Now I'm a little confused here. The doc says that the alergy didn't kill her, that lack of oxygen did. But isn't that exactly what the end result of a severe alergic reaction would be?
Unless of course the doc found that she had an obstructed airway, CO poisoning, or that she had drowned wouldn't cranial apoxia be expected?
Uhhh, it says that the doc thinks she died from an athsma attack.
This is more BS from the anti peanut assclowns.
I have food allergies. I'm allergic to fish.
If chicken or fries are cooked in the same oil. It won't kill me.
If I'm in the same room as fish being cooked. It won't kill me.
In fact. I still go fishing.
If fresh fish goes thru a canning process, I can eat it.
If I eat it fresh or get the fish juices in my eyes. I'm in trouble. Throat swells. Gets hard to breath. Also temporarily blind.
I know my limits and take precautions to protect myself. I don't need some freeken nanny government to tell me or other people they cant eat or have fish near me.
I honestly believe that people are blowing all of this out of proportion. This BS is to allow people to file law suits against the fast food industry to please the PETA clowns that don't want you to eat meat.
That and it makes the lawyers rich.