Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 7/4/2002 9:53:30 AM EST
I was at the range today doing a little 4th of July shooting, and we got to talking about the 94 crime bill, etc., etc. One of the guys claimed that there is a provision in the bill that if you commit a federal violation and are wearing cammo clothing at the time you can then be further charged as a terrorist. So, for example, some guy in hunting cammo in a duck blind shoots 1 too many ducks could theoretically be charged as a terrorist. It sounds suspicious to me, but then again firearms laws have always seemed to stretch the bounds of reason and sanity. Anybody care to comment on this?
Link Posted: 7/4/2002 9:58:31 AM EST
Link Posted: 7/4/2002 10:02:56 AM EST
Originally Posted By ColonelKlink: He is pulling your leg.
View Quote
You never know when the government is involved.
Link Posted: 7/4/2002 10:05:16 AM EST
Originally Posted By LotBoy:
Originally Posted By ColonelKlink: He is pulling your leg.
View Quote
You never know when the government is involved.
View Quote
In eight years, [b]NO ONE[/b] noticed this provision and commented on it? Scott
Link Posted: 7/4/2002 10:07:08 AM EST
Link Posted: 7/4/2002 10:37:37 AM EST
Yes, but you do see the implications for Fortune 500 CEOs who wear Ghillie suits instead of Brooks Brothers suits? [;)]
Link Posted: 7/4/2002 11:06:50 AM EST
I know shooting ranges as well as firearm training courses prohibit people from wearing camo clothings. Whether it be the media or our government, they'll make you look like a terrorist no matter what.
Top Top