Savitskaya came forward by the convinced opponent of the mass, general armament of all citizens.It reasonably assumes that by the affair of the protection of life, health, rights of citizens must be occupied the state, pravookhranitel'nye organs/controls.In the manner that this was with the Soviet regime, when citizens felt themselves out of danger and when on the hands of citizens there was no weapon whatever.True, I will note from itself, then it did exist?state.Now people, which are located with the authority, worry only about themselves, about their safety, about their pocket.
Yes even the idea of general armament, according to The the savitskoy, they press, lobbiruyut first of all those, who produce and deal in weapon, those, who await good profits from this dangerous undertaking.
Its enemies fought for the free carrying of combat weapon.They gave examples from their own test, they referred for foreign statistics, promising safety to all citizens.But they clearly deceived by cunning, speaking about the universal armament.Yes even is not calculated this entire undertaking for the simple people, which most of all suffer from the criminality, they perish first.Indeed pistol will cost dollars two hundred.In our pensioners, teachers and doctors, in millions of unemployed, to see, fully excess money in order to lay out two hundred dollars for?pushku?,which they cannot use in the case of need.Where by them against fattened and pumped?bratkov?,by which man to kill, that fly to slam.
To?prelestyam?,by introduced into our life?demokraticheskim?by bespredelom, some hurry to add even krovushki.It is small to us unemployment, homeless, addiction and alcoholism, it is small prostitution and AIDS, not preceded with The chovetskoy authority, now another weapon must be to all sold as chewing.To see, not enough today people they kill, it is necessary this to widely place on the flow.
So what examples and arguments did bring amateurs to postrelyat' into the living people?
One of them described that once he expelled from the entrance of his chosen addicts, who at first did not react to its observations.But it was worthwhile for it to carry out gun from the apartment, as addicts here tyuey retirovalis'.By the way, participant in the dispute described about this reported that house in it are stored several units of weapon.
Other supporter of mass armament, who sat on the platform for the public and who was represented almost by series engineer, described about how once to it, that was returning from the guests, the robbers, armed by knife, attempted to attack on the street.The very same reached pistol and packed those attacked the snow, having preliminarily forced them to go down trousers to the elbows.
It is interesting, on whom are calculated similar stories;to the naive people?Me these stories even more greatly convinced of the rightness Of savitskoy.
Let us begin from the episode of the dispersal/acceleration of addicts.
It is remembered, still years fifteen back overwhelming majority of us considered narcotics some savagery.In the time of the destruction of the country the addicts became the ordinariness, with which it is possible to encounter/collide in any entrance, and now, you look, and by no means toy pistols will become standard.
However, what?ubeditel'nosti?the given example, then i have the question:and if the stupified by a good dose potions addicts did not obey frail to the form muzhichku with the gun or with the pistol?It would begin to shoot?And it would kill?
But attorney more lately inquired in it:for which, citizen, man they did kill?For the fact that it?addict?But our present super-liberal Russian laws do not forbid to people to hunt, to mutilate, to kill themselves.But there were no other actions from the side of addicts.And villages (if it was not purchased) our hero for long years for the murder.
4 not randomly it mentioned about the possibility to be purchased.In the studio?and this did today become standard?openly sounded words about the right through rotted through system of pravookhranitel'nykh organs/controls, about their korrumpirovannosti.Therefore no one believes in defense of citizens from the side of state.Therefore are audible calls to the free carrying and the application of the weapon whereas such wild for the previous times (not for the beauty of its suit I will buy and bear).How correctly did note specialist -speqnazoveq, convinced enemy of the general armament of citizens?by any weapon, and by those more combat cannot be frightened.If pistol reached, then shoot.True, its opponents, who so/such zealously fight for the daily carrying of?pushek?,it occurs, very badly they examine a question, counting, for example, that the pistol of Makarov, that PM itself, by which are armed the army officers and militia, are not combat weapon!And such?spetsialisty?they undertake to judge subject of the debate.