Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 1/18/2006 5:06:32 AM EDT
Wouldn't you?

From the Abu Ghraib pics, wanting criminal trials for terrorists, now the phone surveillance. Al Queda has a vested interest in making sure that the ACLU is successful.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:13:59 AM EDT
ACLU was started by a socialist and still funded by the leftists.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:15:06 AM EDT
quite a possibility
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:15:19 AM EDT
Al Queda would prefer to blow up the ACLU and kill them all because they are Americans. But the ACLU doesn't understand that.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:16:20 AM EDT
They seem to be on the same side, dont they?
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:17:50 AM EDT
No, but George Soros is.

G
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:23:30 AM EDT


tin foil in place
popcorn at the ready
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:24:20 AM EDT
It's the other way around. The ACLU is funding Al Queda.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:24:48 AM EDT
Directly? No

Indirectly? Absolutely.......do you think they are stupid enough not to?
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:46:39 AM EDT
I think ACLU used to be funded by the Soviets, and now funded by the Communist China to undermind our society.

I will not be surprise if China secretly funding or funded Al Queda.

All three should be nuked from orbit.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 5:53:47 AM EDT
Sadly, that doesn't sound too far-fetched.

God,(Pun intended) i hate the aclu.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:04:17 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Danger_Close:
It's the other way around. The ACLU is funding Al Queda.



Actually....yes. They have been doing everything they can to help hurt us in the war on terror, including help defend people accused of funding terrorists.

However, I think it's more of a quid pro quo kind of thing. One hand washes the other.


-K
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:08:43 AM EDT
Monetarily in part. Philosophically 100%.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:09:02 AM EDT

Originally Posted By 4v50:
ACLU was started by a socialist and still funded by the leftists.

+1
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:11:24 AM EDT
ACLU? Hell, Al Queda is funding the news media in this country.....or at least so it seems by the slant the media seems to take.

Why don't they just come out and say "We hate the US, and we love the downtrodden peoples everywhere else, and its our goal to help the win, and destroy the US"

Fuckin' ACLU and the media...all traitors.....
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:20:01 AM EDT

Originally Posted By 4v50: ACLU was started by a socialist and still funded by the leftists.
Yep! www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19436

... Socialist Party member and ACLU founder Roger Baldwin was a devoted follower of anarchist Emma Goldman, who advocated “propaganda of the deed,” or what today is called terrorist bombing. Baldwin wrote in a 1917 letter to Louis Lochner of the socialist People’s Council in Minnesota about how to conceal their real intentions: “Do steer away from making it look like a Socialist enterprise . . . We want also to look like patriots in everything we do. We want to get a good lot of flags, talk a good deal about the Constitution and what our forefathers wanted to make of this country, and to show that we are really the folks that really stand for the spirit of our institutions.” ...
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:25:13 AM EDT
With the millions that we send to China buying their
2nd rate shit they should send money to the ACLU.
They can take over without firing a single shot.
Just like Mexico. Only an idiot would take us on militarily.
The USA can be easily taken with the pen and the law. Bastids!!!

Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:29:56 AM EDT
Between the ACLU, the unions and illegal immigration, we better stock up on some serious armament, because the war is at hand. Yes, I included the unions for a reason. Nothing but a bunch of extortionists....
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:37:26 AM EDT

Both are the enemy of the American culture.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 6:45:33 AM EDT

Loosen up the tinfoil.
ACLU is a bunch of socialists, yea.
Are they funded by Al qaeda?
That's about as likely as saying Cindy Sheehan gets money from Al Q
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 7:04:19 AM EDT
I think I remember reading that George Soros told AQ not to worry, that he'd fund the ACLU. He doesn't want AQ to "waste" money which could be better spent on operations.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 7:04:50 AM EDT

Originally Posted By glock23carry:
No, but George Soros is.

G


Damnit! Beat me to it!
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 7:05:45 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Special-K:

Originally Posted By Danger_Close:
It's the other way around. The ACLU is funding Al Queda.


Actually....yes. They have been doing everything they can to help hurt us in the war on terror, including help defend people accused of funding terrorists.

However, I think it's more of a quid pro quo kind of thing. One hand washes the other.

-K


Unless it's the left hand (or is it right? I can never remember).
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 7:52:20 PM EDT

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:

Loosen up the tinfoil.
ACLU is a bunch of socialists, yea.
Are they funded by Al qaeda?
That's about as likely as saying Cindy Sheehan gets money from Al Q



Tin Foil?

Sure the ACLU is a bunch of socialists… it was founded by Communist and Socialists. Has ALWAYS been a tool of Socialists.

We know they received funding from the Soviets.

They are working hand in hand with CAIR… CAIR = Terrorist sympathizer/funder/collaborator. The ACLU is therefore de facto working hand in hand with terrorist.

To say it is possible the ACLU receives funding from an American enemy is only logical.

Cindy Sheehan gets money from ANSWER… a Communist America hating organization so what is the difference.
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 7:59:58 PM EDT

Originally Posted By leungken:
I think ACLU used to be funded by the Soviets, and now funded by the Communist China to undermind our society.

I will not be surprise if China secretly funding or funded Al Queda.

All three should be nuked from orbit.



i believe it but do you have links to anything stating that
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 8:03:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/18/2006 8:04:37 PM EDT by DK-Prof]

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:


Loosen up the tinfoil.




+1



Who do you think gets more money (indirectly, of course) from the Saudis? Democrats or Republicans?

OMG - maybe fundamentalist Islamists are funding the Republican party!!

Link Posted: 1/18/2006 8:05:59 PM EDT

Originally Posted By DK-Prof:

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:


Loosen up the tinfoil.




+1



Who do you think gets more money (indirectly, of course) from the Saudis? Democrats or Republicans?

OMG - maybe fundamentalist Islamists are funding the Republican party!!




+1
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 8:07:58 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:

Loosen up the tinfoil.
ACLU is a bunch of socialists, yea.
Are they funded by Al qaeda?
That's about as likely as saying Cindy Sheehan gets money from Al Q



Tin Foil?

Sure the ACLU is a bunch of socialists… it was founded by Communist and Socialists. Has ALWAYS been a tool of Socialists.

We know they received funding from the Soviets.



so?



They are working hand in hand with CAIR… CAIR = Terrorist sympathizer/funder/collaborator. The ACLU is therefore de facto working hand in hand with terrorist.



wierd, I seem to remember CAIR always being against terrorism(they were the first Muslim group to come out against al-qaida), care to enlighten me?
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 9:09:30 PM EDT

Originally Posted By KlubMarcus:

Originally Posted By 4v50: ACLU was started by a socialist and still funded by the leftists.
Yep! www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19436

... Socialist Party member and ACLU founder Roger Baldwin was a devoted follower of anarchist Emma Goldman, who advocated “propaganda of the deed,” or what today is called terrorist bombing. Baldwin wrote in a 1917 letter to Louis Lochner of the socialist People’s Council in Minnesota about how to conceal their real intentions: “Do steer away from making it look like a Socialist enterprise . . . We want also to look like patriots in everything we do. We want to get a good lot of flags, talk a good deal about the Constitution and what our forefathers wanted to make of this country, and to show that we are really the folks that really stand for the spirit of our institutions.” ...



Yep. A little more Revolutionary Parlimentarianism. Or, as I like to call them, "Communist bastards".
Link Posted: 1/18/2006 9:22:10 PM EDT
I guess in 1977 they were funded by the Nazis.
Link Posted: 1/19/2006 5:46:06 AM EDT

Originally Posted By DK-Prof:

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:


Loosen up the tinfoil.


+1

Who do you think gets more money (indirectly, of course) from the Saudis? Democrats or Republicans?

OMG - maybe fundamentalist Islamists are funding the Republican party!!


Of course Saudis are (to some degree). But I don't know I'd go as far as calling those Saudis "fundamentalist Islamists"......... what do you call anyone else who protects their own economic interests by throwing money around? I call them "lobbyists".

That said, Saudis != AQ.


(at least not the Saudis who are contributing to the Republican Party or to Repub candidates)
Top Top