Quoted:
Quoted: People keep asking them why they never speak out against the REAL attrocities in the world, as opposed to complaining about the treatment of the Gitmo detainees who are being fed Lucky Charms.
|
The Bush administration liked Amnesty International until they started talking about US handling of detainees. Rumsfeld and Cheney both quoted AI reports repeatedly as justification for ousting Saddam. It's silly to complain that they never speak out against the "real atrocities". AI has been documenting abuse of humans all over the world for years, and have been harshly critical of a wide range of governments.
|
...and they have been equally as harshly critical about our own.
Either you are a 20-year old Liberal troll to this board, or you have a warped perspective of history.
Amnesty International has a track record of inability to apply perspective on things - and that goes back quite a ways. What does the Bush administrations use of their reports have to do with anything? I still run into older AI supporters who rant and rave about the Nicaraguan Contras but sing about the Sandanistas as if they could do no wrong. Perhaps AI "documented" Sandanista abuses, but they never exactly went out of their way to publicise them.
Maybe it was because left-wingers would be more willing to believe them than the CIA? You can rest assured that the government does not need AI to tell them who is doing what to whom in the world.
What AI fails to understand is that you can't have an AI without a free society. Associating the very society that has allowed them to take root and thrive with that of Stalinist Russia is LUDICROUS. I think even the older AI folks would admit that.