Quote from site:
I do know, as a legal professional, that the Second Amendment has nothing whatever to do with "individual" anything--those lying or uninformed on the matter notwithstanding. [I]t is the opinion of this Congress that they [i.e. Tories] be disarmed. And they meant it. The Founders/Framers were not only for gun- control, but also gun prohibition and gun-grabbing. They actually enacted colony/state laws prohibiting those "disaffected with the Revolution" from possessing weapons. Did they follow through? Yes. That's why there was no counter-revolution. I realize these specific facts, verifiable by research, blow all of the chest-thumping "patriot's" hot air abstract myths out of the water. But that's the tough thing about specific verifiable facts when they come up against blowhard bullshit...
Is that true or just BS? sounds real, but I don't belive it.
[):)]
NSF