Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 4/15/2006 11:09:24 PM EST
[Last Edit: 4/15/2006 11:55:57 PM EST by AROKIE]
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:12:18 PM EST
exellent shot!
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:14:00 PM EST
You f*Cking KILLED that dirt!!!

Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:16:02 PM EST
God help us...
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:25:15 PM EST
Not to be too technical but the AT-4 is not a rocket.
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:27:57 PM EST
You can hear one guy right away, "Man, you suck ass!"
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:34:00 PM EST
YEAH! SHOW THAT INSURGENT DIRT WHO'S BOSS!

Next time, check your sights before going all Rambo, there. You just might hit the target.
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:39:48 PM EST
Teach those prarie dogs!!!!
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:42:28 PM EST
[Last Edit: 4/15/2006 11:42:54 PM EST by Slug-O]
That had to be a Marine!!!!!

Slug-O-Matic-UCMC 0352
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:49:57 PM EST

Originally Posted By Southernman077:
Teach those prarie dogs!!!!



maybe i should have made the title "prarie dog hunt video"
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:52:55 PM EST
The AT-4 is pretty much useless anyway.


It's not bad for bunker busting, but completely in-effective against modern armor.


We need something new for combat support troops to carry to neutralize armored threats.

The Carl Gustav would be perfect, but, unfortunatley only the Rangers and a few Infantry units have it.



Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:52:59 PM EST
I sooo want one!
Link Posted: 4/15/2006 11:55:29 PM EST

Originally Posted By Citabria7GCBC:
I sooo want one!




It's only good for one shot. It's a shoot a scoot weapon. You can pick up an expended tube at most surplus stores.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 12:37:18 AM EST
[Last Edit: 4/16/2006 12:43:29 AM EST by Black-Tiger]

Originally Posted By Slug-O:
That had to be a Marine!!!!!

Slug-O-Matic-UCMC 0352



Actually, it was a US Army soldier; note that he is wearing ACUs; Desert MARPATs are different.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 1:55:24 AM EST
kill those damn camel spiders!!!
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 2:23:21 AM EST

Originally Posted By AROKIE:
kill those damn camel spiders!!!



DEATH TO THE SPIDERS!!!
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 2:28:58 AM EST
"You killed that dirt"

Awesome heh
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 4:54:42 AM EST
lol

Great stuff!

Thanks for posting.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 9:24:31 AM EST

Originally Posted By leatherpuke:
The AT-4 is pretty much useless anyway.


It's not bad for bunker busting, but completely in-effective against modern armor.


We need something new for combat support troops to carry to neutralize armored threats.

The Carl Gustav would be perfect, but, unfortunatley only the Rangers and a few Infantry units have it.






Dude, all we use the Carl Gustav for IS bunker busting. The Javelin is the smallest weapon we have for tanks and IFVs. The only weapon in existance small enough (maybe) for defensive use against tanks by non-infantry types is the Spike SR, its a couple kilos heavier than the AT-4 but at least its a real IIR guided top attack missile. And even the IDF hasn't come up with enough cash to start production.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 4:29:48 PM EST

Originally Posted By JRBL1A1:
lol

Great stuff!

Thanks for posting.




no prob, I knew it would be appreciated here!!
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 4:32:08 PM EST
I stil want a 9mm trainer AT4 and some 9mm tracers.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 4:42:47 PM EST

Originally Posted By leatherpuke:

Originally Posted By Citabria7GCBC:
I sooo want one!




It's only good for one shot. It's a shoot a scoot weapon. You can pick up an expended tube at most surplus stores.



I've got one my friend's brother took from an ammo dump or something when he was in the Marines. I saw one for sale, maybe on eBay for like $400 or something like that. If it wasn't so badass, I'd sell it but it's going in me war room whenI get a house.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 4:51:00 PM EST

Originally Posted By smurfsgonewild:

Originally Posted By leatherpuke:

Originally Posted By Citabria7GCBC:
I sooo want one!




It's only good for one shot. It's a shoot a scoot weapon. You can pick up an expended tube at most surplus stores.



I've got one my friend's brother took from an ammo dump or something when he was in the Marines. I saw one for sale, maybe on eBay for like $400 or something like that. If it wasn't so badass, I'd sell it but it's going in me war room whenI get a house.



You mean that you have an expended one . . . right?? Because they are a Catagory I piece of ordnance (that means stand alone no other equipment necessary to fire) and also serialized and therefore traceable. I would hate life if I got caught with a live one. . . .



Link Posted: 4/16/2006 4:55:21 PM EST

Originally Posted By leatherpuke:
The AT-4 is pretty much useless anyway.


It's not bad for bunker busting, but completely in-effective against modern armor.


We need something new for combat support troops to carry to neutralize armored threats.

The Carl Gustav would be perfect, but, unfortunatley only the Rangers and a few Infantry units have it.






Yeah who has modern armor? I don't think we will run into anyone with any unless we go to war with our allies.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 5:03:14 PM EST
That can't possible be the same thing as this? Is it?

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-689902620988043628&q=Javelin
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 5:05:12 PM EST
[Last Edit: 4/16/2006 5:05:35 PM EST by NutOfGuns]

Originally Posted By fike:
That can't possible be the same thing as this? Is it?

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-689902620988043628&q=Javelin




No, In this video the one at the top they are fring a AT4. The one that you are posting is a Javelin.

Javelin is a lot more powerful.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 5:06:00 PM EST
[Last Edit: 4/16/2006 5:08:23 PM EST by ChrisLe]

Originally Posted By leatherpuke:
The AT-4 is pretty much useless anyway.


It's not bad for bunker busting, but completely in-effective against modern armor.




It may be a dog against modern armor, but it did a hell of a job for us clearing insurgent infested houses in Fallujah (Its new primary role considering Haji has no tanks)
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 6:13:13 PM EST
AT-4 is pretty useful against APCs, IFVs and the like. Tanks from the side, rear or top.

I am amused by the "AT-4 is useless, Carl Gustaf is good" comment. Both are 84mm recoiless rifles made by Bofors, indeed, the one is a development of the other.

NTM
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 7:22:04 PM EST

Originally Posted By Manic_Moran:
AT-4 is pretty useful against APCs, IFVs and the like. Tanks from the side, rear or top.

I am amused by the "AT-4 is useless, Carl Gustaf is good" comment. Both are 84mm recoiless rifles made by Bofors, indeed, the one is a development of the other.

NTM



how much explosives are in an at4
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 7:46:41 PM EST

Originally Posted By AROKIE:
how much explosives are in an at4



440 grams.



The CS version is pretty handy, but I don't think the Americans bought any. They have no blackblast.

NTM
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 7:58:34 PM EST

Originally Posted By Manic_Moran:

Originally Posted By AROKIE:
how much explosives are in an at4



440 grams.

www.clubi.ie/exalted/images/army/Ireland/AT4.jpg

The CS version is pretty handy, but I don't think the Americans bought any. They have no blackblast.

NTM



How does that work, I thought the whole point of recoiless rifles is that they use some of the gases to reduce the recoil by venting out the back?
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 7:59:03 PM EST
I am a little disappointed in the boom in that video.
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 8:00:09 PM EST

Originally Posted By NutOfGuns:

Originally Posted By fike:
That can't possible be the same thing as this? Is it?

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-689902620988043628&q=Javelin




No, In this video the one at the top they are fring a AT4. The one that you are posting is a Javelin.

Javelin is a lot more powerful.



Holy crap. Isn't the javelin the one that costs a fortune?
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 8:13:20 PM EST

Originally Posted By zaphar:
How does that work, I thought the whole point of recoiless rifles is that they use some of the gases to reduce the recoil by venting out the back?



I would wager it shoots a solid projectile out the back. That way you only need to be worried about what's immediately behind, not what's within a 90 degree zone, or worse, in the same room as you.

NTM
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 8:18:33 PM EST

Originally Posted By OG10807:

Originally Posted By NutOfGuns:

Originally Posted By fike:
That can't possible be the same thing as this? Is it?

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-689902620988043628&q=Javelin




No, In this video the one at the top they are fring a AT4. The one that you are posting is a Javelin.

Javelin is a lot more powerful.



Holy crap. Isn't the javelin the one that costs a fortune?



Compaired to what? How much money our goverment has? No.

Javeline

AT4
Link Posted: 4/16/2006 8:34:05 PM EST
Er...

pardon my cluelessness, but was that a prarie dog? I take it he was aiming for it.

(cluelessness off)

Top Top