

I hope after the eventual SCOTUS win the courts take this umbrella, shove it up Colorado's ass, open it, and give it a jerk for good measure.
|
|
Quoted: Yeah sorry, couldn't remember your username to @ you. Thanks View Quote The case was granted and remanded back to the 4th based on Nysrpa. The thought is the 4th did not want to be the first to over turn an assault weapon based on nysrpa, or any large ban. So here we are with a very well worded case, that the 4th could quote and use to over turn the MD ban. They can point their fingers saying the supreme court told use to take nysrpa in to account and Benitez did such a good job laying it out, its not our fault. Then again they could slow play it and hope the 9th over turns it. But I also bet even thou Cali has appealed they are getting phone calls to drop it and let it go and take one for the team. But we know newfag in cali CAN NOT take a loss as he is looking at higher office and a smack down is not a good way to start off. To EVERYONE if you have not read this, you really need to. He wrote it as well as thomas wrote nysrpa. He covered all the bases and did it on more than just mags. Here is where he was really smart, he can look at what cali uses to appeal this, and work it in to the miller v bonta |
|
Quoted:
View Quote am I remembering that correctly? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: You are in the 9th, and CA will appeal this case to the 9th, to stall if nothing else. Last time a 3 judge panel upheld the ruling striking down the ban, but the full court reversed it. It was then appealed to the Supremes and was waiting for Bruin, then sent back down after Bruin. The 9th should have reversed their decision, but they sent it back to the district court to stall. View Quote Yep |
|
Quoted: Can the 9th extend the stay indefinitely? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: And there it is. The 9th will slow walk the appeal and delay until the composition of the Supreme Court has changed in the liberals favor. No, SCOTUS has been very clear that they will jump into these cases if they try to pull that shit. The whole "we will compel you to act legally and expeditiously" has been used already in other circuits and given this case was GVR'd just recently after already being upheld on appeal, they don't have much leeway in saying things like plaintiffs dont have a good chance of winning on the merits or using anything other than strict scrutiny to weigh the case. Bruen was written to deal with that shit and this is the end game of that. What happens after the 10 day stay? We wait forever for the 9th to move forward on the appeal The ban will stay in effect until all appeals are exhausted |
|
Quoted: The case was granted and remanded back to the 4th based on Nysrpa. The thought is the 4th did not want to be the first to over turn an assault weapon based on nysrpa, or any large ban. So here we are with a very well worded case, that the 4th could quote and use to over turn the MD ban. They can point their fingers saying the supreme court told use to take nysrpa in to account and Benitez did such a good job laying it out, its not our fault. Then again they could slow play it and hope the 9th over turns it. But I also bet even thou Cali has appealed they are getting phone calls to drop it and let it go and take one for the team. But we know newfag in cali CAN NOT take a loss as he is looking at higher office and a smack down is not a good way to start off. To EVERYONE if you have not read this, you really need to. He wrote it as well as thomas wrote nysrpa. He covered all the bases and did it on more than just mags. Here is where he was really smart, he can look at what cali uses to appeal this, and work it in to the miller v bonta View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yeah sorry, couldn't remember your username to @ you. Thanks The case was granted and remanded back to the 4th based on Nysrpa. The thought is the 4th did not want to be the first to over turn an assault weapon based on nysrpa, or any large ban. So here we are with a very well worded case, that the 4th could quote and use to over turn the MD ban. They can point their fingers saying the supreme court told use to take nysrpa in to account and Benitez did such a good job laying it out, its not our fault. Then again they could slow play it and hope the 9th over turns it. But I also bet even thou Cali has appealed they are getting phone calls to drop it and let it go and take one for the team. But we know newfag in cali CAN NOT take a loss as he is looking at higher office and a smack down is not a good way to start off. To EVERYONE if you have not read this, you really need to. He wrote it as well as thomas wrote nysrpa. He covered all the bases and did it on more than just mags. Here is where he was really smart, he can look at what cali uses to appeal this, and work it in to the miller v bonta The YouTube generation doesn’t read. They wait for Mark4pizzaboxes or unarmed long winded scholar to tell them what to think |
|
I'll hold off on the champagne. This all has a long way to go. If it gets there at all.
|
|
Quoted: Ignoring the fact that this is a great decision, stuff like this is just as cringe as this candle some covidiot made of Fauci. https://i.etsystatic.com/26094287/r/il/05843a/2661758846/il_794xN.2661758846_iyd4.jpg View Quote It's called humor. Try it sometime. You might like it. |
|
Quoted: Ignoring the fact that this is a great decision, stuff like this is just as cringe as this candle some covidiot made of Fauci. https://i.etsystatic.com/26094287/r/il/05843a/2661758846/il_794xN.2661758846_iyd4.jpg View Quote Celebrity Prayer Candles are a thing. ![]() But yeah, he is far from a saint. |
|
Quoted: The ban will stay in effect until all appeals are exhausted View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: And there it is. The 9th will slow walk the appeal and delay until the composition of the Supreme Court has changed in the liberals favor. No, SCOTUS has been very clear that they will jump into these cases if they try to pull that shit. The whole "we will compel you to act legally and expeditiously" has been used already in other circuits and given this case was GVR'd just recently after already being upheld on appeal, they don't have much leeway in saying things like plaintiffs dont have a good chance of winning on the merits or using anything other than strict scrutiny to weigh the case. Bruen was written to deal with that shit and this is the end game of that. What happens after the 10 day stay? We wait forever for the 9th to move forward on the appeal The ban will stay in effect until all appeals are exhausted Will the 9th pick it up and action the stay within 10 days or is there likely to be a freedom period between when the stay ends and the 9th does something different? |
|
Quoted: The case was granted and remanded back to the 4th based on Nysrpa. The thought is the 4th did not want to be the first to over turn an assault weapon based on nysrpa, or any large ban. So here we are with a very well worded case, that the 4th could quote and use to over turn the MD ban. They can point their fingers saying the supreme court told use to take nysrpa in to account and Benitez did such a good job laying it out, its not our fault. Then again they could slow play it and hope the 9th over turns it. But I also bet even thou Cali has appealed they are getting phone calls to drop it and let it go and take one for the team. But we know newfag in cali CAN NOT take a loss as he is looking at higher office and a smack down is not a good way to start off. To EVERYONE if you have not read this, you really need to. He wrote it as well as thomas wrote nysrpa. He covered all the bases and did it on more than just mags. Here is where he was really smart, he can look at what cali uses to appeal this, and work it in to the miller v bonta View Quote Yes, people really should take the time to read the 71 page opinion. He does a great job dismantling the state's arguments. No doubt large portions will be similarly used if/when he strikes down the Cali AWB. Wouldn't be surprised to see that one drop soon or even next week. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: I haven't read it and don't have time right now ![]() |
|
If the 9th does the right thing on this, hope the gun stores are stocking up, it will be payday weekend to boot...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Gavin's not happy lol!
View Quote FUCK gavin newsom |
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/480443/Screenshot_20230922_200417_Kindle_jpg-2962897.JPG View Quote Patriots poetry. ![]() |
|
What do you think would happen if we made laws that put criminals into jails?
|
|
Quoted: Yes, people really should take the time to read the 71 page opinion. He does a great job dismantling the state's arguments. No doubt large portions will be similarly used if/when he strikes down the Cali AWB. Wouldn't be surprised to see that one drop soon or even next week. View Quote Read the whole thing. He did a great job. |
|
Benitez usually releases decisions on the Friday before holiday weekends. He released this one on the California AGs birthday, lol!
|
|
Quoted: You read it wrong then. He said Miller was right WRT the SBS and nothing in there is gonna overturn the NFA (actually Heller said that and he concurred). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Reading it, Miller got a shout-out. Arms suitable for militia use are protected... You read it wrong then. He said Miller was right WRT the SBS and nothing in there is gonna overturn the NFA (actually Heller said that and he concurred). I read it again, and I suggest you and everyone else does. He said that an arm suitable for militia use would be protected and that the Miller case was correct in a restriction on an arm not suitable for militia use. The arm in question in the case was an SBS, but the standard was suitability for use by the militia. Frankly, I don't think that any SBS should be restricted by a plain reading of 2A. I do have reservations about the suitability for militia use of a sawed off double barrel when there are better options available. |
|
Quoted: Remember, Duncan was remanded from the SCOTUS in light of Bruen and 9th Circuit has begrudgingly accepted that they have to follow Bruen as well else face the wrath of SCOTUS. Duncan has won once and it will win again while the appeals court is on notice that if they purposely disregard higher decisions, its not going to go well for them. View Quote Problem is, what does this mean? Angry worded memo? Nothing punitive happens to the courts nor judges. |
|
Quoted: Gavin's not happy lol!
View Quote This sounds like an insurrectionist attack on our Judiciary. |
|
Be sure to donate to CRPA to fund the challenge all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary. It’s not over yet.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: i'm sure it would come back to bite constitutionalists in the ass, but I wish SCOTUS had some sort of enforcement mechanism on lower court judges, like removal, monetary penalties, loss of pension. If they try to piss on SCOTUS's back and tell them it's raining. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Remember, Duncan was remanded from the SCOTUS in light of Bruen and 9th Circuit has begrudgingly accepted that they have to follow Bruen as well else face the wrath of SCOTUS. Duncan has won once and it will win again while the appeals court is on notice that if they purposely disregard higher decisions, its not going to go well for them. i'm sure it would come back to bite constitutionalists in the ass, but I wish SCOTUS had some sort of enforcement mechanism on lower court judges, like removal, monetary penalties, loss of pension. If they try to piss on SCOTUS's back and tell them it's raining. I don't, because the circumstances can easily be flipped and SCOTUS is not the sole arbiter of what is or is not constitutional and can be in error or worse. If a lower court judge did not abide by a ruling from, say, the progressive Warren Court, who basically tossed the law out of the window, should the progressive court been allowed to punish and remove him and other dissenters from their bullshit? |
|
President of California Rifle & Pistol Association explains it all here
![]() Judge Benitez finally drops Duncan v. Bonta Decision |
|
|
Benitez should have added something to the effect of, the state of CA has admitted that it's laws are unconstitutional by their proposal of the 28th amendment.
|
|
|
As Justice Alito proclaimed in his fiery lone dissent:
[T]he majority’s understanding of the “executive Power” seems to be that a President can disobey statutory commands unless Congress, by flexing its muscles, forces capitulation. That is not the Constitution’s conception ... . [It] instead, requires a President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: There seems to be some misunderstanding here about where our membership fees are going. ![]() View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: Gavin's not happy lol!
View Quote ![]() |
|
Quoted: If so he should be releasing all three decisions in a short timespan. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I thought I had read somewhere that there is a 3-judge panel assigned for all incoming appeals for a month such as Sept, and then a new 3-judge panel is assigned for all Oct appeals. so, the thought was that Benitez could time his ruling so that the appeal could be assigned to a "good" panel. not sure if that is true, and if so, do we know who the 3-judge panel for Sept is ? If so he should be releasing all three decisions in a short timespan. one would hope. my concern is that if he waits too much more for the other cases, than CA could wait a week and then appeal in Oct for a better panel. |
|
Quoted: It's time to throw that little fuck out https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/048/668/stormtrooper-hump.gif?1318992465 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Gavin's not happy lol!
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/048/668/stormtrooper-hump.gif?1318992465 ![]() |
|
![]() Judge Benitez Strikes Down Magazine Bans!!! |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.