Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 1/8/2003 11:25:28 AM EST
Heh. Do we have the next worthless item that fetches big bucks on eBay here? HOORAY and good riddance! Mods, I'd call this front-of-the-site gun news! :) [url]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030107/ap_on_en_ot/history_book_canceled_1[/url]
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 11:36:01 AM EST
Wanna bet the antis will still quote his book as being fact?
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 12:04:38 PM EST
[bannana][snoopy][bannana]
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 12:18:49 PM EST
Originally Posted By Rescueram: Wanna bet the antis will still quote his book as being fact?
View Quote
Wasn't the 9th circuit court quoting this book when they decided it was a state's right, not an individual right?
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 1:21:55 PM EST
[Last Edit: 1/8/2003 1:24:50 PM EST by Bostonterrier97]
That would be the Dec, 5th, 2002 ruling on [url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/661116A4ECB1A7BE88256C8600544DCB/$file/0115098.pdf?openelement]SILVEIRA V LOCKYER[/url] Click on this link to read the full Opinion of the 9th Jerket Court of Appeals.
Link Posted: 1/8/2003 1:50:01 PM EST
Actually the Opinion by the 9th only refers to Bellisiles book in regards to the definition of a machine gun (what a machine gun is ). The court doesn't base its opinion on Belisiles work. Reading the foot notes is pretty interesting. I must say...that while the 9th circuit court of appeals does make a good case, I disagree with it and think that their arguement for a collective right is based upon a rather torturous deconstruction of the semantics of the second amendment.
Top Top