User Panel
Posted: 1/25/2006 6:24:54 PM EDT
Kimber CDP Pro II
Bushmaster V-Match 16" Glock 17 Beretta Cx4 Storm (not my top choice or buy a Walther P22 and suppress that? Please explain... Poll coming |
|
Why in the world would you choose to suppress only one? If its a money issue then buy one for the 17 and you can use it on the storm also. A good 9mm can will work suprisingly well on a .22 gun also. But it will probably not cycle. So you can suppress 3 out of 5 with one can.
|
|
I went with the P22 my first time around. This is an inexpensive way to get started. Cheap ammo and very quiet.
The Glock is really nice with the AAC Evolution 9. This is a top rated suppressor. The Beretta Storm would be nice for longer distances than a pistol can accurately shoot. Suppressing the Storm I'm getting ready to suppress an AR-15 with a Yankee Hill Machine suppressor. I will still hear sonic crack since this ammo is not subsonic; however, it will still be quieter. |
|
I'm on a budget. I'm leaning toward either the P22 or the Kimber. When suppressing .45 ACP you don't need any special ammo since, IIRC, the round never goes super-sonic. I do like the P22 though, and it would be a great gun to start my son on as well. There's no such thing as sub-sonic .223/5.56mm? |
|
|
I voted for the P22, only because it is the best "entry" suppressor platform. The rest of your options are difficult to suppress eficiently.
|
|
I'm assuming you own the guns in the poll, except for the Walther. It's the best sized gun for your (young?) son, but I'd not recommend it at all. They're fun toys. But that's the problem, they're TOYS. Lower quality, not very accurate, prone to breakage & other problems. You, and your son, will probably shoot .22lr more than anything else. Start with that caliber suppressor. You have a Kimber, right? Consider a Marvel .22LR Conversion Upper. These are EXTREMELY accurate .22lr kits for 1911 frames. Easy to thread. And a ton of fun. Much better bang for the buck than the Walther. (my opinion of course and as always, YMMV) |
|
|
Do they make a .22 conversion for the Pro CDP II frame? If the cost exceeds the price of the Walther it might break the budget... |
|
|
Have you heard a suppressed .45 ACP pistol? You might not be that impressed.
You would think a .45 ACP, since it is already subsonic, would be easy to suppress. But it actually is not the case. You'll get a lot more "giggle" factor with the Evo-9 on a G17 or G19 using 147-grain ammo. It is very close to "Hollywood quiet". With the Evo-9 you could then purchase the fixed barrel adapter AAC sells separately and use it on the Storm (after getting the barrel threaded; and I'm not familiar with the process for the Storm). You'll need a threaded barrel for the Glock. I use a KKM, but Jarvis also sells them. Expect to pay a little over $200 for a good Jarvis or KKM barrel. However, I think a suppressed .22lr is about as much fun as you can have and it doesn't get any cheaper to shoot all day. One thing to keep in mind regarding the .22lr ammo, most subsonic rounds are exposed lead. It is better to use plated bullets so they don't deposit as much lead in the can. Lead WILL build up in the can. I use an AAC Pilot on a Marvel upper. I started out with a P22 and let's just say I'm not impressed. The P22 is going back to Walther for fixes. When it comes back it is getting sold. ANd yes, it is a newer model with the updates and I'm using the "A" revision mags. I've got a friend with a P22 that is great, two other friends have P22s and they (the guns, not the friends) are complete crap. I think it is hit or miss with these pistols. The Marvel is a more elegant, more accurate setup, IMHO. Just so people know where I'm coming from, I am a class III dealer and sell Gemtech, AAC and other suppressors. However, the AAC cans are the only ones I stock because I think they offer the highest quality of the cans I've personally tested. For the .22 cans I like the AAC Pilot the best and the Gemtech Outback II a close second. For the 9mm can I feel the Evo-9 has nothing close to it. It is an incredible can. I've tried different .45 ACP cans and decided they just weren't for me, YMMV. You really don't get great suppression (IMHO) with any .45 can unless you add a little water to the can. Running them wet is the best way to go. I only mention about me being a seller because I don't want to be accused of shilling for a company for any gain on my part. For that matter, you aren't even in my state (GA) and should be dealing with a dealer in MD. Whatever can you decide on, try to get a demo of one before you buy. Everyone hears a little differently. I wish you much luck with your little silencer project. After trying your first quality can you'll soon want to suppress everything in your safe. Regards, Mark |
|
Mark,
Thanks a bunch for your insight. No I have never fired a suppressed .45ACP and yes that was my misconception. I was looking at AAC's site last night. They certainly have something for everything. It's hard to gauge the "quality" of a product online of course. Just one of those thing I would have to take someone's word on... like most things related to guns. I'm not sure where I would have to go to demo anything. I have fired a suppressed P22 and it seemed like a decent gun but I have heard a lot of moxed reviews on their quality and reliability. I do kind of like the idea of a .22LR conversion for my Kimber. Not sure on the price for one though. I seem to have it in my head that they run in the +$500 range. I was on the Kimber site checking some stuff out and saw a 17 Mach 2 versoin. I don't know dick about this caliber (aside from that a lot of people compare it to the round used in the P90) but it seemed like that would be pretty neat to have. Looks like it would have a little more practicaly use than a regular .22LR. Can you suppress that round with a .22LR suppressor, or is there no suppressor currently available that can be used with this round? I don't even know if you can just get a 17 Mach 2 conversion for a 1911... |
|
I honestly don’t know much about the .17 caliber stuff, so I’m not much help there. I do know AAC has a rifle can specifically for the .17 though. I think it would be way too heavy for a pistol.
The Marvel kits we got were a special run with extended, threaded barrels. They are VERY high quality. First day using it we were jumping around empty shotgun shells at 35-yards with ease. The do not come with a thread protector though, if that bothers you. However, those can be bought from other sources cheap enough. I’d have to ask my partner, but I think we were selling the Marvel uppers for something like $380 or $385 with a spare 10-round mag. And this isn’t too much over dealer cost we paid, believe me. We bought them to be a better demo platform. I could try taking some pictures later tonight if that would help you. I’ll also try to find out about the .17 through a Pilot. I think with the high speed of the .17 that it wouldn’t be very impressive, but I may be wrong. Let me know how I can help. |
|
Is a Marvel kit a 1911 conversion kit? |
|
|
Yes, it is. Right out of the box it went on a Kimber Custom II frame with no problems. IT has adjustable sights that will easily see over an AAC Pilot or Gemtech Outback II. The kit comes with one 10-round magazine. The price I mentioned included a second magazine, which is optional.
Interesting thing about the Marvel kits, they recommend you do NOT use Federal ammo. The caution against it because the Federal ammo has caused problems with the Marvel uppers. One other thing that may or may not matter to you, Marvel ditched the "last round hold open" feature. They did this because the upper is aluminum and the slide stop could easily start ripping into the upper. Make sense? At first I wasn't too thrilled about that, but now I see this as no big deal. The upper is very light. One of my business partners (zzxx99 on this site) is going to make me a dedicated aluminum 1911 lower. Should make the entire package very light weight. |
|
Quoted:
Sounds cool. Just out of curiosity, do they or is there any word on anyone making a .22LR conversoin that has a shorter length, closer to the carry models? |
|
What, a 5" 1911 isn't a carry model?
Just kidding. I have no idea if they plan to make a shorter version. Another very cool platform are the uppers available for Buckmark and Mark II pistols from Tactical Solutions. chainshaw on this site has one for his Buckmark. We tried my Pilot on it and it was VERY nice. Oh, wait, now that I think about it there is a company that makes .22 conversions for Glocks. Muddy on this site recently ordered one for a G19. I'll ask him for more info on that. I wonder if they have a conversion for a G17 as well. |
|
|
|
|
I found the link muddy had originally sent me. Here it is www.advantagearms.com.
|
|
That's the link for the Glock kits. They do have one for a G17. Muddy, I believe, ordered a kit. I'll talk to him later about it.
|
|
Advantage Arms makes conversions for the Glock that work well.
I would think the Glock 17 would be the one to suppress of what you listed. |
|
gunnut284, are those kits available with a threaded, extended barrel? I e-mails muddy to ask but haven't found out yet.
Thanks. |
|
Cool, thanks. Any reasons why they don't make higher capacity mags for .22LR pistols? Seems like they are always 10. Would I be correct in assuming that you need to buy these through an FFL? |
|
|
I heard back from muddy regarding the Advantage Arms kits. Here is part of what he sent me:
"Mark at TROS will thread them for $145. I wouldn't mind sending in a couple and trying to get him to cut a better deal on it." So, that answers the questions about the AA kits and threaded barrels. I made the comment to muddy about having the kit threaded by Mark at TROS. Now, I've done business with Mark at TROS and he is VERY good. However, I still am not sure I like the idea of sending a conversion kit to him uless I first ran the kit for awhile on my Glock just to make sure things are cool. That way if the kit has a problem I'm not stuck in the middle of AA and TROS pointing fingers at eachother. Just a thought. Sorry to kind of throw the AA kits out there as an idea without having thought through it all first. I was kind of thinking they came with threaded barrels until I checked that link I put in my other post. But if you really like the idea of a caliber conversion for the G17 and then running that with a can, I think the AA/TROS setup would be very nice. |
|
Sorry, I was still typing my other post when you posted yours.
The frame is what is serial numbered on a Glock, right? So, the AA kits would not have to go through an FFL. If you are seriously interested in one, Marty (mudy) is a good friend of mine and is a dealer as well. He could probably get you a good deal on an AA kit. If interested, just IM him though ARFCOM. Not sure why everyone is still doing 10-round mags. Bugs me too. |
|
Get a 9mm supressor capable of handling a subgun. Not sure the Evo does.
I know my SWR GS9-K2 is OK for very limited full auto, it also does pretty well on my Beretta 92FS. Anyway, I voted G17. |
|
Whats yer SHTF gun??? If it's the AR I'd suppress that first. I didn't go that way and wish I had a 5.56 can for the SBR right now.
|
|
We've shot an Evo-9 on a full-auto MP5-PDW using the Evo's fixed/barrel adapter. The MP5's barrel is threaded and has the three-lugs. We removed the Evo and threw a Striker II on it. The Striker II was a little more quiet, but the Evo-9 was still impressive. This was with 147-grain ammo. Both cans were, of course, dry.
|
|
Whatever I can grab fast enough that's suitable for the situation. In other words, I don't have a dedicated "Break Glass in case of EOTWAWKI" gun hanging on the wall above my bed. My home intruder killer would probably be my Glock. And your mentioning that makes a good point since it would be nice not to wake up the kids while I'm dishing out a lead salad any asshat that picks my house ot break into. My only gripe with putting a can on my Glock is that it would interfere with the LaserMaz I put on it and I kind of bought that, in part, for the purposes of home defense. See my dilemna? |
|
|
How did he go about getting the barrel threaded? Thanks in advance. |
||
|
Burney posted this one in the m16 board. As mentioned, it's very lightweight & fun to shoot. Accuracy nod would still go to the Marvel.
Per him:
|
|
|
So... how much would that set-up cost? Not including the cost of the Glock and the BATFE Tax? |
||
|
Not sure on the cost. Sent him note, so he should be along later with the details on this particular unit.
|
|
I "THINK" Gemtech was charging $300 or so back when they made these in 2001. With all their suppressor business, they dropped it from their catalog of offerings. Really slick setup. It wouldn't be any problem to duplicate the package today with the AA kit though. I'm just a bling whore and had to have one that said Gemtech on the slide. The kit is no different from the one AA sells today. It works and functions perfectly.
The AA kit can be threaded and a thread adaptor installed by TROS or Gemtech for around $135 I'd say plus the cost of the AA kit. I do believe you would enjoy it. When you're serious about playing with suppressed rimfires and cost is no object, you can go with one of these... It is a fun gun to shoot! |
|
1.) Is there a thread for suppressed firing videos around here? I'd like to get a general idea of what a suppressed AR sounds like. I know I've seen one that compared a .308 to a .223 and I was pretty amazed at the difference.
2.) I started thinking while I was out, what about doing an integral suppressor for my AR15? 3.) I have an HBAR though... is that good or bad when doing this kind of thing? It's a Vmathc so I'd definitely achive the "shrouded" look I love so much if I went this route. I woudl assume an integrally suppressed AR would be quieter than an attached can on the end of the barrel, right? |
|
I would go suppressed .22 route (that's what I'm going to do). I would look at either the Ruger MkII or the CZ Kadet.
Rich |
|
A .22 is much easier to suppress than any of the other calibers named. Also, it's easier (cheaper) to suppress weapons that are straight blowback because the barrel tipping can put strain on the suppressor and its' mounting.
|
|
The SWR Trident looks really nice. Works on 9mm subguns, pistols and carbines (threaded and 3 lug adapters available). Trident 9 |
|
|
Just curious... how well does .380 suppress? Like a Sig 232? .380 is just a shorter cased 9mm, right?
|
|
Ok... here's another question: I keep forgetting this but if I understand it right, if I buy a 9mm suppressor I pay the one time tax stamp, but I can put it on any 9mm I have that will accept it, correct?
So if I get the 9mm suppressor I can put it on either my Glock OR my Cx4? Seems to make that a bit more of a selling point. Getting a .22LR conversion for the G17 seems a little pointless since 9mm is hardly so expensive that I need to be frugal with it. I hardly ever shoot my .45 as it is so making that a .22LR wouldn't save me all that mcuh either. My only other consideration is getting my AR suppressed, but I'd like to do tha integrally if it's possible and doesn't cost too much to do it. |
|
Correct. |
|
|
Just to add one more thing, some suppressors may require an adapter to swap between the Glock barrel and a fixed-barrel weapon like the Cx4. For example, the AAC Evolution-9 can be used on the Cx4 carbine by swapping the piston assembly for their optional fixed-barrel adapter. |
||
|
Yes, I saw that on their site. I'm hoping to avoid having to change any parts out and to be able to just do a clean swap. I'm wondering if the Gemtech Trinity will work that way. |
|
|
Nope you have to change attatchments they have the Thread mount, LID and 3 lug attatchments. The LID would be for the Glock and the thread mount for the Cx4. The Trident is the same way also.
|
|
Trinity If I got a threaded extended barrel for the Glock and threaded the barrel of the Cx4 then I should be able to swap it between them, correct? |
|
|
The glock would require the booster or the LID, the Cx4 would need the plain thread mount. You can email Gem-Tech and ask them, they would be the definitive answer on it though.
|
|
What do you mean by booster or LID? You can't just have a threaded barrel and that's it? Or is it something with the recoil that you need more?
|
|
From the Trinity page on Gem-Tech's webpage:
the reason I said LID or booster is becasue each company calls it something else, AAC calls it a booster, Gem-Tech calls it an LID, SWR calls it an LCD. If you had say a Beretta 92 then you could use the thread mount on it and the Cx4 |
|
|
Why is it different for the Glock than the Beretta 92? |
|
|
in the browning design (glock) the barrel tilts where as the beretta's barrel stays more or less stationary. the weight of the can can affect the barrel tilting each time it is fired interupting the cycling of the gun and causing failures such as ftf's. the booster in some way conteracts the weight of the can enabling the pistol to cycle.
|
|
So does the adapter for the Glock stay on the barrel if you remove the suppressor? If you were doing a quick swap between the pistol and carbine would you be able to just unscrew the suppressor and put it right on the carbine or is the adapter attached to the suppressor itself? |
|
|
In the case of my Evo-9, the adapter is installed in the back of the can. The can comes with the tool needed to disassemble the back of the can to remove the piston "adapter" from Browning style pistols. Replace that adapter for the AAC fixed-barrel adapter and then screw the can on your fixed-barrel host weapon. Make sense? The adapter is part of the can, not something that attaches separately to the weapon. |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.