Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/28/2005 9:21:16 AM EDT
I got this question and I'm stumped on what its even asking...Please explain.


Under Terry v. Ohio, identify the Constitutional issues supporting an investigatory stop.


Thanks
Link Posted: 8/28/2005 9:27:05 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/28/2005 9:27:35 AM EDT by Dru]
Whew.......... That exceeds even my intellectual abilities..............
Link Posted: 8/28/2005 9:27:56 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/28/2005 9:30:38 AM EDT by ZW17]
Illegal search and seizure?

A "investigatory stop" could be taken as a illegal search. Fishing for info. looking for warrants with no real reason to stop the person/people.

That is my take anyway.

4th:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Link Posted: 8/28/2005 9:30:16 AM EDT

Originally Posted By ZW17:
Illegal search and seizure?

A "investigatory stop" could be taken as a illegal search. Fishing for info. looking for warrants with no real reason to stop the person/people.

That is my take anyway.



no, they want the issues that "support" the illegal stop....therefore you must read into the "living document" and distort the original meaning and intent of the Constitution....
Link Posted: 8/28/2005 9:30:58 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Dru:
Whew.......... That exceeds even my intellectual abilities..............



yes, you must not have a "logical mind" but one with "emotion and feeling"....
Link Posted: 8/28/2005 9:32:39 AM EDT

Originally Posted By mikejohnson:

Originally Posted By ZW17:
Illegal search and seizure?

A "investigatory stop" could be taken as a illegal search. Fishing for info. looking for warrants with no real reason to stop the person/people.

That is my take anyway.



no, they want the issues that "support" the illegal stop....therefore you must read into the "living document" and distort the original meaning and intent of the Constitution....




Oh damn, I just reread your 1st post. That is messed up.
Link Posted: 8/28/2005 9:36:24 AM EDT
Top Top