User Panel
Posted: 10/24/2016 3:23:48 PM EDT
This is newsworthy.
Foxnews article on Donna Brazile's e-mails The article starts... "After Democratic Party boss Donna Brazile claimed emails showing her apparently tipping off Hillary Clinton to questions at a March town hall were “doctored,” tech sleuths got to work -- and now say they've found proof the emails are authentic." |
|
She had no choice but to lie. Its what politicians do. They lie to cover lies.
|
|
Of course they are real, wikileaks vets their shit before they publish anything.
|
|
Watching Brazile try to dodge duck dip dive and dodge her way around that question is one of the most painful and yet enjoyable things I've seen in a while.
The democrats truly got fucked by that one, if you run across someone that doesn't believe these emails are legit just have them watch that segment...it's awesome. |
|
RUSSIA
17 AGENCIES CONFIRMED RUSSSIAAAAA Yes, the same Russians we want to work with in Syria. |
|
I think anyone who heard her interviewed knows she is full of shit.
|
|
|
Quoted:
If I may speak in the vernacular, like the pot water from a chittlin' boil View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I think anyone who heard her interviewed knows she is full of shit. If I may speak in the vernacular, like the pot water from a chittlin' boil Have you ever been in a house when someone is preparing the intestines for chittlins? It literally smells like boiled shit! ETA: 'boiled' |
|
|
She got fired from Dukakis's campaign because of her lying.
The Dems just go for the quick headline and move on to lodge the next accusation. |
|
Quoted:
Have you ever been in a house when someone is preparing the intestines for chittlins? It literally smells like boiled shit! ETA: 'boiled' View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think anyone who heard her interviewed knows she is full of shit. If I may speak in the vernacular, like the pot water from a chittlin' boil Have you ever been in a house when someone is preparing the intestines for chittlins? It literally smells like boiled shit! ETA: 'boiled' Yea, I have experienced that displeasure |
|
Why no one has asked her to just release her own emails to prove "the others are fakes" is beyond me.....
|
|
|
Quoted:
Watching Brazile try to dodge duck dip dive and dodge her way around that question is one of the most painful and yet enjoyable things I've seen in a while. The democrats truly got fucked by that one, if you run across someone that doesn't believe these emails are legit just have them watch that segment...it's awesome. View Quote Angry black woman rage doesn't carry the political weight it used to like it did back in the 90's. |
|
|
|
|
She is a christian woman, so god commanded her to stop the evil that Trump would do.
|
|
If Wikileaks has a faction that wants to see the world burn, how about some RNC leaks about their public position against amnesty and their private Chamber of Commerce position supporting it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant.
If you didn't read the link, or didn't think it explained it fully, DomainKeys (DKIM) creates a cryptographic signature hash of your email using a private key, and allows recipients to verify the signature using your public key, made available through DNS. Only the person who has the private key can create a valid signature. This allows mail servers to verify that mail came from the user it said it came from, to prevent spoofing by spammers. Also, if an email is modified the signature will no longer match. The DKIM signature is created using the body of the message along with a few headers (like the subject and sender). This allows other mail servers in the chain to add their own headers without breaking the signature. If all of these emails have valid DKIM signatures, there is no way they can claim the contents have been modified. |
|
|
Quoted:
Is she slightly retarded, or just talks like one....cause how in the blue fuck can a journalist talk like mush mouth... She (Brazile) sounds like a total idiot... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I think anyone who heard her interviewed knows she is full of shit. Is she slightly retarded, or just talks like one....cause how in the blue fuck can a journalist talk like mush mouth... She (Brazile) sounds like a total idiot... Rev. Jesse Jackson School of Elocution and Social Justusing |
|
Quoted:
Brilliant. If you didn't read the link, or didn't think it explained it fully, DomainKeys (DKIM) creates a cryptographic signature hash of your email using a private key, and allows recipients to verify the signature using your public key, made available through DNS. Only the person who has the private key can create a valid signature. This allows mail servers to verify that mail came from the user it said it came from, to prevent spoofing by spammers. Also, if an email is modified the signature will no longer match. The DKIM signature is created using the body of the message along with a few headers (like the subject and sender). This allows other mail servers in the chain to add their own headers without breaking the signature. If all of these emails have valid DKIM signatures, there is no way they can claim the contents have been modified. View Quote Bingo |
|
Quoted:
RUSSIA 17 AGENCIES CONFIRMED RUSSSIAAAAA Yes, the same Russians we want to work with in Syria. View Quote Trump had some serious fuckups in the debates. He wasn't prepared. As soon as Hillary mentioned "17 agencies" he should have replied with: 1) No, federal agencies say Russia is attempting to hack US servers, not the DNC server in particular. 2) Before you say, "I asked them to do it" maybe I should remind you your shit was hacked long before I ever said anything about it, and most importantly 3) 17 agencies? Name them. |
|
Robert is the only guy I know that needed a web server so he wrote his own.
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Watching Brazile try to dodge duck dip dive and dodge her way around that question is one of the most painful and yet enjoyable things I've seen in a while. The democrats truly got fucked by that one, if you run across someone that doesn't believe these emails are legit just have them watch that segment...it's awesome. https://media.giphy.com/media/L2KHKeiYyLEMo/giphy.gif |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Brilliant. If you didn't read the link, or didn't think it explained it fully, DomainKeys (DKIM) creates a cryptographic signature hash of your email using a private key, and allows recipients to verify the signature using your public key, made available through DNS. Only the person who has the private key can create a valid signature. This allows mail servers to verify that mail came from the user it said it came from, to prevent spoofing by spammers. Also, if an email is modified the signature will no longer match. The DKIM signature is created using the body of the message along with a few headers (like the subject and sender). This allows other mail servers in the chain to add their own headers without breaking the signature. If all of these emails have valid DKIM signatures, there is no way they can claim the contents have been modified. Bingo Damn, if she said that under oath her goose would be cooked. |
|
Quoted: Damn, if she said that under oath her goose would be cooked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Brilliant. If you didn't read the link, or didn't think it explained it fully, DomainKeys (DKIM) creates a cryptographic signature hash of your email using a private key, and allows recipients to verify the signature using your public key, made available through DNS. Only the person who has the private key can create a valid signature. This allows mail servers to verify that mail came from the user it said it came from, to prevent spoofing by spammers. Also, if an email is modified the signature will no longer match. The DKIM signature is created using the body of the message along with a few headers (like the subject and sender). This allows other mail servers in the chain to add their own headers without breaking the signature. If all of these emails have valid DKIM signatures, there is no way they can claim the contents have been modified. Bingo Damn, if she said that under oath her goose would be cooked. Congress needs to call her in and question on her corruption...while under oath. |
|
Quoted:
Congress needs to call her in and question on her corruption...while under oath. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Brilliant. If you didn't read the link, or didn't think it explained it fully, DomainKeys (DKIM) creates a cryptographic signature hash of your email using a private key, and allows recipients to verify the signature using your public key, made available through DNS. Only the person who has the private key can create a valid signature. This allows mail servers to verify that mail came from the user it said it came from, to prevent spoofing by spammers. Also, if an email is modified the signature will no longer match. The DKIM signature is created using the body of the message along with a few headers (like the subject and sender). This allows other mail servers in the chain to add their own headers without breaking the signature. If all of these emails have valid DKIM signatures, there is no way they can claim the contents have been modified. Bingo Damn, if she said that under oath her goose would be cooked. Congress needs to call her in and question on her corruption...while under oath. no shit....at that point she will tell the truth or perjur herself. |
|
Quoted:
Trump had some serious fuckups in the debates. He wasn't prepared. As soon as Hillary mentioned "17 agencies" he should have replied with: 1) No, federal agencies say Russia is attempting to hack US servers, not the DNC server in particular. 2) Before you say, "I asked them to do it" maybe I should remind you your shit was hacked long before I ever said anything about it, and most importantly 3) 17 agencies? Name them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
RUSSIA 17 AGENCIES CONFIRMED RUSSSIAAAAA Yes, the same Russians we want to work with in Syria. Trump had some serious fuckups in the debates. He wasn't prepared. As soon as Hillary mentioned "17 agencies" he should have replied with: 1) No, federal agencies say Russia is attempting to hack US servers, not the DNC server in particular. 2) Before you say, "I asked them to do it" maybe I should remind you your shit was hacked long before I ever said anything about it, and most importantly 3) 17 agencies? Name them. Yup. had a chance to say they weren't as secure as her own private email server used for gov business. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Watching Brazile try to dodge duck dip dive and dodge her way around that question is one of the most painful and yet enjoyable things I've seen in a while. The democrats truly got fucked by that one, if you run across someone that doesn't believe these emails are legit just have them watch that segment...it's awesome. View Quote If you're referring to the Megyn Kelly grilling, yes, that was beautiful! DB was getting ready to cry then closes down with the persecution line. Beautiful. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.