Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
Durkin Tactical Franklin Armory
User Panel

Posted: 4/19/2013 6:11:09 PM EDT
From the horses mouth, our fearless leader, is saying the Boston bombing is a terrorist attack live on TV. How is this a terrorist attack if FT hood is not
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:13:09 PM EDT
[#1]
uh, the boston bombers didnt work at the marathon
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:14:18 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
uh, the boston bombers didnt work at the marathon


And they were white........  
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:18:57 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Quoted:
uh, the boston bombers didnt work at the marathon


And they were white........  


ish
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:20:18 PM EDT
[#4]
Because the military wants to try him. If they admit it's a terrorist attack, it falls under civil terrorism, thus it would be tried in a civilian court. You know, where the accused has rights and shit.
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:23:37 PM EDT
[#5]
Because they were going to go all-out with a "tea party terrorist" narrative and so there were no reservations about using that label as soon as the smoke cleared. There's no way they can backtrack on it now so it has to be terrorism.

With the Ft. Hood incident it was almost immediately apparent that the shooter was a Muslim terrorist, so Obama and the progressives were in damage control from the very beginning.
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:36:04 PM EDT
[#6]
In the military you have rights in a court setting just like a civilian court

All over the news they are labeling hoth the brothers as Islamic terrorists so I don't see how this is any different than Ft Hood
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:37:55 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Because the military wants to try him. If they admit it's a terrorist attack, it falls under civil terrorism, thus it would be tried in a civilian court. You know, where the accused has rights and shit.


And the Army is going a bang up job with that.....
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:39:14 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Because the military wants to try him. If they admit it's a terrorist attack, it falls under civil terrorism, thus it would be tried in a civilian court. You know, where the accused has rights and shit.


You may be surprised at how much rights the accused has when he is a soldier.

Miranda rules are much more expanded in the military.  An Officer, NCO, CID, MP, MPI and Counterintelligence Agents all have to read you your rights if they think you have committed a crime.  Just their rank or position is assumed to give the questioning a custodial status which wouldn't be the case in civilian world.

.
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:49:08 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
From the horses mouth, our fearless leader, is saying the Boston bombing is a terrorist attack live on TV. How is this a terrorist attack if FT hood is not
At FT.Hood it was and attack on a military target, making it a act of war. Boston was and attack on civilians hence it was a terrorist attack.

Link Posted: 4/19/2013 6:50:23 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Quoted:
From the horses mouth, our fearless leader, is saying the Boston bombing is a terrorist attack live on TV. How is this a terrorist attack if FT hood is not
At FT.Hood it was and attack on a military target, making it a act of war. Boston was and attack on civilians hence it was a terrorist attack.



pentagon on 9-11 is considered a terrorist attack.

Link Posted: 4/19/2013 7:40:21 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
From the horses mouth, our fearless leader, is saying the Boston bombing is a terrorist attack live on TV. How is this a terrorist attack if FT hood is not
At FT.Hood it was and attack on a military target, making it a act of war. Boston was and attack on civilians hence it was a terrorist attack.



pentagon on 9-11 is considered a terrorist attack.

True, and if I remember correctly most killed were civilians. That one could go either way, if you lump it in with the other planes it becomes a terrorist attack, if you separate it you have a military target with mostly civilians killed.

Link Posted: 4/19/2013 8:03:04 PM EDT
[#12]
I personally believe that the pentagon wasn't a terrorist attack as it was a legitimate military target and Al Queda was in a declared state of war with the US.  That we failed to notice that fact is our fault.
Link Posted: 4/19/2013 8:27:11 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
From the horses mouth, our fearless leader, is saying the Boston bombing is a terrorist attack live on TV. How is this a terrorist attack if FT hood is not
At FT.Hood it was and attack on a military target, making it a act of war. Boston was and attack on civilians hence it was a terrorist attack.



This is my answer also.
Link Posted: 4/23/2013 6:10:42 PM EDT
[#14]
Link Posted: 4/23/2013 6:56:38 PM EDT
[#15]
One was before the election one was after.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top