User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:12:01 PM EDT
I know, fuck canned chili but I dont have time for that.
I want to stock up for camping (and SHTF mkay?) Curious what the votes would be from the bunch here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:13:12 PM EDT
[#1]
In for the beatdown....
Wolf's, what else? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:13:31 PM EDT
[#2]
Wolf mixed with crackers, cheese, hot sauce and sour creme is almost paletable.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:13:34 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
canned chili 
I don't understand. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:13:47 PM EDT
[#4]
I've always enjoyed Stag.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:14:04 PM EDT
[#5]
I like the chunky brand, no beans of course
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:14:21 PM EDT
[#6]
For preps, make sure that you have TP.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:14:57 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
I've always enjoyed Stag. I liked it too, you can't find it around here anymore. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:17:26 PM EDT
[#8]
Steak and Shake. It has beans but it's still great.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:17:40 PM EDT
[#9]
The one with beans.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:18:16 PM EDT
[#10]
wolf hot with no beans.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:19:16 PM EDT
[#11]
The one made in New York City.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:22:48 PM EDT
[#12]
Campbell's Firehouse or Roadhouse Chili in a pinch...
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:23:49 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
canned chili 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:25:36 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted: This stuff is pretty good, I am normally repulsed by Campbell's soups (except tomato (with milk)). Impressed.Campbell's Firehouse or Roadhouse Chili in a pinch... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:26:13 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
wolf hot with no beans. I'll agree with that
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:27:13 PM EDT
[#16]
Hormel or wolf, I prefer the lean and or spicy variety. Hormel makes an awesome chicken chili too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:27:46 PM EDT
[#17]
Hormel chilli w no beans
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:28:47 PM EDT
[#18]
I have heard that this is considered the finest chili in Texas:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:29:36 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
Steak and Shake. It has beans but it's still is great and as a bonus it has beans. FIFY |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:29:42 PM EDT
[#20]
Quoted:
Quoted:
canned chili http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/5/26/128878480058120679.jpg I can haz faggotry? DO NOT WANT!!! Faggotry not relevant to my interests.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:31:14 PM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
I have heard that this is considered the finest chili in Texas: http://healthyheartmarket.com/images/products/display/24102-web.jpg You are very BRAVE Come to TEXAS and I will buy you some of that and some Lone Star beer 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:32:38 PM EDT
[#22]
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:35:19 PM EDT
[#23]
Vietti or GTFO... made in Nashville, TN
...wash 'er down with Sun-Drop. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:36:00 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted: Another vote. My pantry has a few cans of that for emergencies. Add Sriracha for additional heat and flavor. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:36:10 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
Quoted:
canned chili http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/5/26/128878480058120679.jpg I second this emotion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:40:44 PM EDT
[#26]
If chili was supposed to not have beans in it, they wouldn't have to mark it "No Beans" They don't mark Coke as Coke + Sugar, they just mark Diet Coke "Diet" |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:41:15 PM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
canned chili http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/5/26/128878480058120679.jpg I second this emotion. I hope you guys are around if I ever need a dildo recommendation. 
Just funnin' ya |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:42:04 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
If chili was supposed to not have beans in it, they wouldn't have to mark it "No Beans" They don't mark Coke as Coke + Sugar, they just mark Diet Coke "Diet" I like this logic 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:44:09 PM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
canned chili http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/5/26/128878480058120679.jpg I second this emotion. I hope you guys are around if I ever need a dildo recommendation.
Just funnin' ya I have been told that this is the biggest dildo in Texas |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:44:53 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
canned chili http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/5/26/128878480058120679.jpg I second this emotion. I hope you guys are around if I ever need a dildo recommendation.
Just funnin' ya I have been told that this is the biggest dildo in Texas 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:46:19 PM EDT
[#31]
Quoted:
wolf hot with no beans. Yes sir!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:49:12 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: canned chili http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/5/26/128878480058120679.jpg I second this emotion. I hope you guys are around if I ever need a dildo recommendation. Just funnin' ya I have been told that this is the biggest dildo in Texas Quien es? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:52:37 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
Quien es? TX Rep Sheila Jackson Lee, perhaps prodding MA Rep Bawney Fwank with aforementioned prosthetic peni |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:53:15 PM EDT
[#34]
Just remember: You don't BUY canned chili. You only RENT it...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 4:57:21 PM EDT
[#35]
I used to love Wolf back in the 70's, but it's changed since then.
Nowadays Hormel with beans over white rice is my chili of choice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:00:15 PM EDT
[#36]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:00:19 PM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:
Campbell's Firehouse or Roadhouse Chili in a pinch...
Yep! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:07:31 PM EDT
[#38]
I use a can of the Hormel chili with a local store brand along with a can of diced tomatos and some sliced peppers and onions, then pour in a whole mess of hot sauce. I let that cook on top of my woodstove in the winter. MMMMMM MMMMMMMM dat sho' am good!!!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:08:56 PM EDT
[#39]
tony packos ,the only chilli in a can
http://www.soupsonline.com/p-1313-world-famous-chili-with-beans.aspx try to find it local ,ive seen it at meijers |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:15:49 PM EDT
[#40]
Quoted: Quoted: If chili was supposed to not have beans in it, they wouldn't have to mark it "No Beans" They don't mark Coke as Coke + Sugar, they just mark Diet Coke "Diet" I like this logic Sure it makes sense - if you completely ignore the history of chili, where it came from, and apply a heaping mound of fail to your thinking. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:19:49 PM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If chili was supposed to not have beans in it, they wouldn't have to mark it "No Beans" They don't mark Coke as Coke + Sugar, they just mark Diet Coke "Diet" I like this logic Sure it makes sense - if you completely ignore the history of chili, where it came from, and apply a heaping mound of fail to your thinking. Only problem is that the same chili with beans is marked "with beans". therefore it's wolf's labeling system and not official nomenclature. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:23:32 PM EDT
[#42]
This is my go to if I am in a hurry and can't make my own.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:27:17 PM EDT
[#43]
Quoted: Only problem is that the same chili with beans is marked "with beans". therefore it's wolf's labeling system and not official nomenclature. I blame Yankees corrupting chili nomenclature. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:28:06 PM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If chili was supposed to not have beans in it, they wouldn't have to mark it "No Beans" They don't mark Coke as Coke + Sugar, they just mark Diet Coke "Diet" I like this logic Sure it makes sense - if you completely ignore the history of chili, where it came from, and apply a heaping mound of fail to your thinking. Is this the accepted beginning? 1860 - Residents of the Texas prisons in the mid to late 1800s also lay claim to the creation of chili. They say that the Texas version of bread and water (or gruel) was a stew of the cheapest available ingredients (tough beef that was hacked fine and chilies and spices that was boiled in water to an edible consistency). The "prisoner's plight" became a status symbol of the Texas prisons and the inmates used to rate jails on the quality of their chili. The Texas prison system made such good chili that freed inmates often wrote for the recipe, saying what they missed most after leaving was a really good bowl of chili. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:44:16 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted: Is this the accepted beginning? 1860 - Residents of the Texas prisons in the mid to late 1800s also lay claim to the creation of chili. They say that the Texas version of bread and water (or gruel) was a stew of the cheapest available ingredients (tough beef that was hacked fine and chilies and spices that was boiled in water to an edible consistency). The "prisoner's plight" became a status symbol of the Texas prisons and the inmates used to rate jails on the quality of their chili. The Texas prison system made such good chili that freed inmates often wrote for the recipe, saying what they missed most after leaving was a really good bowl of chili. There's also the account of cowboys eating it while traveling (aka "chili bricks"). Obviously there are many dishes throughout the world that are cooked with chilies and spices, but those aren't what we're talking about. The version of chili we're used to morphed out the 1850s and 1860s into what the Chili Queens in San Antonio served, and all those were without any fillers. Beans were served on the side, but never in the chili. I'm not denying that a lot of people like beans in their chili, and chili WITH beans is probably more popular, but it doesn't change the fact that chili is cooked without beans. While I like to argue the finer points, I have no problems with someone wanting to add beans to their chili as long as they call it chili WITH beans and don't insist that chili = chili + beans as the origins of chili obviously show that to be false. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:48:56 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this the accepted beginning? 1860 - Residents of the Texas prisons in the mid to late 1800s also lay claim to the creation of chili. They say that the Texas version of bread and water (or gruel) was a stew of the cheapest available ingredients (tough beef that was hacked fine and chilies and spices that was boiled in water to an edible consistency). The "prisoner's plight" became a status symbol of the Texas prisons and the inmates used to rate jails on the quality of their chili. The Texas prison system made such good chili that freed inmates often wrote for the recipe, saying what they missed most after leaving was a really good bowl of chili. There's also the account of cowboys eating it while traveling (aka "chili bricks"). Obviously there are many dishes throughout the world that are cooked with chilies and spices, but those aren't what we're talking about. The version of chili we're used to morphed out the 1850s and 1860s into what the Chili Queens in San Antonio served, and all those were without any fillers. Beans were served on the side, but never in the chili. I'm not denying that a lot of people like beans in their chili, and chili WITH beans is probably more popular, but it doesn't change the fact that chili is cooked without beans. While I like to argue the finer points, I have no problems with someone wanting to add beans to their chili as long as they call it chili WITH beans and don't insist that chili = chili + beans as the origins of chili obviously show that to be false.
From now on I'll abnegate my argument. Previously everyone is always arguing yea or nae on beans, not explaining the origins of chili. Well played sir. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:52:09 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this the accepted beginning? 1860 - Residents of the Texas prisons in the mid to late 1800s also lay claim to the creation of chili. They say that the Texas version of bread and water (or gruel) was a stew of the cheapest available ingredients (tough beef that was hacked fine and chilies and spices that was boiled in water to an edible consistency). The "prisoner's plight" became a status symbol of the Texas prisons and the inmates used to rate jails on the quality of their chili. The Texas prison system made such good chili that freed inmates often wrote for the recipe, saying what they missed most after leaving was a really good bowl of chili. There's also the account of cowboys eating it while traveling (aka "chili bricks"). Obviously there are many dishes throughout the world that are cooked with chilies and spices, but those aren't what we're talking about. The version of chili we're used to morphed out the 1850s and 1860s into what the Chili Queens in San Antonio served, and all those were without any fillers. Beans were served on the side, but never in the chili. I'm not denying that a lot of people like beans in their chili, and chili WITH beans is probably more popular, but it doesn't change the fact that chili is cooked without beans. While I like to argue the finer points, I have no problems with someone wanting to add beans to their chili as long as they call it chili WITH beans and don't insist that chili = chili + beans as the origins of chili obviously show that to be false.
From now on I'll abnegate my argument. Previously everyone is always arguing yea or nae on beans, not explaining the origins of chili. Well played sir. I thought everyone knew that "authentic chili" had no beans. It is Americana just like most Mexican and Italian food is in the states. Some would argue an abomination, but if it tastes good, fockin eat it!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:53:20 PM EDT
[#48]
This but with beans of course.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:53:35 PM EDT
[#49]
Texas Ruby's
NO Beans |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2011 5:58:19 PM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this the accepted beginning? 1860 - Residents of the Texas prisons in the mid to late 1800s also lay claim to the creation of chili. They say that the Texas version of bread and water (or gruel) was a stew of the cheapest available ingredients (tough beef that was hacked fine and chilies and spices that was boiled in water to an edible consistency). The "prisoner's plight" became a status symbol of the Texas prisons and the inmates used to rate jails on the quality of their chili. The Texas prison system made such good chili that freed inmates often wrote for the recipe, saying what they missed most after leaving was a really good bowl of chili. There's also the account of cowboys eating it while traveling (aka "chili bricks"). Obviously there are many dishes throughout the world that are cooked with chilies and spices, but those aren't what we're talking about. The version of chili we're used to morphed out the 1850s and 1860s into what the Chili Queens in San Antonio served, and all those were without any fillers. Beans were served on the side, but never in the chili. I'm not denying that a lot of people like beans in their chili, and chili WITH beans is probably more popular, but it doesn't change the fact that chili is cooked without beans. While I like to argue the finer points, I have no problems with someone wanting to add beans to their chili as long as they call it chili WITH beans and don't insist that chili = chili + beans as the origins of chili obviously show that to be false.
From now on I'll abnegate my argument. Previously everyone is always arguing yea or nae on beans, not explaining the origins of chili. Well played sir. 
ok ok, i may try this no beans thing, any of you texans have a good recipe they would like to share? |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
