineSwine", sure, but Hitlery can teach them all about evil. Those listed are just lap-dogs for the others who are PURE EVIL and those same idiots will be crushed-out like cigarette butts when they have outlived their usefullness to the Evil Masters that they serve.

Edited to add: If you haven't read "The Truth About Hillary" by Edward Klein, you need to before the campaigning starts again...
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:24:13 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:
I will disagree with the trend.

I think Kennedy has become a parody of himself… laughable and sad at the same time. Nobody but the extreme left even hears him anymore.

Feinstein is a predictable persistent and ineffective irritant and therefore not a serious threat.

DeWine is irrelevant.

Chucky Shumer is a criminally stupid and silly most of the time.

You left out the obvious choice… the Hildabeast. She is the truly dangerous threat out there.




smart man, max mike good point
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:24:45 AM EDT

Originally Posted By chuckhammer:

Originally Posted By tc556guy:
None of them are "evil". They hold a different political opinion, as people are free to do in this country. That doesn't make them "evil".




They are evil because they seek to do harm to other to the American people through their socialistic and tyrannical legislation.

In this case, different = EVIL.


They don't "seek to do harm". They have a different opinion on how to deal with a particular issue. Thats it. Congressional types are not "seeking to do harm". You make them out to be some sort of monster. It may make it easier for you to cast them in that light so you can feel better hating them, but that doesn't make your assessment accurate.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:32:55 AM EDT

Originally Posted By tc556guy:

Originally Posted By chuckhammer:

Originally Posted By tc556guy:
None of them are "evil". They hold a different political opinion, as people are free to do in this country. That doesn't make them "evil".




They are evil because they seek to do harm to other to the American people through their socialistic and tyrannical legislation.

In this case, different = EVIL.


They don't "seek to do harm". They have a different opinion on how to deal with a particular issue. Thats it. Congressional types are not "seeking to do harm". You make them out to be some sort of monster. It may make it easier for you to cast them in that light so you can feel better hating them, but that doesn't make your assessment accurate.



Simply because they don't view their legislative efforts as harmful doesn't make them any less so.

They are politically powerful monsters. That makes them more dangerous on a grand scale than any child molester, serial killer, or suicide bomber.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:01:59 AM EDT
Hands down it's "The Swimmer", from Boston!!
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:09:04 AM EDT
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:10:37 AM EDT

Originally Posted By tc556guy:
They don't "seek to do harm". They have a different opinion on how to deal with a particular issue. Thats it. Congressional types are not "seeking to do harm". You make them out to be some sort of monster. It may make it easier for you to cast them in that light so you can feel better hating them, but that doesn't make your assessment accurate.



With some, even most, politicians, your assesment is accurate.

However, some of these people are hardened communists and socialists. Those people ARE evil. They have no desire to allow a person a choice - they wish to make all the choices for everyone, and take away peoples freedoms, to benefit THEM.

And that is evil. And Chuck the Schmuck, Fineswine, Teddy, and Hitlery are all that way.

They don't think about you. They think about them. And they want power.

And a person who want's power is unfit to wield it.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:10:51 AM EDT
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:11:21 AM EDT

Originally Posted By LUGERMAN:
Hands down it's "The Swimmer", from Boston!!



You mean the hero of Chappaquiddick ?

Too bad fat lushes float so well.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:13:29 AM EDT
I think Hillary Clinton really is evil. Not just misguided, but someone who has absolutely sold her soul.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:34:58 AM EDT

Originally Posted By tc556guy:
None of them are "evil". They hold a different political opinion, as people are free to do in this country. That doesn't make them "evil".


Ever heard of 'sedition' or 'treason'? They are evil because they took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and everyday seek to undermine it.

But, you probably think the Constitution is a 'living' document.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 10:41:17 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/4/2005 10:42:03 AM EDT by Waldo0506]
I watched the debate on the Gun Industry Liability bill. Here are some rough quotes from Kennedy...

"if your the member of a terrorist organization you can buy guns here"

he says terrorist manuals talk about the "gun show loophole"

"...Barret advertises them to down airplanes..."

"reckless dealers sell millions of guns to terrorists and criminals"

"armor piercing ammo can be bought on ebay"

"you can purchase a grenade launcher at a gun show"

I laughed when he said that instead of debating this bill "we could be pretecting men and women in Iraq"

HAHAHA he supports troops now. lol


Kennedy doenst have a different opnion, he LIES!!
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:20:39 PM EDT

Originally Posted By AZ_Hoplite:

Originally Posted By tc556guy:
None of them are "evil". They hold a different political opinion, as people are free to do in this country. That doesn't make them "evil".


Ever heard of 'sedition' or 'treason'? They are evil because they took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and everyday seek to undermine it.

But, you probably think the Constitution is a 'living' document.


Actually, I do.
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:27:27 PM EDT
Kennedy- he has blood on his hands
Fienstein comes next, but she is just mis-guided
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:30:18 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 8:30:49 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/4/2005 9:07:48 PM EDT
Who is most Evil?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ 4 ] Mike DeWine [ 2.68% ]
[ 37 ] Feinstein [ 24.83% ]
[ 63 ] Kennedy [ 42.28% ]
[ 26 ] Schumer [ 17.45% ]
[ 26 ] TBK1


Ask MARY JO KOPECHNE
Top Top