Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 1/12/2002 11:45:32 PM EST
Okay...I just finished watching Blair Witch 2....I will say that it was better than the first one (sorta' had a classic scare movie look) BUT...I thought they both sucked...I only watched #2 because it was on one of the movie channels and I was bored. I really!! thought #1 SUCKED! what does everyone else think? medcop
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 12:31:51 AM EST
Blair witch 1 sucked so bad I burned the f*cking tape. I'd rather eat a bucket of deep-fried turds than have to sit through the 2nd one.
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 3:05:15 AM EST
The previews sucked so bad I haven't bothered to see either one......Haven't heard anything good from people that have seen 'em.
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 5:46:45 AM EST
I thought Blair I was OK, having never seen a movie shot from that perspective before. At least it was different. Everyone dumped on II so heavily I didn't bother seeing that one.
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 6:02:31 AM EST
I've only seen the first one, so I can't speak to number two. As to 1, I wanted to like it. I really did. It seemed like a cool idea, with the camera perspective and all. But it just did't live up to my expectations. I thought it was pretty bad.
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 6:11:25 AM EST
blair 1 sucked so freakin bad I walked out at about 3/4... [puke] Didnt waste my time with #2
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 6:30:52 AM EST
I saw Blair 1.....I just had to see it because of all the hype. Unfortunately, I thought it sucked. Therefore, I did not bother to see Blair 2. Doubt if I ever will.
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 6:34:46 AM EST
They both sucked, but the tata's were better in BW 2.
Link Posted: 1/13/2002 6:50:03 AM EST
Both sucked. I liked 2 better though, less vertigo.
Top Top