Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
PSA
Member Login

Posted: 1/8/2003 12:25:28 PM EDT
Heh.  Do we have the next worthless item that fetches big bucks on eBay here?

HOORAY and good riddance!

Mods, I'd call this front-of-the-site gun news!  :)

[url]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030107/ap_on_en_ot/history_book_canceled_1[/url]
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 12:36:01 PM EDT

Wanna bet the antis will still quote his book as being fact?
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 1:04:38 PM EDT
[bannana][snoopy][bannana]
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 1:18:49 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Rescueram:

Wanna bet the antis will still quote his book as being fact?
View Quote


Wasn't the 9th circuit court quoting this book when they decided it was a state's right, not an individual right?
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 2:21:55 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/8/2003 2:24:50 PM EDT by Bostonterrier97]
That would be the Dec, 5th, 2002 ruling on [url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/661116A4ECB1A7BE88256C8600544DCB/$file/0115098.pdf?openelement]SILVEIRA V LOCKYER[/url]

Click on this link to read the full Opinion of the 9th Jerket Court of Appeals.
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 2:50:01 PM EDT
Actually the Opinion by the 9th only refers to Bellisiles book in regards to the definition of a machine gun (what a machine gun is ). The court doesn't base its opinion on Belisiles work.

Reading the foot notes is pretty interesting.

I must say...that while the 9th circuit court of appeals does make a good case, I disagree with it and think that their arguement for a collective right is based upon a rather torturous deconstruction of the semantics of the second amendment.
Top Top