Quoted:
Quoted: The Nikkor 80-200ED is a classic, very very good lens (which I think has been superceded by a 70-200)
Third party lenses can be very good, but I would be quite surprised to see one equal, let alone surpass the top of the line Nikkors.
btw, that 80-200 outperforms all but a few fixed focal length lenses, being nearly as good as my 180 f2.8 Nikkor. Both 85's (1.8 & 1.4 are also very good)
See what Nikonians (the forum link I posted awhile back) has to say about the lens (I would search but am past bedtime)
Which lenses do you already have?
|
Just the 18-70mm 3.5-4.5 kit lens
I'd love a nice 100mm or so macro lens as well, if only I was made of money
|
Hey, nothing wrong with that lens, big expensive glass by itself is no guarantee of great pictures (FWIW, I still have the cameras I started with many moons ago, and some of the images are surprisingly good)
Spend some time on technique before breaking the piggybank on big lenses. The first two lenses I bought for my Nikons were a 24mm f2.8 & the 85mm f1.8 (each around $300, and Nikon usually has rebates) and they are still the two I use most often (the 17/180/400/800 etc. come out far less frequently)
Hand holding a big, heavy zoom lens is a challenge, you may want to opt for one of the VR lenses, if not using a good tripod. Add teleconverters later, good ones cost $$$ and make the need for stability even greater.
As much of a resource as ARFcom is, I would really recommend bouncing this off the guys at Nikonians, they know the cameras & lenses like this place knows black rifles.
what am I saying? Use both!