User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 7:01:37 PM EDT
[#1]
i dont think they make it anymore, but if you scour auction sites you may find one
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 8:02:20 PM EDT
[#2]
Pre-ban as in "it has a folding pistol-grip stock already installed, that was installed prior to 9/13/94?" There were no factory pre-ban Camp 45's.
-Troy |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 8:30:12 PM EDT
[#3]
No disrespect, Mr Troy but... 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 8:35:39 PM EDT
[#4]
Yeah, I was being an ass, but I was doing so because too many folks think "pre-ban" means "any gun manufactured before 9/13/94", without understanding that if it wasn't an AW back then, it can't be one now. I just don't want anyone to *unknowingly* get busted, as it's bad for everyone. I personally don't care how anyone configures their rifle as long as they are safe with it.
No one will be happier than me when this all goes away in 10 months. -Troy |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 8:39:26 PM EDT
[#5]
Choate Machine and Tool used to have them (wish I had bought one when I had the chance), but I don't see them anymore.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 8:46:20 PM EDT
[#6]
Here, found this... www.gunsamerica.com/guns/976395018.htm
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/16/2003 8:59:16 PM EDT
[#7]
I had both the chote and the ramline folders on my camp 9 in my youth. I now use the wood stock again not that I ever use that gun.
The ramline stocks are crap I broke it in 2. The chote is a good unit but it was pricy even back when they where still made. Stay far far far away from the bullpump conversions. NoKarma |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/17/2003 12:47:50 AM EDT
[#8]
Troy, I should have been clearer, you're right, and good point (Man, I can't wait until this stupid law goes away). It had a Ramline folder on it that didn't (fold that is).
I was hoping someone had another alternative to the Choate one, the auction sights want an arm and a leg for those. Are there any synthetic stocks for it with pistol grip, but no fold? Well, besides those bull-pup things, don't want one of those. Thanks! Michael |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/17/2003 12:49:47 AM EDT
[#9]
NoKarma, why don't you use the Camp 9 anymore? I like my 45 version, and although I'm not a big 9 fan, I'd kind of like one for the cheap ammo.
How does it stack up to either of the Kel-tec versions? Michael |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2003 7:19:59 AM EDT
[#10]
It did not feed hollow point well and i wont trust my ass to 9mm ball. It is a neat little gun but good hicap mags over 20 rounds where always hard to find for it. The action cycled fairly slowly and did not take well to useing hot rounds. I think what i wanted out of the gun was a HK 94 for $300 and we both know you get what you pay for....
NoKarma |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
