Quoted:Quoted:
The coach of the Manchester United team is a a 'Sir'.
While I love soccer, having him knighted yet not have a long list of people that did heroic things knighted makes no sense to me.
Isn't/wasn't a knight someone that rode into combat and FOUGHT?
a knight was a warrior through and through
Ummmm... Not exactly. A "Knight" was someone who held feudal obligations to a "Tenent-in-chief" like a Count/Baron/Earl/Duke or occasionally directly from the King. As part of the feudal obligation they were expected to EITHER provide military service OR pay a fee. In fact this obligation is where we get the word "fee" from.
Most knighted families had a warrior somewhere along the line in their ancestry, but quite often they were nothing more than landed gentry who paid the king money to avoid having to fight.
And that is during the Middle Ages. In more recent centuries, knighthood is a more honorary title... But even during the middle ages, someone who was a "Knight" did not have to fight if he paid the "fee"...
ETA: Many times the Kings preferred them to pay the "fee", that way they could use the money to hire professional mercenaries rather than being stuck with some country bumpkin landed gentry deciding to play warrior for the first real time in his life...