Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 9/20/2001 11:31:31 AM EST
[Last Edit: 9/20/2001 11:33:20 AM EST by Grundsau]
Most of this makes sense. [url]https://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=2474[/url]
Link Posted: 9/20/2001 11:44:16 AM EST
Bum link?
Link Posted: 9/20/2001 11:57:12 AM EST
cut and paste the link and take the "s" out of "https://"
Link Posted: 9/20/2001 12:56:13 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/20/2001 12:58:41 PM EST by DonS]
Link Posted: 9/20/2001 1:01:23 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/20/2001 1:11:51 PM EST by Willy_]
Pretty good article but there really is no such thing as a "licensed aircraft engineer". And the first guy commenting is a mechanic, not an engineer. The opinions we should seek out on the structural integrity of an aircraft with small penetrations in the outer skin, should come from strength engineers and designers from Boeing and Airbus. I am qualified enough to give an opinion, but that is all it is, an opinion. Everybody has them. Engineering is based on hard facts. If testing has not already been done, we should start it.
Link Posted: 9/21/2001 1:42:00 PM EST
Thanx for fixing the link. Don't know how that "s" appeared. Typos always seem to happen after I post. [:D]
Link Posted: 9/21/2001 3:46:24 PM EST
They are correct about the pressurization system. Also, the fuselage is made with multiple seams as rip stop prevention in the event of a catastophic failure or damage. That was clearly seen on the metal fatiqued Aloha 737. The failure followed the seams. This is a non-issue. The cabin pressurization is no a high priority in a hostage situation. The order of priority is AVIATE, NAVIGATE, COMMUNICATE. Cabin pressurization does not effect the ability of the pilot to do any of these. Planerench (Certified Aircraft Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic with Inspection Authoriztion) out
Top Top