Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 1/21/2013 6:35:48 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 6:45:12 AM EDT
[#1]
wow....DHS is on our side?
in before obummer tells pistole to stick to grabbin grannie's crotch......


and hit, on the poll...
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 6:47:00 AM EDT
[#2]
Lol. The Ministry of Truth  should redact that document.

Edit for 1984 correction.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 6:49:42 AM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
wow....DHS is on our side?
in before obummer tells pistole to stick to grabbin grannie's crotch......


and hit, on the poll...


Don't hold your breathe.  This is just another glaring example of Gov't inefficiency; ie, the Left hand knows not what the Right is doing.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 6:51:59 AM EDT
[#4]
I personally believe that " assault rifles" are paramount to homeland security.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 6:57:45 AM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 6:58:18 AM EDT
[#6]
DHS don't really want a war with all us fuckers.
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 7:00:21 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:
wow....DHS is on our side?
in before obummer tells pistole to stick to grabbin grannie's crotch......



No, not really - it's a RFP for a contract to supply PDWs to the DHS, for the use of their ICE officers.

So it's not like DHS is saying that such rifles are appropriate for mere lowly peasants like us - they are saying that select-fire rifles in 5.56NATO w. 30-round magazines are appropriate for self-defense weapons for their ICE officers.

Not quite the same, and even if the hypocrisy is pointed out, the gov't response will just be the same logic as "military and police need these weapons, not you"


well, that makes more sense
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 7:01:20 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 7:02:31 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Quoted:
wow....DHS is on our side?
in before obummer tells pistole to stick to grabbin grannie's crotch......



No, not really - it's a RFP for a contract to supply PDWs to the DHS, for the use of their ICE officers.

So it's not like DHS is saying that such rifles are appropriate for mere lowly peasants like us - they are saying that select-fire rifles in 5.56NATO w. 30-round magazines are appropriate for self-defense weapons for their ICE officers.

Not quite the same, and even if the hypocrisy is pointed out, the gov't response will just be the same logic as "military and police need these weapons, not you"



Exactly this.  Some people (feds) are more equal than others (peasants).
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 7:03:31 AM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 1/21/2013 7:09:32 AM EDT
[#11]


No, no, no, you have to read closer.



"DHS and its components have a requirement for a 5.56x45mm NATO, select-fire firearm suitable for personal defense use in close quarters"



I believe the correct interpretation is we should be allowed to own M4s for personal defense, if not AR-15s.  

Link Posted: 1/21/2013 7:24:05 AM EDT
[#12]
Awesome stuff to throw in the face of antis whenever they make their "nobody needs an AR15" argument.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top