Quoted: On a side note , this is another thread where some members here have convicted a person with no trial. No matter who or what someone is or has done they deserve a trial. You guys seem to rejoice in mob rule, remember it can happen to you too so be careful how you applaud the govt. actions here.
|
You know, one of the glaring oversights in the ArfCom COC is the omission of any means for members to convict anyone of anything. The members also seem to be unable to assemble for any sort of mob action, even when I really need my house painted. However, it is possible for somebody to get on here and denounce
MERE FUCKING CONVERSATION as conviction without trial and mob rule.
Guess what! No matter what people on ArfCom say, Jackson will get a trial unless he pleads guilty, flees the country, gets the charges dismissed, or dies.
Guess what else! The presumption of innocence is a legal presumption that governs the analyses of triers of fact in criminal cases. I will give you some secret, inside information: [whisper]
there is no legal or Constitutional entitlement to a presumption of innocence during conversations among fellow-citizens who are not seated as jurors[/whisper].
There is nothing wrong with people discussing their conclusions based on available information. There's nothing wrong with sanctimonious mewling, either, but it's more annoying.