Originally Posted By billclo:
If you can, please check out the problem I'm having with my D&H mags, here:
Take note of the first couple pictures. I'm wondering how the feed lips/top of your mags compare to D&H mags, and that of the pre-ban mag in the last picture. If yours are closer to GI spec than the D&Hs, I may buy a bunch of yours. I am not really very happy with my D&H mags; 30 of 40 I tested are exhibiting fail to feeds, and leaving deep scratches on the brass, probably due to the side of the mag dragging on the right side of the cartridge it seems.
I recently purchased some D&H mags and some CProducts mags. After reading your posts, I decided to compare the two side-by-side. Note that I have not had a chance to test any of these magazines. I am just describing my observations. Also, this is not meant to bash D&H magazines.
In my opinion, the CProducts mags appeared to be better made. The spot welds were all a uniform distance from each other and the top and bottom ones were placed closer to the ends of the body for added strength. The feed lips appeared straight to the naked eye and were symmetrical with each other. The two pieces of the mag body appeared to fit together better at the top and bottom.
Please keep in mind that I have not fired any rounds from either of these magazines. I am just stating my observations.