in regards to the poster above re: ammo prices - that is just silly. 45 ACP (federal or aguila fmj 230 gr) is 230-250 shipped.
9mm is what 220-240? plus 9mm mag
options are limitted for NYers to expensive preban colts or uzi preban mags
which are also gettign pricey.
now on to the USC:
I've had two stock USC's and three converted to GG mag USC's. None had a single malfunction, I found them easy to clean and fun to shoot.
IMO carbines hit one extreme or the other. I find the CX4 'push' recoil is excessive due
to a heavy bolt, while the ruger PC9's 'snap' recoil is more than it should be due to a
strong spring, AR 9mm's give you that 'sproing!', but USC's get it JUST right in terms of
how the carbine feels while shooting. HK94's are sweet as hell, but I'll be damned if I'm
gonna clean one - now THAT is a bitch to clean.
Having said that , this time around I opted for a CAVARMs based 45 AR cause the USC
conversion to GG mags (we're in NY) is getting rare and expensive with the UMP mag
conversions gaining favor....
THERE IS a peice that can do it 'on the cheap', e.g. you don't ahve to do the whole
conversion to use GG mags. an early conversion piece (I had one in '05) replaced just
the lwoer reciever but let you use every other part, (e.g. thumbhole stock) as normal save the internal magwell which
of course you'd have to widen. It's ok - a monkey can do it.
If you track that piece down, it shouldn't be more than 50-75$, and all you'd have to do
is move your trigger parts into it and then open up the internal magwell on the upper.
With the 'full' conversion, you'd need a different lower that would neccesitate using (e.g.
its one piece) a true pistol grip, and you'd have to fix the folding stock as I don't even
think it's made in a non-folding version (fixing it is easy too - pop a 45 case inside the
button)....
sights are TO DIE FOR. they line up instantly, circle in circle with a faint square rear sight
outline. I'm not sure why i EVER put an optic on there. That's how much I like the
sights. But, FYI, tapco risers lifte dthe scope enough to alloow me to use the sights
under an optic, if you go that route. I wouldn't. It's agreat cheekweld with a low scope
mounted.
The only gripes I had were a) the folding stock means slinging it was wierd, but a fixed
stock fixes that. b) the offhand is kinda ackward without a VFG. there's little room for
a full grip, but it can be done. c)full grease gun mags are HEEEEEEAVY.
To tell you the truth, if I had the disposable income, I'd get a USC and buy up mags
and leave it stock. 10 rounds isn't enough for a rambo on teh town shootout, but it IS
ten rounds of 45. That's not too shabby. Plus you get a BHO and that's the only way
to do that in NY. Only problem is that stock USC mags are expensive and theirs no
cheap source.
Anyhow, I obviously like it, and here are some pics of the ones I've had (to make up
for my blathering) ....
(notice a pattern on the VFG's - IMO the SOG one is PERFECT for the USC/UMP - the non SOG grip pics are 1) a sell pic I had with seller's grip on it and 2) when I jsut received my first one and didn't know about the SOG grips. Fake cans were all off the EE and fit perfect.)
and as referenced, I have had the HK, colt 9mm, storm and PC9:
bu thte one I miss the most was my cavarms 45...
....so I'm building another now.
ETA: and in case you want to knwo why I'm so hot on carbines... I started shooting at Mitchell Field - no sense bringing a rifle round there.
The addiction stuck thoguh even after moving to VA, and now that I'm back it's stronger than ever.....