Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 12/5/2002 10:20:29 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/5/2002 10:22:57 AM EDT by Imbroglio]
As a compromise on the new "assault weapon" ban and Homeland Defense laws it is proposed that these would only apply those who citizens of non-european descent (Israelis exempt) or those married to such individuals. If this would result in your unrestricted access to all "assault weapons" (imported or domestic) and no loss of any other rights from the war on terrorism, would you support it?
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 10:27:28 AM EDT
No.
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 10:29:06 AM EDT
HELL NO!
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 10:46:58 AM EDT
I voted no... and I don't know where to begin with this one!
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 10:50:06 AM EDT
No.
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 11:06:34 AM EDT
That would be racism. I am aghast any government agency would suggest a racist policy. Or is this the next addition to the department of pre crime?
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 11:09:33 AM EDT
Not acceptable. IIRC, the laws that made ex-slaves defenseless in the old days were struck down as discrimination..... Scott [url]http://www.banknotes.com/CL147.JPG[/url]
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 11:13:18 AM EDT
Imbroglio, is it your goal to point out certain short comings in the Arfcom board or something? I've seen too many slanted threads from you relating to politics, Bush, wars, airline security and now this pile of festering shit? Do you take us for idiots or just racists? (Apology added if this was a serious thread about a real political proposal on the table right now. Post link please.)
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 11:20:22 AM EDT
Aww come on white people, you'd be quite happy with it and you know it.
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 11:29:10 AM EDT
NO! Besides, the HSA is a step in the RIGHT direction (consolidation of federal law enforcement). USA Patriot is another story, but it sunsets in 9yrs (and YES, I do think it will sunset.)
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 11:54:37 AM EDT
Imbroglio Are you frekin Crazy? Who do you think would actually accept this stuff? Do you just post this shit to raise your post count or what?
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 12:03:30 PM EDT
Why wont you support it? A great portion of gunowners are of European decent, so the prices of pre-bans will fall for all. Even persons of non-european decent will get to buy prebans at far lower prices than now. Many of us would support Homeland Defense laws if it only applied to forgeigners within our borders. So what's wrong with extending that to citizens of foreign decent? Explain to me this magic that happens during naturalization that makes somebody [b]not[/b] a security risk. A Mexican blooded kid is born in Chicago and raised in LA vs a Mexican blooded kid born in Tijuana and raised in LA. Biig difference, right?
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 12:13:23 PM EDT
I would support it knowing that it would be declared unconstitutional thus leaving us with [b]NO AW BAN![/b] It would be like throwing a fake bone to a dog. Poor sucker wouldn't know what happened until after it got suckered. The AW ban would be gone, and thanks to the SCOTUS, any offensive law would also be tossed. Don't forget, the AW law will sunset. If it is replaced by an OBVIOUSLY unconstitutional law, then that law will die too. Anti's will be left scratching their asses.
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 12:38:57 PM EDT
And the 94 crime bill wasn't OBVIOUSLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL? hahaha
Link Posted: 12/5/2002 1:36:35 PM EDT
People get all worked up over a racial issue, not flash hiders. An AW ban that was racial/national origin in nature would fall far faster than a "catch-all" AW ban. Your comparison doesn't hold.
Top Top