So aren't those of you who pay extra for the photo database uploads a little frustrated that the photo server seems to be down about 50% of the day?
I mean, I am a Network Manager and I host and manage a number of web sites, but the down-time for AR-15 and its servers is quite high by any standard. The host server for AR15.com is (the IP that runs www.AR15.com):
host-66-202-29-79.roc.choiceone.net
and the one that runs photos.ar15.com is:
host-66-202-29-137.roc.choiceone.net
If that hosting company (ChoiceOne) can't keep the sites up, wouldn't it be good to change hosting companies? There are a LOT of very good competitive ones out there that will have a MUCH better QoS and uptime statistics, as well as better redundancy. I mean to have a site go down for as long as it did because of storms in NY is a little absurd for a web hosting company. They should have PLENTY of backup power. ChoiceOne advertises 99.9% uptime on their site, which equates to only 9 hours of downtime per year. AR15.com is down MUCH, MUCH more often than that. If I ran the site, I'd be demanding requiring refunds of hosting fees and better uptime.
Does anyone have any insight into this? Is AR15.com actually at a hosting or colocation facility, or is it run out of Ed's house on his DSL/Cable connection?
I love the site and want to help out with the downtime and other such problems.