Who has shot both of them and can compare the two of them? Living here in Iowa and wanting something more along the lines of a carbine length .50 for portability I'm leaning towards the .50 S-T because:
PROS:
1) Less felt recoil than same rifle chambered in .50 BMG as I'd like an 18" barrel length.
2) Uses less powder for reloading.
3) Lower pressure and brass should (?) last longer than chambered in .50 BMG.
4) Already have 4,000+ .50 bullets that can be used towards .50 S-T.
5) Should work real well with .30 sabot rounds.
6) Can rechamber .50 BMG to fire .50 S-T.
7) Available in from .50 S-T from Serbu, Ferret and one other mfg I believe.
CONS:
1) Brass is more difficult to find and more expensive than .50 BMG. I've heard about $450/1,000.
2) Just doesn't have the same visual effect of a .50 BMG loaded round when they're next to each other.
3) I can't think of any others.
I know there is a couple guys with .50 S-T chambered rifles and I would like to hear what they have to say and give me your input as this will be a sizeable purchase for me and I want to do it right the first time. Lastly, a .50 barrel can be rechambered from .50 BMG to .50 S-T as well as vice versa...correct?
Thanks for any and all input!