Quoted: I actually do the exercises that you mention, three times a week with 20# weights. Have been doing that for 2 years now. So that should be no problem.
My budget right now is only $300-500 max. I know that's low, but I have no doubt that I can find an adequate bow for that. I can spend the big bucks later (once I decide that I want to stick with it). I believe in buying the best one can afford, but I cannot afford more than that right now. Will check this thread later at home for more advice. Thanks guys!
|
That's actually really good you do those exercises, I congratulate you. ALOT of people ignore their shoulders and they get beat on during other compound lifting exercises. (shoulders NEED muscle to properly support the joint, just like a Knee. It is the second most complex major joint that's prone to injury in the human body)
Your budget is quite wide, and bridges the two usual barriers; those that won't spend over $300, and those that spend from $400-$650.
If you're not adverse to used gear, you could make out like a bandit with the 'great' stuff right off the bat, and enjoy the shooting much better.
I'll sidestep for a second, and say that I'm a Mathews Biggot. I have shot as you can imagine many brands of bows, from mainstream companies, to small start up's as they are were making their root in the industry (Riptide was probably the most memorable of those).
Most compound designs are all made well in today's industry; there is more similarity than difference between most models. As I said, key points are a single cam, avoid split limbs if you can, or any radical riser design.
Single cams help reduce timing issues as another had mentioned earlier. It's not a HUGE deal normally though; in truth, as timing shifts, most shooters adjust with it as it goes until it's wicked out of hand. (at which point it's obvious they are way out of time)
Split Limbs came about around the late 90's. It was heralded as this revolutionary way to help with limb vibration. The problem (and truth) revealed was that (and this has been known in competitive circles for a long time) getting a matched set of limbs, upper and lower, in a PLAIN two limb bow, was hard enough. Variances in the way fiberglass cures, even in today age, the materials used as the core, wood, carbon, or carbon laminate, never produce two totally identical reacting limbs. And now, with split limb bow designs, you're going to ask for FOUR limbs? The purported 'recoil reduction' isn't realized, and to point, there are better ways to manage said recoil, from cam design, to riser design.
Riser design is something that you MUST pay attention to. It's like the fit of a handgun. It HAS to fit you. But, it must ALSO be designed with your shooting ability/intent in mind. For a crash course, this is the nuts and bolts. A riser (the handle that connects the limbs, and is where the arrow launches from) can be reflex, deflex, or neutral. This refers to the bend in the handle. Drawing a line vertically down the limb bolts from the side, if the crotch of the hand grip is forward of this line, it is a deflex riser. If the handle sits behind that line, it's known as reflex. Most 'speed' bows have a DEEP DEEP reflex. This places the pivot point the bow at launch WAY behind the limb bolts, so leverage says every improperly formed shot flaw will be magnified. (it should be evident now why bow design is critical, and chasing speed without proper foundation skill can lead to extreme frustration)
As mentioned earlier, once you have the bow, it has to be sized to you. Most good dealers can adjust the modular portion of the cam to get it into your draw length. Once again, try your best to stay away from large retailers; they just will not have the real expertise to get you 'fitted' properly to the bow. They closest they can come is finding/ordering a bow off the shelf, cutting arrows to your draw length, and telling you to 'have at it'.
Once properly sized, arrow choice is next up. Carbons have come the defacto standard, pushing aluminum out of the picture. There are a myriad of company's and choices, and I really can't say anyone is 'better' than another for most shooters. The only thing you should avoid are 'outsert' based arrows. This is where the screw in adapters are glued to the outside diameter of the shaft. You WANT inserts. They are easier to manage, easier to draw from your target, and more common nowadays. (replacement parts wise)
This has gotten retardedly long, so I'll shut up now.
Oh, and a major advisement; Get and read this book:
Kirk's BookIt speaks from a competition standpoint, but form is fundamental, and applies to a hunter just the same.
E.