Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 11/15/2002 2:11:53 PM EDT
The only difference that I know of is the heavier slide and wrap around grips. If you want the gun as a CCW, which is better?

Thanks
Link Posted: 11/15/2002 2:25:30 PM EDT
I believe the Brigadier has the 1911 style frame.
Link Posted: 11/15/2002 3:08:27 PM EDT

Originally Posted By schapman43:
I believe the Brigadier has the 1911 style frame.



?
If you're referring to the 1911 style safety, I think that's the Combat model.

I've got a plain old 96 with Mec-Gar adjustable sights and a Hogue grip on it.
The Brigadier would differ only in the beefed up slide.
A regular 96 will suffice for carry duty.
Link Posted: 11/15/2002 5:41:34 PM EDT
I think the sights are better on the brigadier. The front sight is not part of the slide as it is on the 92FS, therefore the installation of night sights would be easier.
Link Posted: 11/15/2002 8:04:28 PM EDT

Originally Posted By schapman43:
I believe the Brigadier has the 1911 style frame.



i think you may be thinking of the bullinum (SP) 92. its a strange bird
Link Posted: 11/15/2002 8:13:41 PM EDT

Originally Posted By jrj397:
The only difference that I know of is the heavier slide and wrap around grips. If you want the gun as a CCW, which is better?

Thanks



Good gun, bad choice for concealment. It's one of the biggest 9 mils out there.
Top Top