User Panel
<sigh>
<---- ETA: looks kinda like an AK's attempt to imitate a Sig 55x series. I like. |
|
Even given that I really can't stand the official Third World Rabble issue rifle, that is one nice looking piece. Makes me rethink the whole AK thing. Might have to get one now.
|
|
FAL parts (on second glance it looks like a R4 folder...)
HK parts AR parts... Oh Shit...! |
|
I was goig to say that, I've owned really nice tight fitting aks, you can't get it that tight to put a sight there is stupid |
|
|
The rail for mounting optics is not on the dust cover. Only the open HK rear sight is on the dust cover, which is no big deal. I like it. Definitely an improvement over past variations I've seen. |
|
|
does it finally have a bolt-hold open device for when the magazine gets empty? If not, I'll pass.
|
|
The HK rear sight stinks compared to the AR sight. Putting it on the rear dustcover is silly anyway, as that part is loose on even the best AKs. That is why Kalashinkov put the sight up on the gas block.
|
|
Blasphamy! Aks are SUPPOSED to be ugly! I love my Romanian AK with wooden furniture! I would never dress it up all pretty-like with plastic.
|
|
The sight base isn't mounted on the dust cover. It's mounted forward of the cover where the rear sight normally is located on a standard AK. Since this model uses an HK type rear sight, that freed up this area for the optics base. That area is much more sturdy and stable than the dust cover.
BTW, that's a really nice rifle. So long as it doesn't cost $1000 or $1200, I'd be greatly interested. |
|
Polished turd.
I love my AKs, but I also see them for what they are. Cheaply made rifles, designed to be utterly reliable, while sacraficing accuracy, fit, and finish. That one does look really cool, but I doubt it will ever match a decent, basic AR for accuracy, and considering that good maintenance will keep an AR running well, I doubt this is much more than a high priced toy for people who want something cool looking and different. Like me. |
|
The optical base is mounted on the gas block. The iron sight is mounted on the cover. There is a reason that Kalashnikov didn't put the iron sights back there. |
|
|
I disagree entirely. I own a VEPR-II. It is made well, has good fit and finish, and is an extremely accurate rifle. And it cost a little more than half what my Bushmaster cost. The AK is an excellent rifle when done properly. It is just not as ergonomic or versatile when it comes to mounting stuff on it as the AR platform. |
|
|
I think AKs look better muddy and all banged up. But that's just me.
|
|
That AK is as ghey as they come.
Why do idiots believe that adding parts from many different rifles to theirs somehow makes it cool? |
|
Heres the link over to Lightfighter where the pic and others were first posted
lightfighter.net/groupee/forums/a/tpc/f/7206084761/m/7571049751 |
|
Fugly.
I don't know who first said it, but don't Tapcoize your AK. |
|
TAPCOIZE! Holy shit that's funny. |
|
|
To each his own. I like my AK's to be AK's. I don't feel the need to add to them. I like them for what they are. Do what ya want. |
|
Yeah, man. Puttin' more functional / ergonomically efficient parts and accurizing fifty year old technology is crazy, just crazy. Suddenly, I may be in the AK market. Where can I get one?? |
|
|
48thHighlander (the guy who made it) discussed this at Lightfighter...
|
|||
|
Ever since J.M. Browning died, this pretty much has been SOP on designing new firearms... |
|
|
Yeah - I mean, we'd be much better off with the very first, original AR design than the one we have now. Innovation - bad. Never progressing - good. |
||
|
It is kinda funny how these "20 Minute Purists" pick and choose at what point development/progression stops and anything they don't like or agree with is heresy. |
|||
|
+1 |
||
|
|
The FalArAK HaugKSig91 I want one!!!!! |
||
|
I like it. Something like that might interest me in getting an AK. I wonder about making the gas block (?) with a short section of picatinny rail instead of the rear sight attachment... would make a nice mounting point for an aimpoint on a low ring. Don't forget a galil-esque thumb safety
And how about a simple rear sight with a flip aperture like an A1 or FAL para rear sight? ETA: don't care for the trick mag release, seems counter-intuitive and easily snagged. |
|
IM SOLD!
Has anyone successfult put an ACOG or EOTec on an AK before? |
|
But I dont thing any of you have noticed that us common people will ever be able to get our hands on one...
Short barrel..... Check Fun switch.... Check Evil 3rd hole with pin.... Check They could cost $49.99 and you still would not be able to get it (unless your a SOT dealer). |
|
Looks like Stevie Wonder welded that site onto the receiver cover
|
|
It should also be noted that this rifle was put together with parts they had laying around the shop...
|
|
www.grenadierprecision.com+ Both of the owners/deisgners are members here: 48thHighlander (Darren) MisterJG (Jesse) |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.