User Panel
Posted: 4/19/2016 4:58:13 PM EDT
Well shit. Regulations can't force people to use common sense, like not intentionally jamming the controls with an improvisation easily overlooked in pre-flight:
CNN
The crash of a huge C-130J cargo plane that killed 14 people in Afghanistan in October is being blamed on the misuse of a night-vision goggles case, according to a U.S. Air Force investigation report. The flight crashed 28 seconds after takeoff from Jalalabad Airport near the Afghan-Pakistani border on October 2 as it was heading to Bagram Airfield. Initially, the Taliban said Islamist fighters had downed the four-engine plane, but U.S. military officials immediately shed doubt on those claims. The dead included the pilot, co-pilot, two loadmasters, two security team members and five contractors as passengers. Three Afghan guards on the ground were also killed when the plane hit a guard tower, said the report, which was released Friday. While the plane was on the ground loading and offloading cargo, the pilot placed the goggles case in front of the cockpit yoke, which is used to steer the plane during flight. The pilot put the case there to prop up part of the plane's tail -- the elevators -- to help the loading team deal with some tall cargo. The goggles case was never removed from the cockpit yoke. During the first seconds of takeoff, the plane's nose started to pitch up too far, so the pilot tried to adjust by moving the yoke forward. But the goggles case blocked the yoke. Read the U.S. Air Force crash investigation report (PDF): Link The pilot "misidentified the ensuing flight control problem," the report said, "resulting in improper recovery techniques" by both the pilot and the co-pilot. The plane's nose pitched upward too fast, leading to a stall and a crash, the report said. The aircraft exploded upon impact, it said, and everyone on board died instantly. "The blocking of the flight controls during loading operations is a non-standard procedure," the report said, "as such, there is no regulatory guidance to prohibit the act, or to address the proper placement and removal of the object blocking the controls." The report said it was the responsibility of the pilot and co-pilot to remember to remove the goggles case, even though it wasn't on their checklist before takeoff. The Air Force said the C-130J Hercules cost $48.5 million per aircraft. The Pentagon identified the airmen killed in the crash as Capt. Jonathan J. Golden, 33, of Camarillo, California; Capt. Jordan B. Pierson, 28, of Abilene, Texas; Staff Sgt. Ryan D. Hammond, 26, of Moundsville, West Virginia; Senior Airman Quinn L. Johnson-Harris, 21, of Milwaukee; Senior Airman Nathan C. Sartain, 29, of Pensacola, Florida; and Airman 1st Class Kcey E. Ruiz, 21, of McDonough, Georgia. Golden, Pierson, Hammond and Johnson-Harris were assigned to the 39th Airlift Squadron, Dyess Air Force Base, Texas. Sartain and Ruiz were assigned to the 66th Security Forces Squadron, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts. View Quote |
|
So how did they miss the position of the tail on their preflight walk around....
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Damn that's awful.
I thought it was SOP to move the yoke and pedals before flight to check for free movement. |
|
Quoted:
So how did they miss the position of the tail on their preflight walk around.... Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile View Quote How did they miss something in front of the yoke during taxi and takeoff? I'm guessing they were wearing NVG's. ..Still, no excuse. It took an extraordinary amount of complacency on the part of both pilots, also fatigue probably played a part. |
|
"The blocking of the flight controls during loading operations is a non-standard procedure," the report said, "as such, there is no regulatory guidance to prohibit the act, or to address the proper placement and removal of the object blocking the controls."
I'm with you OP, do they really need regulatory guidance to tell them to not block their damn flight controls??? Darwin award to the pilot. Too bad he took others with him. P.S. In the fighter world part of the launch sequence is to go "around the horn" with the stick making sure it has full travel in all directions and ensuring the control surfaces respond correctly. Guess that isn't done in the cargo world. |
|
Read the report.
ERO = Engine Running Onload/ Offload. They never shutdown the engines while the cargo was being loaded. Yes, this could have been prevented. Yes, something this small can be missed by a crew. |
|
Quoted:
"The blocking of the flight controls during loading operations is a non-standard procedure," the report said, "as such, there is no regulatory guidance to prohibit the act, or to address the proper placement and removal of the object blocking the controls." I'm with you OP, do they really need regulatory guidance to tell them to not block their damn flight controls??? Darwin award to the pilot. Too bad he took others with him. P.S. In the fighter world part of the launch sequence is to go "around the horn" with the stick making sure it has full travel in all directions and ensuring the control surfaces respond correctly. Guess that isn't done in the cargo world. View Quote On the 135 the flight control check is done pretty early in the check and wouldn't be generally repeated for a turn where the crew didn't get off the jet. |
|
I've done it. Need to prop the elevators up to clear a high mast on a forklift. Wedge something in front of the yolk so the loadmasters can get the equipment up to the ramp. We usually use a pelican case for one of our laptops or a cargo strap around the yolk to the seat.
Before takeoff checklists has a flight controls check. Not sure about air force though. |
|
How do they know if all died? Was the case still wedged there?
|
|
Slight thread drift...didn't we lose an AC-130 years ago when one of the gunners dropped a flare down the barrel of either the howitzer or bofors cannon, the flare got stuck, and he tried to dislodge it by firing another round behind it?
Is this C-130J a new production model? Or is it like a 1950's or 1960's model that got new engines and curved props? I am surprised by the $48.5 million price tag. Years ago, MAC would put a little magazine called the MAC flyer. I remember ine article was titled "Complacency Kills". |
|
Quoted:
So how did they miss the position of the tail on their preflight walk around.... Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile View Quote how about the whole controls free and clear check? pull back on the yoke, push forward on the yoke - watch the ailerons as you turn the yoke? That basic flight pre-check? |
|
On every airplane I've ever flown, "Flight Controls-Free and Correct". Was part of the pre takeoff check. It's a standard thing. You do it, even on planes where you might be using a memory checklist rather than the standard Challenge and Response format.
If you think about it, it's one of only a handful of items that really matter. Fuel, Flaps, Flight Controls, Power, Instruments (if you are feeling particularily detail oriented). That's only 5 fucking things to remember, but they will kill you if you forget them. |
|
Quoted: Slight thread drift...didn't we lose an AC-130 years ago when one of the gunners dropped a flare down the barrel of either the howitzer or bofors cannon, the flare got stuck, and he tried to dislodge it by firing another round behind it? Is this C-130J a new production model? Or is it like a 1950's or 1960's model that got new engines and curved props? I am surprised by the $48.5 million price tag. Years ago, MAC would put a little magazine called the MAC flyer. I remember ine article was titled "Complacency Kills". View Quote Last new production model. Less crew, more computers, higher performance. |
|
Quoted:
What Is a jury rig? View Quote Use something not necessarily designed for a particular use. Similar to using duck tape to affix a sling to a rifle, use JB weld to plug a hole in a gas tank, using cork to plug a hole in a radiator, use paracord secure a tent. Lots of terms one involving a racial sub group and the term engineering or slander and the term rig. In the .mil world the term is probably something like field expedited repair. Basically a cobble job that is not meant to be a permanent fix. In this case it like using a cinder block to prop open a door that keep getting in the way. |
|
Remember the experimental Caribou that crashed on take off some years back because the gust locks were still engaged: close ground video of stall and crash
|
|
Quoted: What Is a jury rig? View Quote Jury rigging refers to makeshift repairs or temporary contrivances, made with only the tools and materials that happen to be on hand, originally a nautical term. On sailing ships, a jury rig is a replacement mast and yards (which hold the ship's rigging) improvised in case of damage or loss of the original mast.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_rig#cite_note-alt.usage.english-1][1][/url] |
|
Quoted:
What Is a jury rig? View Quote Like zip tying your bumper to your car. It's a half ass fix. I never had issues with loading tall cargo on a 130 that required the pilot to mess with the elevators. We always had spotters to watch out for stuff like that, even during EROs. If the load/pilot had to fuck with their flight controls in order to make it fit, it shouldn't have gone on the plane in the first place. Sad shit. |
|
|
Quoted: Like zip tying your bumper to your car. It's a half ass fix. I never had issues with loading tall cargo on a 130 that required the pilot to mess with the elevators. We always had spotters to watch out for stuff like that, even during EROs. If the load/pilot had to fuck with their flight controls in order to make it fit, it shouldn't have gone on the plane in the first place. Sad shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What Is a jury rig? Like zip tying your bumper to your car. It's a half ass fix. I never had issues with loading tall cargo on a 130 that required the pilot to mess with the elevators. We always had spotters to watch out for stuff like that, even during EROs. If the load/pilot had to fuck with their flight controls in order to make it fit, it shouldn't have gone on the plane in the first place. Sad shit. I'll have to disagree, because I've seen it multiple times over the space of 16 years on Hercs. The inner edges of the elevators absolutely can be problematic when loading out-sized cargo under certain conditions. Yes, we used spotters. |
|
|
I'm not gonna criticize other than to say the guy who fucked up paid with his life and we lost a lot of good people. We've all made bad bad choices but in avionics bad choices even something that seems minor can end in quick death. Thoughts and prayers to all involved...
|
|
Quoted:
I'll have to disagree, because I've seen it multiple times over the space of 16 years on Hercs. The inner edges of the elevators absolutely can be problematic when loading out-sized cargo under certain conditions. Yes, we used spotters. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What Is a jury rig? Like zip tying your bumper to your car. It's a half ass fix. I never had issues with loading tall cargo on a 130 that required the pilot to mess with the elevators. We always had spotters to watch out for stuff like that, even during EROs. If the load/pilot had to fuck with their flight controls in order to make it fit, it shouldn't have gone on the plane in the first place. Sad shit. I'll have to disagree, because I've seen it multiple times over the space of 16 years on Hercs. The inner edges of the elevators absolutely can be problematic when loading out-sized cargo under certain conditions. Yes, we used spotters. I always was leery of loading shit like ISU-90s and other stuff that was near max height because of that reason. We were super cautious about it, and if it looked like it was going to hit without moving the elevators, we bumped it and loaded it on a larger bird just to be safe. I once asked a load if they COULD raise them, and I got told if it didn't fit without raising them, they wouldn't take it. Didn't question it after that. I also hated driving 10K ATs because of how close the cab was to the jet... rather load a pallet with a 60K. |
|
Damn I flew over the site after this happened and saw the wreckage...damn
|
|
Quoted: I always was leery of loading shit like ISU-90s and other stuff that was near max height because of that reason. We were super cautious about it, and if it looked like it was going to hit without moving the elevators, we bumped it and loaded it on a larger bird just to be safe. I once asked a load if they COULD raise them, and I got told if it didn't fit without raising them, they wouldn't take it. Didn't question it after that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What Is a jury rig? Like zip tying your bumper to your car. It's a half ass fix. I never had issues with loading tall cargo on a 130 that required the pilot to mess with the elevators. We always had spotters to watch out for stuff like that, even during EROs. If the load/pilot had to fuck with their flight controls in order to make it fit, it shouldn't have gone on the plane in the first place. Sad shit. I'll have to disagree, because I've seen it multiple times over the space of 16 years on Hercs. The inner edges of the elevators absolutely can be problematic when loading out-sized cargo under certain conditions. Yes, we used spotters. I always was leery of loading shit like ISU-90s and other stuff that was near max height because of that reason. We were super cautious about it, and if it looked like it was going to hit without moving the elevators, we bumped it and loaded it on a larger bird just to be safe. I once asked a load if they COULD raise them, and I got told if it didn't fit without raising them, they wouldn't take it. Didn't question it after that. I'm a dinosaur, and have been told repeatedly that I served in a different AF. It wasn't normal, but it occurred on occasion. And back then, if we could safely get cargo on board and complete the mission, it went. Crashes suck, regardless of reasons. I just hope the lessons learned from this one prevent another occurrence. |
|
Quoted:
I'm a dinosaur, and have been told repeatedly that I served in a different AF. It wasn't normal, but it occurred on occasion. And back then, if we could safely get cargo on board and complete the mission, it went. Crashes suck, regardless of reasons. I just hope the lessons learned from this one prevent another occurrence. View Quote We both did, and I only got out 2 years ago. Shit changed FAST. Used to operate under the same conditions. If we could make it fit without damaging the plane or cause it to be out of balance, it went. Now, if it just looks like it'll fuck something up, it gets bumped until it gets corrected to where the load is happy or the plane leaves. |
|
|
Quoted:
Jury rigging refers to makeshift repairs or temporary contrivances, made with only the tools and materials that happen to be on hand, originally a nautical term. On sailing ships, a jury rig is a replacement mast and yards (which hold the ship's rigging) improvised in case of damage or loss of the original mast.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_rig#cite_note-alt.usage.english-1][1][/url] View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What Is a jury rig? Jury rigging refers to makeshift repairs or temporary contrivances, made with only the tools and materials that happen to be on hand, originally a nautical term. On sailing ships, a jury rig is a replacement mast and yards (which hold the ship's rigging) improvised in case of damage or loss of the original mast.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_rig#cite_note-alt.usage.english-1][1][/url] Also known as Afro Engineering. |
|
|
Quoted:
On the 135 the flight control check is done pretty early in the check and wouldn't be generally repeated for a turn where the crew didn't get off the jet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"The blocking of the flight controls during loading operations is a non-standard procedure," the report said, "as such, there is no regulatory guidance to prohibit the act, or to address the proper placement and removal of the object blocking the controls." I'm with you OP, do they really need regulatory guidance to tell them to not block their damn flight controls??? Darwin award to the pilot. Too bad he took others with him. P.S. In the fighter world part of the launch sequence is to go "around the horn" with the stick making sure it has full travel in all directions and ensuring the control surfaces respond correctly. Guess that isn't done in the cargo world. On the 135 the flight control check is done pretty early in the check and wouldn't be generally repeated for a turn where the crew didn't get off the jet. That checks, not sure about a 130 thru-flight though. If it was an ERO I think they just pull the ramp up and blast off. ETA: Reading is fundamental. |
|
Quoted:
Line up checks...yup. This isn't passing the stink test. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn that's awful. I thought it was SOP to move the yoke and pedals before flight to check for free movement. Line up checks...yup. This isn't passing the stink test. It happens. Whether it's fatigue, complacency or any number of external factors, it happens in both civil and military aviation. Here's a longish article about the G-4 crash in Bedford MA caused by the gust lock being engaged. Click here |
|
It's not the first time, and sounds like pretty much the same situation to me. I remember when this one happened.
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19861004-0 |
|
Quoted: Probably similar to n*&&^r rig, but I don't know. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
I've done it. Need to prop the elevators up to clear a high mast on a forklift. Wedge something in front of the yolk so the loadmasters can get the equipment up to the ramp. We usually use a pelican case for one of our laptops or a cargo strap around the yolk to the seat. Before takeoff checklists has a flight controls check. Not sure about air force though. View Quote Hope it doesn't slip while someone is under the elevator. |
|
i'm calling BS. The elevator does not hang down low enough to interfere with loading anything that will fit.
|
|
Quoted:
On every airplane I've ever flown, "Flight Controls-Free and Correct". Was part of the pre takeoff check. It's a standard thing. You do it, even on planes where you might be using a memory checklist rather than the standard Challenge and Response format. If you think about it, it's one of only a handful of items that really matter. Fuel, Flaps, Flight Controls, Power, Instruments (if you are feeling particularily detail oriented). That's only 5 fucking things to remember, but they will kill you if you forget them. View Quote My checklist : CIGAR Controls Instruments Gas Aircraft Run up. |
|
Quoted:
It happens. Whether it's fatigue, complacency or any number of external factors, it happens in both civil and military aviation. Here's a longish article about the G-4 crash in Bedford MA caused by the gust lock being engaged. Click here View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn that's awful. I thought it was SOP to move the yoke and pedals before flight to check for free movement. Line up checks...yup. This isn't passing the stink test. It happens. Whether it's fatigue, complacency or any number of external factors, it happens in both civil and military aviation. Here's a longish article about the G-4 crash in Bedford MA caused by the gust lock being engaged. Click here Wow....just, wow CVR data and pilot interviews revealed that checklists simply were not used. This was not an anomaly, it was standard operating procedure for them. Flight control checks were not performed on this flight, nor were they ever performed. Hundreds of flights worth of data from the FDR and pilot interviews confirm it. |
|
|
Tragic, but not shocking.
The RAF almost lost one of their brand-spanking-new A330 tankers (Airbus KC2 Voyager, Ser. No. ZZ333) due to digital camera becoming wedged between the pilot's seat arm rest and the side-stick controller. See: http://news.aviation-safety.net/2015/03/23/report-wedged-camera-at-sidestick-causes-airbus-a330-loss-of-altitude-incident-2/ "On February 9, 2014 an RAF Airbus A330, modified as a Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT), departed RAF Brize Norton on a transport flight to Camp Bastion Air Base in Afghanistan. On board were 189 passengers and nine crew members. "With the aircraft in the cruise at FL330 over Turkey and auto-pilot 1 engaged, the co-pilot had left his seat and was in the forward galley in the vicinity of the forward left passenger door. The captain reported that he suddenly felt a sensation of weightlessness and being restrained by his harness, accompanied by a rapid pitching down of the aircraft. He attempted to take control by pulling back on his side-stick controller and pressing the auto-pilot disconnect button but these actions were ineffective. ... "The captain took control, setting Take-off and Go-around power and subsequently re-establishing a power attitude combination for straight and level flight at FL310. The aircraft had lost 4,400 feet in 27 seconds, registering a maximum rate-of-descent of approximately 15,800 feet per minute. The g-forces during the event ranged from -0,58g to +2.06g during the recovery. This negative g-forces were sufficient for a significant number of passengers and crew to be thrown towards the cabin roof. Twenty-five passengers and seven crew members were injured. Inside the cabin there was damage to some ceiling panels and seat elements. ... "The Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder information showed that the captain’s side-stick moved at one minute and 44 seconds prior to the event (introducing a sustained, small pitch-down command of 0.8 degrees) and again at the onset of the event (introducing a sustained, fully-forward pitch-down command). The recorders have also shown that the captain’s seat moved at those times. "The movement of the seat was linked to the movement of the side-stick, in the form of a Nikon Digital SLR camera obstruction which was in front of the captain’s left arm rest and behind the base of the Captain’s side-stick at the time of the event. Analysis of the camera has confirmed that it was being used in the three minutes leading up to the event. "Furthermore, forensic analysis of damage to the body of the camera indicates that it experienced a significant compression against the base of the side-stick, consistent with having been jammed between the arm rest and the side-stick unit. Crew interviews have corroborated this evidence." See also: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/service-inquiry-incident-involving-voyager-zz333-on-9-february-2014 |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: It happens. Whether it's fatigue, complacency or any number of external factors, it happens in both civil and military aviation. Here's a longish article about the G-4 crash in Bedford MA caused by the gust lock being engaged. Click here Wow....just, wow CVR data and pilot interviews revealed that checklists simply were not used. This was not an anomaly, it was standard operating procedure for them. Flight control checks were not performed on this flight, nor were they ever performed. Hundreds of flights worth of data from the FDR and pilot interviews confirm it. See both Shuttle accidents for details. It's a very human trait, and that's why following the procedure is important... It's also why it's important to make sure that the procedures aren't onerous. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.