. but you place the blame on the science instead of the media, congress, john q. public, and others who aren't well-versed in the science behind these things and therefore necessarily make faulty judgements. you can't blame science becaues some other party misuses the data.
View Quote
No but I do place blame on scientists who would go before the house and senate and argue for legislation sponsored by say the EPA when they themselves know that their data is incomplete and most likely erroneous. That is unethical, and morally wrong. Not to mention that it has a eventual negative impact on peoples perception of scientist, and in the long run an impact on their own funding.
That not only hurts business and citizens alike, it eventually hurts the scientist themselves.
I love science to my very core, I can truly appreciate a man/women who is capable of clear concise and correct insights into the nature of our universe. And for that reason I expect all scientist to aspire to the utmost of their ability to be RIGHT and CONCLUSIVE.
I blame the media, for not publishing stories with intellectual rigor.
I blame the congress for not having a good enough grasp of science to begin with. This is the same group of guys who tried to legislate that pi be rounded off to merely 3.0,
As for John Q. Public: Well , the problem was 10-30 years ago when they were in school.
They will learn what we teach them. DUMBUS DOWN DUMBUS DOWN !!! The universal chant of the public school meisters clear across these Great States.
A few can still think when they get out. Thank God, because that will have to make the difference.