What the fuck is up with liberal dummycunts??
Jay Leno is a hard-core Democrat, yet when it's HIS hobby/passion that's threatened.....well, you know the rest....
CALIFORNIA
Emission responsible?
Classic car buffs upset over pending law that will cut exemptions from smog tests
Michael Taylor, Chronicle Staff Writer
Saturday, September 18, 2004
Kurt Fischer owns a pristine Porsche 911SC -- its color is "platinum metallic," it has leather seats, it is quite fast, and it passes the state's biennial smog test handily.
In fact, Fischer, vice president of the Porsche Club of America's Redwood Region chapter, was looking forward to the day when his 1980 car would no longer have to undergo this rite of re-registration passage, the day when the "30-year rolling exemption" would allow the San Anselmo health care executive to skip smog tests on the Porsche forever more.
But if
Assemblywoman Sally Lieber, D-Mountain View, has her way, and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signs her bill, then Fischer and thousands of other California car collectors and auto buffs will have to line up their quasi- vintage Corvettes, Mustangs, Ferraris, Camaros and other go-fast cars with everyone else (that mundane crowd of Accords, Camrys and Explorers) to be subjected to the state's stringent smog checks.
The bill, AB2683, would close a loophole that allows cars that turn 30 to be exempt from smog checks. If it becomes law, all vehicles of 1976 vintage and newer will be barred from Former Smog Check Heaven. Cars of 1975 and older vintage would still be exempt from having their engines minutely inspected and their tailpipes invaded by small metal testing wands.
Lieber's bill, which the Legislature approved last month, has made the state's car buffs furious -- so furious that Lieber recently heard from an anonymous smog-check hater who phoned in a death threat. The California Highway Patrol is investigating.
The normally cheerful Jay Leno, a car collector of note, has weighed in on the issue with a couple of serious calls to Lieber's Sacramento office, registering his disapproval of this new wrinkle in the smog laws. Leno's spokesman, Dick Guttman of Beverly Hills, said via e-mail that Leno "arrives at conclusions in such matters as a private citizen and does not express them to the media or, for that matter, to me." For California's historically vocal car cultists, this bill is anathema. Auto enthusiasts, by their nature, are usually independent, a characteristic that for decades has crashed up against the state's highly restrictive smog laws. In the car world, there has always been an "us vs. them" mind-set -- car freaks against the bureaucrats.
Car buffs, by and large, have few kind words for the California Air Resources Board, possibly the most influential state governmental agency in the automotive world because of the power it wields in getting stiff emissions laws passed.
So when the Lieber bill surfaced -- a bill, incidentally, that, if signed into law, would be enforced by the state Bureau of Automotive Repair and not the Air Resources Board -- the car collectors started yelling.
"This is just an added burden on (car) owners," said Steve Banich, editor of the Web site and newsletter of the Northern California chapter of the National Corvette Restorers Society. "It's unnecessary. I wrote the governor and asked him to veto the bill, but I got no response. A lot of people in the car collector hobby are riled up about this."
Banich said many collectors of 1976 and newer cars have modified their engines. Frequently, car experts say, this involves removing the smog controls.
Older cars, especially those made in the 1970s when smog control technology was in its crude infancy, simply perform better without the smog devices. Some owners replace their engines every two years on the eve of their cars' biennial smog tests, swapping out a powerful, unsmoggable engine and replacing it, for a day or two, with a docile motor that the smog-test machinery just loves. Others hook up the old smog systems for the day of the smog test, then remove them after the car passes.
But there are some owners who, anticipating that their cars would be exempt from smog tests, have thrown away the old smog controls. If they can't find replacement parts for the smog systems, they may have a problem when it comes time to re-register their cars.
Lieber, a bit surprised by the fuss she has caused -- she said she has received "thousands of angry calls, letters and e-mails" -- said she was simply trying to get old polluting vehicles off the road. She pointed to her staff's research showing that "an average 1976-model-year car emits about 155 times more hydrocarbons per mile driven than a 2004-model-year car."
The staff researchers also said that by the year 2010, cars built before 1982 "are projected to account for 22 percent of the hydrocarbons and 11 percent of the nitrogen oxide emissions ... despite accounting (for) only 2.6 percent of the vehicle population and 1.3 percent of the miles traveled."
Lieber said she got the idea for the legislation from Thomas Addison, advanced projects adviser for the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
In an e-mail to The Chronicle, Addison said car enthusiasts should stop worrying.
"Car buffs who say this hurts their hobby have been misled about what the bill would do, or are being disingenuous," Addison wrote. "All pre-'76 cars are specifically exempted from smog under the bill. True car buffs maintain their vehicles, so those who own post-'76 cars have nothing to fear. They'll pass smog easily since they keep their cars maintained. But those who want to strip the smog control equipment off their vehicles oppose this bill, because it will be harder for them to break the law if it is signed."
Nonetheless, auto buffs see this newest wrinkle as an example of what they call an encroaching and meddlesome bureaucracy whose agents will appear at your door some day in the not-too-distant future with a court order to confiscate, for example, all non-smog-conforming Corvettes, or all 356 series Porsches.
So far, it hasn't happened. But the hard and fast reality -- and it is nothing new to California -- is that the government wants to get older vehicles off the road. To this end, the air quality district in the Bay Area sends out letters like the one Fischer got last month, asking him to "consider an alternative to driving" his 1980 Porsche, which, incidentally, passes the state's smog tests.
The district said it would be happy to pay Fischer $500 for the car as part of its program that eventually scraps "1981 and older vehicles."
He declined the offer.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/09/18/BAGG08QTDM1.DTL