what a f***ing joke this law is...

-------------------------------------------

Apr 19, 2007 4:29 pm US/Pacific

Police Sergeant Pleads Guilty To Possessing Rifle
SLIDESHOWS: View The Day's Top Photos
VIDEO: Watch The Latest News
(CBS) LOS ANGELES A Culver City police sergeant has pleaded guilty to illegally possessing a semi-automatic rifle found while police investigated his wife’s 1992 slaying.

Harvey Bailey was sentenced to two years summary probation and ordered to serve 300 hours of community service after pleading to a misdemeanor charge, said Joel Isaacson, his attorney. He was initially charged with two felony counts of illegal possession of assault weapons, stemming from the recovery of the firearms during a March 31, 2006 search of Bailey’s 99th Street home, which he was renting to his in-laws.

Isaacson said he did not know what effect his client's plea would have on his position in the Culver City Police Department, where Bailey has worked for more than 28 years. The department does not comment on personnel matters, said Sgt. Randy Vickrey.

On Christmas Eve 1992, Bailey returned home from his office to find his wife strangled and bludgeoned to death in the bedroom of their South Los Angeles bungalow. Bailey, a two-time officer of the year, became the main suspect in the slaying a short time later. Los Angeles Police Department homicide detectives repeatedly questioned him, and prosecutors convened a grand jury to examine the case.

In the end, he was never charged in his wife's death. Bailey remarried and was promoted to lieutenant.

But years later, the LAPD again began examining the slaying of Jan Bailey, and the focus was again on the police veteran, according to the Los Angeles Times. LAPD detectives served search warrants at Bailey's two homes and his locker at Culver City police headquarters. Bailey was charged as a result of those searches.

Isaacson said Bailey purchased the firearms when they were lawful to possess, but failed to register them and legislation passed in the late 1980s and early 1990s prohibited their possession.

Death by a thousand cuts.

There are still those that think a ban and confiscation of firearms won't even be attempted by the left.


They won't vote for an outright ban.  They vote for a "sensible registration".  And then round up anyone who doesn't comply.


This is a BS law and this guy should challange based on the fact that his right was indeed "Infringed" upon.   He's got nothing to lose now.  Perhaps if the DC case goes to the SCOTUS and is upheld it will overturn this CA law.


Communists.

In Arizona you cannot possess a firearms while on probation. What's the Kalifornia rule?

Quoted: what a f***ing joke this law is... ------------------------------------------- Apr 19, 2007 4:29 pm US/Pacific Isaacson said Bailey, who purchased the firearms throttled his wife when they were lawful to possess when flexin' the pimp hand & chokin' a beyotch was within cultural norms, but failed to register them his beyotch-killin' privilege before legislation passed in the late 1980s and early 1990s prohibited their possession during the '99 - '06 Rotting Non-Game Flesh Amnesty.

what BS....  This shit will spread like cancer.  

Quoted: Death by a thousand cuts. There are still those that think a ban and confiscation of firearms won't even be attempted by the left. They won't vote for an outright ban.  They vote for a "sensible registration".  And then round up anyone who doesn't comply. This is a BS law and this guy should challange based on the fact that his right was indeed "Infringed" upon.   He's got nothing to lose now.  Perhaps if the DC case goes to the SCOTUS and is upheld it will overturn this CA law. Communists.

Both the California State Supreme Court and the 9th Circuit Court have Ruled that the 2nd Amendment is a Collective Right not an Individual Right.

Only SCOTUS can overturn the crap in California.