Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 1/19/2006 9:50:17 PM EDT
This is a strange story carried by UPI, they say he tried to smuggle terrorists into the US, but that
there were no terrorists.........he just imagined them? And talked about them? Was scared of them?

I'm sure everything will be fine, we now return you to your regularly scheduled program

Drug gang plan to smuggle in Osama's guys
SHAUN WATERMAN
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor
www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060119-062911-6941r
WASHINGTON, Jan. 19 (UPI) -- A drug-trafficker who admitted importing a quarter-ton of cocaine from Mexico also plotted to smuggle 20 men he said were Iraqi terrorists into the United States, charging them $8000 a head.

In December 2004, Noel Exinia told associates in wiretapped and consensually recorded conversations that the men were "gente de Osama" -- Osama's guys -- and that they were "really bad people," who were armed and made the smugglers working with them afraid, according to papers filed last week by the U.S. Justice Department with the federal court in Brownsville, Texas.

In the papers, prosecutors say that Exinia was asked to move the men in by his boss in the notorious Gulf Cartel, a Mexican drug smuggling and organized crime network.

Investigators moved immediately at the suggestion of a terrorist nexus. "We jumped on that right away," a federal law enforcement official from one of the agencies involved told United Press International.

But the investigation "did not develop that way," the official said.

"The goods were not as advertised."

Nonetheless, the official said, "We were ready. That's the good news. If it had been the real deal, we had all the visibility we needed. We could have stopped it."

Exinia's plans never came to fruition. He was arrested the following month, and pleaded guilty late last year to drug importation charges.

According to the Brownsville Herald, which first reported the story, his defense lawyers had successfully fought to keep any reference to terrorism out of the trial.

Nonetheless, the case is the latest in a string that have highlighted the security risks posed by human trafficking and weak points in the country's immigration and border security.

A naturalized citizen faces charges in Michigan as the head of a ring that smuggled 200 mainly Iraqi illegal immigrants into the United States since 2001.

Iraqi-born Neeran Hakim Zaia was indicted in October 2004 along with her husband and three others following an undercover investigation spanning three continents that lasted more that three years and cost millions of dollars, U.S. officials familiar with the case told UPI last year.

And other federal officials tell UPI that Zaia is just one of a handful of so-called Tier One human trafficking targets in the sights of federal investigators and U.S. intelligence agencies concerned about their links to "special interest" countries -- those where global Islamic terrorists are thought to have a foothold.

The cases are stoking concern that human trafficking routes, including those across the porous southern border, are increasingly being used to smuggle special interest aliens into the United States.

The 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act gave legislative form to the U.S. Human Smuggling and Trafficking Center. It aims to co-ordinate the work of federal government agencies and their foreign and international partners against "the separate but related issues of alien smuggling, trafficking in persons, and smuggler support of clandestine terrorist travel," according to the State Department.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, part of the Department of Homeland Security currently holds the directorship of the center, which its web site describes as "an interagency joint intelligence fusion center," conjoining other parts of homeland security, the Departments of State and Justice and "members of the intelligence community."

Exinia will be sentenced in March, according to court records, and could face life in prison.

His lawyer said that there was no evidence of any real terrorist involvement. "They were terrorists only in his mind," John Blaylock told United Press International in a telephone interview from Harlingen, Texas.

Blaylock said his client had been asked about getting people over the border, but the idea that they were Iraqi terrorists "was an invention of Noel Exinia's."

He said the reference had none the less "got the attention" of federal authorities. "He got himself in a world of trouble."

Blaylock added prosecutors were introducing the terrorism conversations as "relevant conduct," to argue for a longer sentence even though "They know there were no real terrorists involved." He accused them of "piling on."

"It is unseemly," he said.

According to the pre-sentence review filing by federal prosecutors, the wiretapped and consensually recorded conversations about the "gente de Osama" took place largely with a pilot who had volunteered to help with his drug importation business and who later become a federal informant.

The pilot was husband to a "curandera," a traditional Mexican spiritualist, and met Exinia after the smuggler and his brother Carlos had asked for her help in silencing someone they believed to be an informant, and in blocking a police investigation after Carlos was arrested.

The curandera made "A doll with certain characteristics," that the brothers believed would "help in controlling" the informant and in "closing the mouth" of the policeman leading the investigation.
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:01:57 PM EDT
Was just thinking of the Zimmerman telegram. Would Mexico win or lose if the US suffered a drastic blow that forced us to become "just another country" in the world wide scheme of things. If something so bad happened that our society fractured and opened up the Southwest to them. Might they be tempted to help our enemies in subtle ways? Not trolling, just a thought...
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:06:45 PM EDT
An interesting thought, we are already seemingly ceding a portion of the country to them
What might the effect of a disaster or tragedy befalling us have on their ambitions?
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:16:09 PM EDT

Originally Posted By 22bad:
An interesting thought, we are already seemingly ceding a portion of the country to them
What might the effect of a disaster or tragedy befalling us have on their ambitions?



With the population ratios being what they are in the border states, especially more towards the border, it wouldn't take much. If our government had lost control so much that it was all they could do to keep the Union intact, then it would not even require much military presence at all.
Well, now that I say that, I imagine the fight they'd get from us Texans, with or without the .govs help. So it might not be that easy for them after all.
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:18:54 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Rakky:

Originally Posted By 22bad:
An interesting thought, we are already seemingly ceding a portion of the country to them
What might the effect of a disaster or tragedy befalling us have on their ambitions?



With the population ratios being what they are in the border states, especially more towards the border, it wouldn't take much. If our government had lost control so much that it was all they could do to keep the Union intact, then it would not even require much military presence at all.
Well, now that I say that, I imagine the fight they'd get from us Texans, with or without the .govs help. So it might not be that easy for them after all.



Watch your flank, many of the invaders are already your neighbors
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:22:32 PM EDT

Originally Posted By 22bad:

Originally Posted By Rakky:

Originally Posted By 22bad:
An interesting thought, we are already seemingly ceding a portion of the country to them
What might the effect of a disaster or tragedy befalling us have on their ambitions?



With the population ratios being what they are in the border states, especially more towards the border, it wouldn't take much. If our government had lost control so much that it was all they could do to keep the Union intact, then it would not even require much military presence at all.
Well, now that I say that, I imagine the fight they'd get from us Texans, with or without the .govs help. So it might not be that easy for them after all.



Watch your flank, many of the invaders are already your neighbors




Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:23:23 PM EDT
Mexico's largest industry is the money that is sent back from the US. They don't want our land, they want our money. Therefore our interests are somewhat intertwined.
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:24:38 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
Mexico's largest industry is the money that is sent back from the US. They don't want our land, they want our money. Therefore our interests are somewhat intertwined.



Cool, then there is nothing to worry about
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 10:25:44 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
Mexico's largest industry is the money that is sent back from the US. They don't want our land, they want our money. Therefore our interests are somewhat intertwined.



But if something happens so destructive to our economy, and nation as a whole, then what money would there to be to send back? At that point our resources become more valuable to them.
Top Top