Quoted: Can anyone find a Springfield that has failed in your lifetime?
|
Yes. In the mid-70s at the National Matches, a cast receiver from S, Inc. literally broke in half. While not entirely common, it has happened enough of times.
Has anybody seen the torcher test conducted by guns magazine about 7 years ago. The Chinese guns were not even safe enough to participate in the test. They had to pour water on the Springfield numerous times to keep the stock from burning up. Oh well, I guess I am not up to speed.
|
If you're talking about the infamous hit piece sponsored by Springfield, that is old news and has since been refuted.
In the Fall of 1993, the Asst. Director of the CMSD (Civilian Marksmanship Support Detachment) asked John Kepler to bring his Polytech/USGI hybrid to a meeting attended by Col. Paul Cullinane, the DCM, Col. R. Robertson, Asst. DCM, James Rose from Anniston, and Mark Kovac, Chief Armorer, CMSD.
The rifle was examined by everyone present. It was then taken to Building 610 where Mr. Kovac disassembled the rifle and checked it against USGI M14 armorers guages. The receiver geometry was as close to USGI as you can get.
6 weeks following this meeting, a metallurgical analysis on the receiver was performed. The assay concluded that the receiver was made from an AISI 5100 series chrome steel. Surface hardness was a very USGI 56-58 RC, with a minimum depth of 0.010"
Their confidence ran high enough for them to purchase 12 receivers (4 each from Norinco, Norinco/CAI and Polytech) for possible inclusion into the program.
There is nothing wrong with Chinese M14-type receivers, dimensionally or metallurgically.