Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 7/20/2010 10:30:08 AM EDT
From a liberal rag, but none the less.  Hope it aint a dupe.



UPDATE 12:08PM Eastern 7/20/10: BP has faked
yet another oil crisis response photo
on its Web site.





UPDATE:
11:14PM Eastern: BP has now
posted the "original" photo
, they claim.  Except - surprise - they
are refusing to post the high-resolution version of the new "original"
photo.  They posted the high-res version of the altered photo earlier,
and in fact, that version is still live via a link below the new photo.
Why not post the high-res version of the new "original" photo?  Afraid
someone is going to enlarge it and find out it's fake too?





UPDATE
10:37PM Eastern: The
Washington Post has the story now
.  Oddly, BP is now claiming that
the photo is real - but it showed blank screens, and rather than show
blank screens at AP's crisis center, they instead put fake
content-filled screens in the photo.  Uh, a few questions.





1) Why
were the screens in the crisis center blank in the middle of the
crisis?  Coffee break?


2) The BP spokesman claims that the
photographer photoshopped the changes.  Really?  A professional
photographer hired by BP Photoshops so poorly that a 12 year old kid
could do a better job.  Really?  Let me show you what BP said exactly,
and then the photo that supposedly this "professional" edited:

Scott
Dean, a spokesman for BP, said that there was nothing sinister in the
photo alteration and provided the original unaltered version. He said
that a photographer working for the company had inserted the three
images in spots where the video screens were blank.
Now here
is the Photoshop job that the "professional" photographer did - this is
just one part of the photo that he screwed up:









http://www.americablog.com/2010/07/bp-photoshops-fake-photo-of-command.html


 
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:35:52 AM EDT
[#1]
Hory Shet.



PS FAIL. Big time.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:40:49 AM EDT
[#2]
They released the real photo...








 
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:42:15 AM EDT
[#3]


That is the most appropriate photo I've seen pertaining to this whole fubar'd situation.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:42:48 AM EDT
[#4]
That's it?  
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:42:53 AM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:44:13 AM EDT
[#6]
Why would they have a marketing slide prominently on display in this crisis center pic, anyway?
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:44:16 AM EDT
[#7]
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:44:47 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:45:08 AM EDT
[#9]
this reminds me of when that dumbass used the clone tool to add more smoke to a post bombing photo.  these people suck with photoshop.

Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:45:24 AM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:45:41 AM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:46:38 AM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:47:23 AM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


Ummm excuse me, but BP IS government. BP is owned and operated by the British Government.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:47:53 AM EDT
[#14]


Look Joel you can see the strings! lol
I think the prop department juuuust ran out of money.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:48:24 AM EDT
[#15]



Quoted:


but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


their work on the spill, good.  their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.



 
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:50:20 AM EDT
[#16]


I don't care who you are, but that is some funny shit.

Link Posted: 7/20/2010 10:52:27 AM EDT
[#17]




Quoted:





Quoted:

but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.







The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:01:12 AM EDT
[#18]
i love it
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:04:48 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...

their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.



The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....


Why the hate?
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:07:35 AM EDT
[#20]
My guess is that they didnt add the screen, but instead did not like/want the original slide in there so they replaced it and didn't do a good job of it.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:09:53 AM EDT
[#21]
So what?  I don't see a story here.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:09:55 AM EDT
[#22]
I amazed what passes for quality shooping in the real world.



That's C- grade material
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:10:53 AM EDT
[#23]




Quoted:



Quoted:





Quoted:





Quoted:

but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.







The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....




Why the hate?


Cause I believe in showing consistency. If a private enterprise has a big fuck up, they should be equally criticized as the government would be for the same fuck up.



Like I get tired of the idea here that private industry never does anything wrong, that government is the only thing that can fuck things up. People act like if the entire country was run by private business, we'd all be millionaires and nothing would ever go wrong. When in fact, many corporations have been caught lieing to the public and have had big disasters.



I'm no government apologist, I just want to see people show some consistency. If it was a government run entity that did this and handling it THE EXACT SAME WAY that BP is doing it, ARFCOM would be all over that ass calling for heads to roll.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:13:01 AM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:14:02 AM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...

their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.



The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....


Why the hate?

Cause I believe in showing consistency. If a private enterprise has a big fuck up, they should be equally criticized as the government would be for the same fuck up.

Like I get tired of the idea here that private industry never does anything wrong, that government is the only thing that can fuck things up. People act like if the entire country was run by private business, we'd all be millionaires and nothing would ever go wrong. When in fact, many corporations have been caught lieing to the public and have had big disasters.

I'm no government apologist, I just want to see people show some consistency. If it was a government run entity that did this and handling it THE EXACT SAME WAY that BP is doing it, ARFCOM would be all over that ass calling for heads to roll.



Government is accountable to the people who fund it and elect its officials.

Private companies are not accountable to the public.  You don't fund it.  You don't run it.  It isn't accountable to you or me (unless we are huge stockholders).  They don't have to tell you anything.  They can add some photos to a command center publicity shot for visual interest - what difference is it to you?  Did they break the law?  Did they defraud you?  Where is the loss?
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:14:02 AM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:17:28 AM EDT
[#27]




Quoted:



Quoted:





Quoted:



Quoted:





Quoted:





Quoted:

but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.







The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....




Why the hate?


Cause I believe in showing consistency. If a private enterprise has a big fuck up, they should be equally criticized as the government would be for the same fuck up.



Like I get tired of the idea here that private industry never does anything wrong, that government is the only thing that can fuck things up. People act like if the entire country was run by private business, we'd all be millionaires and nothing would ever go wrong. When in fact, many corporations have been caught lieing to the public and have had big disasters.



I'm no government apologist, I just want to see people show some consistency. If it was a government run entity that did this and handling it THE EXACT SAME WAY that BP is doing it, ARFCOM would be all over that ass calling for heads to roll.






Government is accountable to the people who fund it and elect its officials.



Private companies are not accountable to the public. You don't fund it. You don't run it. It isn't accountable to you or me (unless we are huge stockholders). They don't have to tell you anything. They can add some photos to a command center publicity shot for visual interest - what difference is it to you? Did they break the law? Did they defraud you? Where is the loss?


That oil that they spilt because they ignored saftey regulations is going into OUR wildlife habitat and coming onto our beaches, forcing us to have them shut down and keeping fishmen from being able to fish. It isn't just a big ecological mess, it is a huge economic disaster as well.



You bet your ass they are accountable to us when their big fuckup has the rest of us on the hook.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:18:57 AM EDT
[#28]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:21:09 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...

their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.



The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....


Why the hate?

Cause I believe in showing consistency. If a private enterprise has a big fuck up, they should be equally criticized as the government would be for the same fuck up.

Like I get tired of the idea here that private industry never does anything wrong, that government is the only thing that can fuck things up. People act like if the entire country was run by private business, we'd all be millionaires and nothing would ever go wrong. When in fact, many corporations have been caught lieing to the public and have had big disasters.

I'm no government apologist, I just want to see people show some consistency. If it was a government run entity that did this and handling it THE EXACT SAME WAY that BP is doing it, ARFCOM would be all over that ass calling for heads to roll.



Government is accountable to the people who fund it and elect its officials.

Private companies are not accountable to the public. You don't fund it. You don't run it. It isn't accountable to you or me (unless we are huge stockholders). They don't have to tell you anything. They can add some photos to a command center publicity shot for visual interest - what difference is it to you? Did they break the law? Did they defraud you? Where is the loss?

That oil that they spilt because they ignored saftey regulations is going into OUR wildlife habitat and coming onto our beaches, forcing us to have them shut down and keeping fishmen from being able to fish. It isn't just a big ecological mess, it is a huge economic disaster as well.

You bet your ass they are accountable to us when their big fuckup has the rest of us on the hook.


How is this relevant to the command center photo?  I'm missing the connection.

And no - they aren't accountable to the public.  They are accountable to the regulatory agencies within the construct of established federal and state laws.  If they choose to make public statements as part of an oil spill - that is their CHOICE.  They don't OWE you a daily press conference.  They do that as public relations.

Don't confuse what you want with what they are REQUIRED to do.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:21:47 AM EDT
[#30]
It's not as bad as the Iran missile test photoshop...



Still, they don't need to be photoshopping the news.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:28:16 AM EDT
[#31]
That is just sloppy work. My Photoshop teacher would take a letter grade off of your assignment for each pixel he caught out of place.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:30:25 AM EDT
[#32]
Ooooh, what if it was photoshopped to look like a photoshop?
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:31:26 AM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
It's not as bad as the Iran missile test photoshop...

http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/richedit/upload/2k61fd05e78b.jpg

Still, they don't need to be photoshopping the news.


That is a keeper.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:31:35 AM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


Ummm excuse me, but BP IS government. BP is owned and operated by the British Government.


WRONG do some research! The Brit Gov does own some limited shares in BP but it is mainly privately owned

Benefical Owners Of BP Plc
(Plc = PUBLIC limited company, ie not gov.)
Holdings By Principle Area Institutions  Individuals  Total Percentage Shares

United Kingdom  33%  7%  40%  
United States  25%  14%  39%  
Rest of Europe  10%  0%  10%
Rest of World 7% 0% 7%  
Miscellaneous 4% 0% 4%  
Total 79% 21% 100%


Sorry for the cut and paste fuck up
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:35:02 AM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...

BP was owned by the British government for the first half of its life.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:41:06 AM EDT
[#36]



Quoted:







Oh shit you went and did it.

 


Awesome!



 
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:42:30 AM EDT
[#37]
No big conspiracy.  The idiots on the blog who are slamming the poor photoshop job are also pointing out the fact that the EXIF data shows 3/06/2001 as the date the picture was taken as evidence of a BP conspiracy.  They say there's no way a professional photographer wouldn't keep his camera set with the correct date.  Well, never mind the fact that the same EXIF data shows that the photo was taken with a Canon 1Ds Mark III, a camera which wasn't even introduced by Canon until August of 2007!

Sorry, it looks like it's a simple case of someone at BP not liking a few blank screens and doing a quick horrible PS edit to cover them.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:42:50 AM EDT
[#38]
Cue Lootie in ........10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3........
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:54:20 AM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
Cue Lootie nukeboy in ........10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3........


Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:56:03 AM EDT
[#40]




 Is that Sim City?
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 11:57:02 AM EDT
[#41]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:08:51 PM EDT
[#42]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:

but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


their work on the spill, good. their fuck ups pertaining to the lockerbie bomber and some pictures...bad.







The only funny thing about that is, if it was a government run organization that did the exact same thing BP is doing, you'd say how retarded they are and that a private corporation would fix it up the day after the accident....




Why the hate?
dont mind him, he doesnt realize the govt interfered with bp's ops on the spill once they realized how big it was.  funny too because it took over 2 months for the govt to allow a gigantic skimmer ship to work the gulf and is making bp get permission for every operation on the well.
if memory serves, the GOVT is the one building NOLAs new and improved flood wall.





 
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:16:42 PM EDT
[#43]




Quoted:

No big conspiracy. The idiots on the blog who are slamming the poor photoshop job are also pointing out the fact that the EXIF data shows 3/06/2001 as the date the picture was taken as evidence of a BP conspiracy. They say there's no way a professional photographer wouldn't keep his camera set with the correct date. Well, never mind the fact that the same EXIF data shows that the photo was taken with a Canon 1Ds Mark III, a camera which wasn't even introduced by Canon until August of 2007!



Sorry, it looks like it's a simple case of someone at BP not liking a few blank screens and doing a quick horrible PS edit to cover them.


Agreed, or the photo did not show the image on the screen well, so they re pasted over it to make more visible.

Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:28:07 PM EDT
[#44]
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:32:48 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:

Quoted:
No big conspiracy. The idiots on the blog who are slamming the poor photoshop job are also pointing out the fact that the EXIF data shows 3/06/2001 as the date the picture was taken as evidence of a BP conspiracy. They say there's no way a professional photographer wouldn't keep his camera set with the correct date. Well, never mind the fact that the same EXIF data shows that the photo was taken with a Canon 1Ds Mark III, a camera which wasn't even introduced by Canon until August of 2007!

Sorry, it looks like it's a simple case of someone at BP not liking a few blank screens and doing a quick horrible PS edit to cover them.

Agreed, or the photo did not show the image on the screen well, so they re pasted over it to make more visible.


Or the images normally on the screens cannot be released to the public.
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:32:48 PM EDT
[#46]


HOLY HELL, I ROST
Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:39:58 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
but but but but.... only government lies or fucks anything up. Private industry can never do anything wrong or screw shit up, and they ALWAYS do things efficiently...


Who the fuck claims that? Humans in general are fuck ups but private industry is more efficient(I said more efficient not that it actually is always efficient).

And it wouldn't matter if they actually were more or less efficient, government controlling things they shouldn't is immoral no matter what is more efficient.

Link Posted: 7/20/2010 12:57:23 PM EDT
[#48]
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top